Moderator: Community Team
Honibaz wrote:I think they are made to be broken. Would appreciate any voting and/or opinion.
Honibaz
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
d.gishman wrote:Depends on if the law is fair or not. if the law forbade me to speak about a certain issue against the government (aka restriction of freedom of speech), i would feel strongly against obeying that law blindly. however, if it's a law against theft or murder, yeah everyone should follow that law.
Blastshot wrote:No, laws and rules are not made to be broken. But That doesnt mean they wont be, or should be.
Honibaz wrote:Blastshot wrote:No, laws and rules are not made to be broken. But That doesnt mean they wont be, or should be.
But you can't break a rule or law if it's not there.
Honibaz
Honibaz wrote:Blastshot wrote:No, laws and rules are not made to be broken. But That doesnt mean they wont be, or should be.
But you can't break a rule or law if it's not there.
Honibaz
Jehan wrote:Honibaz wrote:Blastshot wrote:No, laws and rules are not made to be broken. But That doesnt mean they wont be, or should be.
But you can't break a rule or law if it's not there.
Honibaz
well couldn't you equally say that the rule or law cant be obeyed if it doesn't exist?
Jehan wrote:so uhhh, is that it?
AlgyTaylor wrote:Laws are there to be respected. But with every law you can be justified in breaking it.
For example, one could justify murder in self defence if there was absolutely no alternative other than to kill the assailant.
Other laws might be easier to justify breaking, eg the poll tax laws were rightly ignored by many as it was an injust tax. Likewise breaking the 1994 criminal justice act should, IMO, be not just justified but an absolute obligation of every free thinking member of society (provided it's not done without due respect being paid to anyone directly affected by it ... ie so it's not bothering anyone)
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
MR. Nate wrote:There does seem to be big gap between
"I disagree with this law, so I'm going to work to change it, and that includes civil disobedience"
and
"This law is stupid, so I'm ignoring it"
or
"I break laws because thats what they're there for."
Users browsing this forum: WILLIAMS5232