Reading through D2 and commenting while reading. I won't comment on my former role's votes. I think that's not in the spirit of the game. Commenting on reads, however, makes sense as I'd probably read it the same again.
SoN!c wrote:Ugh - Thats a blow. But I was expecting town Ragian as target on night 2.. [...]
One of Ragian's last lines stuck with me (even more now i know he was town and he got eaten): "This could indicate that his fellow wolves are inexperienced."
1) Yeah, it's weird that any protective power wouldn't think that, but maybe they thought I was a wolf.
2) I think Strike's reaction to being caught - which is sheer bad luck - indicates that he doesn't have faith in a) his fellow wolves voting for him, and b) his fellow wolves not defending him when he's caught red handed. Or perhaps just some/one of his fellow wolves. It would be in the interest of the wolves to close down D1 and count their losses. This, however, is conjecture. I've just never seen Strike not give the opposite team a run for their money.
Votanic wrote:Yesterday ended quickly. Was night rushed on by the wolves? (I thought Strike might try to block votes as the Marm, but he did not.)
I would have very much like to have had a town discussion about night defenses. Ragian's death might have been avoided... It is likely some of the wolves voted for AWF lynch in an attempt to look Townish and rush the lynch without more discussion.
This is my point, too. If I were scum, I'd always make sure to be on a wolf lynch to gain town cred. You would want to look at the later votes. It's a tiny bit different here, though, in that Strike was caught out. It made no sense to stick up for him.
I don't think Ewebasher's voting history is damning. Especially not since it would've enabled us to get all our ducks in a row before nightfall if we hadn't rushed the lynch. Not reading Ewebasher scummy at this point.
The Loose-Pixar kerfuffle is more interesting. Pixar is slightly scummy for pointing his finger at Loose without any evidence that Loose defended Strike. Moreover, I have a hard time when someone tries to direct a lynch without voting themselves. IGMEOY (I Got My Eye On You), Pixar. Loose's reaction, too, is interesting. Is it an OMGUS (Oh My God, U Suck) vote, or is it merely his role restraints forcing his hand?
Devante is a bit of a mystery to me. He seems to want to rely on power roles more than reads. This makes sense if you're inexperienced, of course, but we can't rely on power roles and luck. We need to solve the puzzle as we go along. This means taking notes of what people say and what they do to find the important discrepancies. I'm chalking this up to inexperience at this point. He does, however, take a stand on who to investigate.
@Vot, I think you're on the right track looking at Strike's posts before he was caught. Strike is experienced, though, so D1 I don't believe he would be too fanatic about his reads. Also, I forget, do the wolves know each other from the get-go in this game like scum would in a "normal" game? Anyway... You're the second to say that Loose defended Strike. Where did he do that? You and Pix have both brought it up. Lastly, it's nice being complemented for my obnoxiousness and snarkiness from the grandmaster
EW resetting Vot is not alignment indicative in my opinion. EW really had no choice. He'd be dragged through the streets if he didn't reset EW. Hah, EW even agress with me a couple of pages later:
Extreme Ways wrote:Honestly never read me town for replenishing vot. Consider that the one in the building is scum, do they really have a choice? They can try to argue that they prefer to save it, but they will almost always just go for it anyway.
I don't like DDS's vote on Son!c. It comes off as baseless to me.
@Son!c, it is NOT in town's favour to say that you are a villager. Leave the wolves guessing. If you take yourself off the table as a valuable nightkill, it narrows down the list for the wolves. This also means no breadcrumbing, people!
Maxleod wrote:My readings so far: Son!c and Loose sound scummy AF. Everything they say is scummy.
I'll wait for the result of Vot's investigation.
A few things on the top of my mind:
The wolves didn't target Vot or EW.
Instead the bailiff, Rags, was NK'd, and wasn't replaced.
Could it mean that none of the vagabonds are Scum?
Okay, there are a lot of things to unpack here: 1) Apparently, everything Loose and Son!c say is scummy. Still, Max hasn't found any evidence to include in his post. Not even an explanation. 2) Then he say he wants to wait till there's a confession done (though he uses a different word), effectively saying that he's not willing to put in the work to weed out wolves. 3) Why would ex-me be replaced? It's a decent thought about the vagabonds, though.
Usually, I'd bite into this (no pun intended), but because it's Max, I don't know. I've seen him go days without really saying anything before he casts a vote without any reason behind it and turn up town. It's just bad play.
I like Fusi's input, and that DDS has two votes on him does indicate that he could be town.
I don't think it makes any sense to guess if there might have been an attempt at killing off other town players N1. We won't know till later, so for now that type of speculation is just flooding the thread.
@Son!c, I see that you have stumbled across the Strike post that Vot quoted some pages before you. Did you skim that? Also, as mentioned earlier in the game, you can't take that information 1 to 1. Strike is too experienced to leave a trail in his wake even if he didn't plan on getting caught.
Maxleod wrote:OK, here's what I think:
-Swang kills Loose Cannon (we can't lynch him because of his immunity). If Swang refuses to do so we lynch him (the wolves targetting the Bailiff N1 probably means that all wolves already are in a position of power).
-We lynch Son!ic
How does that sound?
It sounds like something you need to think through. What are your reasons for wanting to do this?
LOL, and when Loose actually says something with content, Max's reply is:
Maxleod wrote:You're grasping at straws. You die, period.
This is a certified way of getting me to not go with your plan.
Maxleod wrote:Look, it's simple:
-The wolves killed the bailiff because they already all have a public power role.
-The Barkeep can't be lynched.
-We need to get rid of the Barkeep.
(and also Loose sounding scum AF geberallty speaking)
This is better. It's just very far from being bulletproof. Even with one wolf between the vagabonds, it's a decent move to make sure that no vagabonds could get into a house. Or maybe they just wanted to get rid of ex-me because I'm so damn pretty. I see DDS and Dega agreeing with me on that.
Alright, that's me caught up. Has swang posted today?
FP'ed by Son!c