NW.Traveler wrote:I just have one question about card set values, and this may have been asked before, I'm not entirely sure...anyway:
In a flat rate game, a red set is 4, green 6, blue 8, and mixed is 10.
My question is, why is a mixed set worth more? Technically if you look at the probability of getting a mixed set versus a colored set, you're more likely to obtain a mixed set:
Colored Set: [Any 3 Colors], [1 Color], [1 Color]
Mixed Set: [Any 3 Colors], [2 Colors], [1 Color]
Therefore, the probability of getting a colored set is (1) * (1/3) * (1/3) or (1/9), and the probability of getting a mixed set is (1) * (2/3) * (1/3) or (2/9).
So if you're twice as likely to obtain a mixed set, why are they worth more than a colored set?
assuming you always cash in when you get your first set (no holding out for a better set), you have a 14/27 probability of your first set being a mixed set and a 13/81 probability of red and equivalently blue or green being your first set. 13/81 + 13/81 + 13/81 + 14/27 =1.
You are only 1/13th more likely to get a mixed set ((14/27)/(13/27)) over any colored set BUT you are 1/3 more likely to get a mixed set over any SPECIFIC color AKA you are almost 3x as likely to get a mixed set, than a set of reds.((14/27)/(5/27))=2.8
I think it is intentional that mixed is more. I mean why even have different values for reds, blues, and greens if they are all as equally likely. I think it is done to keep the game moving quicker.
Edit: This accounts for possibility of not getting a set on your 3rd or fourth draw instead of only focusing on the 3rd draw.