Conquer Club

Who take vaccine?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:03 pm

saxitoxin wrote:+1 HitRed

Even if you believe to the 99-percentile that the vaccines are safe and effective (which no sane person should), there is no good reason - unless you are in a high-risk group - to get vaccinated until your employer requires you to do so.

If you are part of the small group that suffers an adverse reaction you have no legal recourse. The vaccine companies have 100% immunity from lawsuits. If you're left paralyzed (as some people have), you will have to live the rest of your life on the charity of family. If, however, you are left paralyzed after getting vaccinated due to an employer mandate, you can take legal action against your employer. But that doesn't work if you are voluntarily vaccinated. If you get it voluntarily, you have no claim. You'll be on your own, thrown to the street, left to fend for yourself as a critically disabled beggar.


Do you actually THINK before you post, saxi? Do you believe anyone is THROWN out on the streets with NO resources in the USA? This nation is THE most caring nation of ALL its citizens and is very generous, with its tax dollars and charity donations. We even offer HELP to ILLEGAL Aliens who cross our border with NO paperwork. We have signs in SPANISH in our hospitals saying that they can get FREE care without consequence. I have SEEN them.

The poor in our nation ARE OVERWEIGHT because they EAT TOO Much of the WRONG foods. We GIVE away housing, rent, medical care, FOOD (VIA SNAP or "Food Stamps"); ALL this before COVID. And post-COVID, MORE BILLIONS in social welfare (that Democrats try to label as "social infrastructure".) And now the CDC, ILLEGALLY (apparently) extends the rental eviction moratorium. AND...

I volunteer at a local food bank and help GIVE away free food and no one there is STARVING. We even have a system for "weekly" visitors (our humane name for the HOMELESS). We have signs near where beggars ask for handouts saying CALL SOCIAL Services to discourage begging. MANY who beg are NOT needy or homeless. Many of those "on the streets" are there due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or mental illness. I am at my Church when these needy people come begging for money, often for drugs and or alcohol or assistance with rent and electricity, etc. DO NOT tell me that the beggars have no assistance.

YOU again try to offer a FALSE narrative, saxi. MORE FAKE NEWS. Do you do anything to help beggars or the needy? or walk around them? ignore them, too, as you ignore reality?
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:50 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:+1 HitRed

Even if you believe to the 99-percentile that the vaccines are safe and effective (which no sane person should), there is no good reason - unless you are in a high-risk group - to get vaccinated until your employer requires you to do so.

If you are part of the small group that suffers an adverse reaction you have no legal recourse. The vaccine companies have 100% immunity from lawsuits. If you're left paralyzed (as some people have), you will have to live the rest of your life on the charity of family. If, however, you are left paralyzed after getting vaccinated due to an employer mandate, you can take legal action against your employer. But that doesn't work if you are voluntarily vaccinated. If you get it voluntarily, you have no claim. You'll be on your own, thrown to the street, left to fend for yourself as a critically disabled beggar.


Do you actually THINK before you post, saxi? Do you believe anyone is THROWN out on the streets with NO resources in the USA? This nation is THE most caring nation of ALL its citizens and is very generous, with its tax dollars and charity donations. We even offer HELP to ILLEGAL Aliens who cross our border with NO paperwork. We have signs in SPANISH in our hospitals saying that they can get FREE care without consequence. I have SEEN them.

The poor in our nation ARE OVERWEIGHT because they EAT TOO Much of the WRONG foods. We GIVE away housing, rent, medical care, FOOD (VIA SNAP or "Food Stamps"); ALL this before COVID. And post-COVID, MORE BILLIONS in social welfare (that Democrats try to label as "social infrastructure".) And now the CDC, ILLEGALLY (apparently) extends the rental eviction moratorium. AND...

I volunteer at a local food bank and help GIVE away free food and no one there is STARVING. We even have a system for "weekly" visitors (our humane name for the HOMELESS). We have signs near where beggars ask for handouts saying CALL SOCIAL Services to discourage begging. MANY who beg are NOT needy or homeless. Many of those "on the streets" are there due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or mental illness. I am at my Church when these needy people come begging for money, often for drugs and or alcohol or assistance with rent and electricity, etc. DO NOT tell me that the beggars have no assistance.

YOU again try to offer a FALSE narrative, saxi. MORE FAKE NEWS. Do you do anything to help beggars or the needy? or walk around them? ignore them, too, as you ignore reality?


So I shouldn't worry about having no means of compensation for an adverse side-effect from the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, I can always just spend the rest of my life in a homeless shelter, eating canned foods from the local charity shop?

Yeah, that's gonna be a hard pass from me. Thanks.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby riskllama on Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:12 pm

for a guy whose diet consists largely of Hot Pockets, it doesn't sound like too drastic a change - might even be a step up, nutrition-wise... ;) .
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8972
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:24 pm

riskllama wrote:for a guy whose diet consists largely of Hot Pockets, it doesn't sound like too drastic a change - might even be a step up, nutrition-wise... ;) .

=D>
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28094
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:00 am

riskllama wrote:for a guy whose diet consists largely of Hot Pockets, it doesn't sound like too drastic a change - might even be a step up, nutrition-wise... ;) .


Llama with another short, funny, and insightful comment. :D
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby xroads on Sun Aug 08, 2021 1:14 pm

I took pfizer, 2 shots 3 weeks apart. Slightly sore shoulder for rest of the day was the only thing I noticed.

My son is getting his PHD in pharmacology, with an emphasis in immunology. Smartest kid I have ever met, far smarter than me. He is on the front line of this type of stuff and says for 99.99% of the population it is perfectly safe and possibly life saving.
Major xroads
 
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 9:29 am
2325642

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 1:59 pm

Fact: Not a single child has been born to someone who has received the Frankenvax.

Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby 2dimes on Sun Aug 08, 2021 2:27 pm

User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13085
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby KoolBak on Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:24 pm

Silly. You forgot whisky. And beer. And guns. And motorcycles.

And where TF is my sandwich?!?
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Private KoolBak
 
Posts: 7351
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:41 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SO which is it? show or not show? or are you hedging your bets so that you can claim "victory" in either scenario?

BTW: BOTH scenarios are STOOPID, as I am sure you know. So are the REST of your silly, superficial, and non-scientific arguments.

NOW for some facts from those who research such matters and do not engaged in wild speculations caused by an overdose of Hot Pockets: :D

Breakthrough infections and boosters
The good news is that a complete dose of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines remains effective. “All the vaccines work pretty well," said Jeff Kwong, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. "And the vaccines were more protective against the severe outcomes compared to symptomatic infection,” Kwong has shown in a study, not yet peer reviewed, the effectiveness of Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, or death between December 2020 and May 2021.
Skip to…..

Vaccines have prevented millions of infections
Vaccination may have saved approximately 279,000 lives in the U.S. and, by the end of June 2021, prevented up to 1.25 million hospitalizations, according to The Commonwealth Fund’s computer models. Similarly in England the vaccines may have prevented about 30,300 deaths, 46,300 hospitalizations, and 8.15 million infections. The aggressive vaccination campaign in Israel is estimated to have caused a 77 percent drop in cases and a 68 percent decline in hospitalizations from the peak of the pandemic in January, 2021.
Although COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are free and effective, only 49.9 percent of the population—just over 165 million people—are fully vaccinated as of August 4, 2021. Vaccination rates vary widely nationwide, and many counties in southern states, including Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, have low vaccination rates that are now fueling raging outbreaks of the Delta variant.
While more than 347 million COVID-19 shots have been administered in the U.S. since distribution began on December 14, 2020, there are still about 93 million Americans age 12 and older who are eligible for a shot but have not yet received one. There are also 48 million children under the age of 12 who are unvaccinated because they are still not eligible. That makes it difficult to predict how long this current surge will last.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective
With more than half the population incompletely vaccinated, the Delta variant can continue to infect and evolve, leading to more vaccine breakthrough infections than expected and possibly yielding new infectious variants.
Evidence is emerging that breakthrough Delta cases may be as transmissible as Delta infection in unvaccinated individuals. “The vaccines are protective, but obviously a lot of vaccinated people are also getting exposed, some from the unvaccinated and [some] from each other. And so, it's testing the vaccine capabilities,” says Topol.
But most breakthrough cases, which occur in less than one percent of fully vaccinated people, cause mild or no symptoms. Of the more than 164 million people fully vaccinated nationwide there were only 7,525 patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections who were either hospitalized or died in the U.S. through August 2, 2021.
Breakthrough infections are more likely among health care workers who are in frequent contact with infected patients, older age vaccinated people, and those with weakened immunity, such as people with cancer and prior organ transplant. Breakthrough infections are also more likely to occur in situations of close contact, such as in large public gatherings, restaurants, cramped working spaces, and outdoor or indoor parties.

So, xroads, his smart son, and my scientific sources TRUMP saxi's (lack of) experts any day of the week. The vaccine is safe and effective. Those who do not understand science and/or have unwarranted reasons are many who avoid the vaccine. I will concede there are A FEW with health conditions that would cause them to avoid or at least carefully consider getting the vaccine, but that is a small # and not the 35-40% who are hesitant.

saxi continues to tell his lies and tries to influence the feeble-minded with blather, speculations, and Fake News.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:02 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SO which is it? show or not show? or are you hedging your bets so that you can claim "victory" in either scenario?

BTW: BOTH scenarios are STOOPID, as I am sure you know. So are the REST of your silly, superficial, and non-scientific arguments.

NOW for some facts from those who research such matters and do not engaged in wild speculations caused by an overdose of Hot Pockets: :D

Breakthrough infections and boosters
The good news is that a complete dose of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines remains effective. “All the vaccines work pretty well," said Jeff Kwong, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. "And the vaccines were more protective against the severe outcomes compared to symptomatic infection,” Kwong has shown in a study, not yet peer reviewed, the effectiveness of Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, or death between December 2020 and May 2021.
Skip to…..

Vaccines have prevented millions of infections
Vaccination may have saved approximately 279,000 lives in the U.S. and, by the end of June 2021, prevented up to 1.25 million hospitalizations, according to The Commonwealth Fund’s computer models. Similarly in England the vaccines may have prevented about 30,300 deaths, 46,300 hospitalizations, and 8.15 million infections. The aggressive vaccination campaign in Israel is estimated to have caused a 77 percent drop in cases and a 68 percent decline in hospitalizations from the peak of the pandemic in January, 2021.
Although COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are free and effective, only 49.9 percent of the population—just over 165 million people—are fully vaccinated as of August 4, 2021. Vaccination rates vary widely nationwide, and many counties in southern states, including Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, have low vaccination rates that are now fueling raging outbreaks of the Delta variant.
While more than 347 million COVID-19 shots have been administered in the U.S. since distribution began on December 14, 2020, there are still about 93 million Americans age 12 and older who are eligible for a shot but have not yet received one. There are also 48 million children under the age of 12 who are unvaccinated because they are still not eligible. That makes it difficult to predict how long this current surge will last.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective
With more than half the population incompletely vaccinated, the Delta variant can continue to infect and evolve, leading to more vaccine breakthrough infections than expected and possibly yielding new infectious variants.
Evidence is emerging that breakthrough Delta cases may be as transmissible as Delta infection in unvaccinated individuals. “The vaccines are protective, but obviously a lot of vaccinated people are also getting exposed, some from the unvaccinated and [some] from each other. And so, it's testing the vaccine capabilities,” says Topol.
But most breakthrough cases, which occur in less than one percent of fully vaccinated people, cause mild or no symptoms. Of the more than 164 million people fully vaccinated nationwide there were only 7,525 patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections who were either hospitalized or died in the U.S. through August 2, 2021.
Breakthrough infections are more likely among health care workers who are in frequent contact with infected patients, older age vaccinated people, and those with weakened immunity, such as people with cancer and prior organ transplant. Breakthrough infections are also more likely to occur in situations of close contact, such as in large public gatherings, restaurants, cramped working spaces, and outdoor or indoor parties.

So, xroads, his smart son, and my scientific sources TRUMP saxi's (lack of) experts any day of the week. The vaccine is safe and effective. Those who do not understand science and/or have unwarranted reasons are many who avoid the vaccine. I will concede there are A FEW with health conditions that would cause them to avoid or at least carefully consider getting the vaccine, but that is a small # and not the 35-40% who are hesitant.

saxi continues to tell his lies and tries to influence the feeble-minded with blather, speculations, and Fake News.


Question: how many absolute cases of severe, adverse reactions have been recorded in all history to an mRNA based vaccine at the 12 month mark post vaccination?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:11 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:+1 HitRed

Even if you believe to the 99-percentile that the vaccines are safe and effective (which no sane person should), there is no good reason - unless you are in a high-risk group - to get vaccinated until your employer requires you to do so.

If you are part of the small group that suffers an adverse reaction you have no legal recourse. The vaccine companies have 100% immunity from lawsuits. If you're left paralyzed (as some people have), you will have to live the rest of your life on the charity of family. If, however, you are left paralyzed after getting vaccinated due to an employer mandate, you can take legal action against your employer. But that doesn't work if you are voluntarily vaccinated. If you get it voluntarily, you have no claim. You'll be on your own, thrown to the street, left to fend for yourself as a critically disabled beggar.


Do you actually THINK before you post, saxi? Do you believe anyone is THROWN out on the streets with NO resources in the USA? This nation is THE most caring nation of ALL its citizens and is very generous, with its tax dollars and charity donations. We even offer HELP to ILLEGAL Aliens who cross our border with NO paperwork. We have signs in SPANISH in our hospitals saying that they can get FREE care without consequence. I have SEEN them.

The poor in our nation ARE OVERWEIGHT because they EAT TOO Much of the WRONG foods. We GIVE away housing, rent, medical care, FOOD (VIA SNAP or "Food Stamps"); ALL this before COVID. And post-COVID, MORE BILLIONS in social welfare (that Democrats try to label as "social infrastructure".) And now the CDC, ILLEGALLY (apparently) extends the rental eviction moratorium. AND...

I volunteer at a local food bank and help GIVE away free food and no one there is STARVING. We even have a system for "weekly" visitors (our humane name for the HOMELESS). We have signs near where beggars ask for handouts saying CALL SOCIAL Services to discourage begging. MANY who beg are NOT needy or homeless. Many of those "on the streets" are there due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or mental illness. I am at my Church when these needy people come begging for money, often for drugs and or alcohol or assistance with rent and electricity, etc. DO NOT tell me that the beggars have no assistance.

YOU again try to offer a FALSE narrative, saxi. MORE FAKE NEWS. Do you do anything to help beggars or the needy? or walk around them? ignore them, too, as you ignore reality?


So I shouldn't worry about having no means of compensation for an adverse side-effect from the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, I can always just spend the rest of my life in a homeless shelter, eating canned foods from the local charity shop?

Yeah, that's gonna be a hard pass from me. Thanks.


At the food bank where I assist, we give away fresh seasonal fruits and vegetables, as well as milk, eggs and bread. In fact, tonight is my turn to pick up fresh bread from a local establishment to give away tomorrow. We should soon be getting fresh ears of corn. BUT we have NO Hot Pockets for saxi, so he can stay away from all that HEALTHY food we offer. (These items are in addition to the usual staples of canned goods, dry pasta, chicken (and other meats), tuna, and peanut butter, too.)
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:17 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SO which is it? show or not show? or are you hedging your bets so that you can claim "victory" in either scenario?

BTW: BOTH scenarios are STOOPID, as I am sure you know. So are the REST of your silly, superficial, and non-scientific arguments.

NOW for some facts from those who research such matters and do not engaged in wild speculations caused by an overdose of Hot Pockets: :D

Breakthrough infections and boosters
The good news is that a complete dose of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines remains effective. “All the vaccines work pretty well," said Jeff Kwong, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. "And the vaccines were more protective against the severe outcomes compared to symptomatic infection,” Kwong has shown in a study, not yet peer reviewed, the effectiveness of Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, or death between December 2020 and May 2021.
Skip to…..

Vaccines have prevented millions of infections
Vaccination may have saved approximately 279,000 lives in the U.S. and, by the end of June 2021, prevented up to 1.25 million hospitalizations, according to The Commonwealth Fund’s computer models. Similarly in England the vaccines may have prevented about 30,300 deaths, 46,300 hospitalizations, and 8.15 million infections. The aggressive vaccination campaign in Israel is estimated to have caused a 77 percent drop in cases and a 68 percent decline in hospitalizations from the peak of the pandemic in January, 2021.
Although COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are free and effective, only 49.9 percent of the population—just over 165 million people—are fully vaccinated as of August 4, 2021. Vaccination rates vary widely nationwide, and many counties in southern states, including Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, have low vaccination rates that are now fueling raging outbreaks of the Delta variant.
While more than 347 million COVID-19 shots have been administered in the U.S. since distribution began on December 14, 2020, there are still about 93 million Americans age 12 and older who are eligible for a shot but have not yet received one. There are also 48 million children under the age of 12 who are unvaccinated because they are still not eligible. That makes it difficult to predict how long this current surge will last.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective
With more than half the population incompletely vaccinated, the Delta variant can continue to infect and evolve, leading to more vaccine breakthrough infections than expected and possibly yielding new infectious variants.
Evidence is emerging that breakthrough Delta cases may be as transmissible as Delta infection in unvaccinated individuals. “The vaccines are protective, but obviously a lot of vaccinated people are also getting exposed, some from the unvaccinated and [some] from each other. And so, it's testing the vaccine capabilities,” says Topol.
But most breakthrough cases, which occur in less than one percent of fully vaccinated people, cause mild or no symptoms. Of the more than 164 million people fully vaccinated nationwide there were only 7,525 patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections who were either hospitalized or died in the U.S. through August 2, 2021.
Breakthrough infections are more likely among health care workers who are in frequent contact with infected patients, older age vaccinated people, and those with weakened immunity, such as people with cancer and prior organ transplant. Breakthrough infections are also more likely to occur in situations of close contact, such as in large public gatherings, restaurants, cramped working spaces, and outdoor or indoor parties.

So, xroads, his smart son, and my scientific sources TRUMP saxi's (lack of) experts any day of the week. The vaccine is safe and effective. Those who do not understand science and/or have unwarranted reasons are many who avoid the vaccine. I will concede there are A FEW with health conditions that would cause them to avoid or at least carefully consider getting the vaccine, but that is a small # and not the 35-40% who are hesitant.

saxi continues to tell his lies and tries to influence the feeble-minded with blather, speculations, and Fake News.


Question: how many absolute cases of severe, adverse reactions have been recorded in all history to an mRNA based vaccine at the 12 month mark post vaccination?


Why don't you research that since it is of great interest to you. I will speculate, as you are wont to do, saxi, and say VERY FEW such cases. THUS the vaccine is safe and effective. If one does the CBA on the vaccine, one or ALL of them, that is the consensus, based on ALL that I have read on the matter. And that absolute # of cases may depend, partly, on how you define "severe, adverse reactions."
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:20 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:+1 HitRed

Even if you believe to the 99-percentile that the vaccines are safe and effective (which no sane person should), there is no good reason - unless you are in a high-risk group - to get vaccinated until your employer requires you to do so.

If you are part of the small group that suffers an adverse reaction you have no legal recourse. The vaccine companies have 100% immunity from lawsuits. If you're left paralyzed (as some people have), you will have to live the rest of your life on the charity of family. If, however, you are left paralyzed after getting vaccinated due to an employer mandate, you can take legal action against your employer. But that doesn't work if you are voluntarily vaccinated. If you get it voluntarily, you have no claim. You'll be on your own, thrown to the street, left to fend for yourself as a critically disabled beggar.


Do you actually THINK before you post, saxi? Do you believe anyone is THROWN out on the streets with NO resources in the USA? This nation is THE most caring nation of ALL its citizens and is very generous, with its tax dollars and charity donations. We even offer HELP to ILLEGAL Aliens who cross our border with NO paperwork. We have signs in SPANISH in our hospitals saying that they can get FREE care without consequence. I have SEEN them.

The poor in our nation ARE OVERWEIGHT because they EAT TOO Much of the WRONG foods. We GIVE away housing, rent, medical care, FOOD (VIA SNAP or "Food Stamps"); ALL this before COVID. And post-COVID, MORE BILLIONS in social welfare (that Democrats try to label as "social infrastructure".) And now the CDC, ILLEGALLY (apparently) extends the rental eviction moratorium. AND...

I volunteer at a local food bank and help GIVE away free food and no one there is STARVING. We even have a system for "weekly" visitors (our humane name for the HOMELESS). We have signs near where beggars ask for handouts saying CALL SOCIAL Services to discourage begging. MANY who beg are NOT needy or homeless. Many of those "on the streets" are there due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or mental illness. I am at my Church when these needy people come begging for money, often for drugs and or alcohol or assistance with rent and electricity, etc. DO NOT tell me that the beggars have no assistance.

YOU again try to offer a FALSE narrative, saxi. MORE FAKE NEWS. Do you do anything to help beggars or the needy? or walk around them? ignore them, too, as you ignore reality?


So I shouldn't worry about having no means of compensation for an adverse side-effect from the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, I can always just spend the rest of my life in a homeless shelter, eating canned foods from the local charity shop?

Yeah, that's gonna be a hard pass from me. Thanks.


At the food bank where I assist, we give away fresh seasonal fruits and vegetables, as well as milk, eggs and bread. In fact, tonight is my turn to pick up fresh bread from a local establishment to give away tomorrow. We should soon be getting fresh ears of corn. BUT we have NO Hot Pockets for saxi, so he can stay away from all that HEALTHY food we offer. (These items are in addition to the usual staples of canned goods, dry pasta, chicken (and other meats), tuna, and peanut butter, too.)


So I should get the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, if I end up paralyzed and unable to work I can live the next 50 years in a Section 8 subsidized studio apartment and survive on handouts from the food bank, an Obamaphone and a freemium CC subscription?

If that's what passes for an enticing offer from the Frankenvaxers you'll never get above 60% vaccination. Again, a hard pass from sax on the vax. Thanks, though!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:26 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:+1 HitRed

Even if you believe to the 99-percentile that the vaccines are safe and effective (which no sane person should), there is no good reason - unless you are in a high-risk group - to get vaccinated until your employer requires you to do so.

If you are part of the small group that suffers an adverse reaction you have no legal recourse. The vaccine companies have 100% immunity from lawsuits. If you're left paralyzed (as some people have), you will have to live the rest of your life on the charity of family. If, however, you are left paralyzed after getting vaccinated due to an employer mandate, you can take legal action against your employer. But that doesn't work if you are voluntarily vaccinated. If you get it voluntarily, you have no claim. You'll be on your own, thrown to the street, left to fend for yourself as a critically disabled beggar.


Do you actually THINK before you post, saxi? Do you believe anyone is THROWN out on the streets with NO resources in the USA? This nation is THE most caring nation of ALL its citizens and is very generous, with its tax dollars and charity donations. We even offer HELP to ILLEGAL Aliens who cross our border with NO paperwork. We have signs in SPANISH in our hospitals saying that they can get FREE care without consequence. I have SEEN them.

The poor in our nation ARE OVERWEIGHT because they EAT TOO Much of the WRONG foods. We GIVE away housing, rent, medical care, FOOD (VIA SNAP or "Food Stamps"); ALL this before COVID. And post-COVID, MORE BILLIONS in social welfare (that Democrats try to label as "social infrastructure".) And now the CDC, ILLEGALLY (apparently) extends the rental eviction moratorium. AND...

I volunteer at a local food bank and help GIVE away free food and no one there is STARVING. We even have a system for "weekly" visitors (our humane name for the HOMELESS). We have signs near where beggars ask for handouts saying CALL SOCIAL Services to discourage begging. MANY who beg are NOT needy or homeless. Many of those "on the streets" are there due to alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or mental illness. I am at my Church when these needy people come begging for money, often for drugs and or alcohol or assistance with rent and electricity, etc. DO NOT tell me that the beggars have no assistance.

YOU again try to offer a FALSE narrative, saxi. MORE FAKE NEWS. Do you do anything to help beggars or the needy? or walk around them? ignore them, too, as you ignore reality?


So I shouldn't worry about having no means of compensation for an adverse side-effect from the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, I can always just spend the rest of my life in a homeless shelter, eating canned foods from the local charity shop?

Yeah, that's gonna be a hard pass from me. Thanks.


At the food bank where I assist, we give away fresh seasonal fruits and vegetables, as well as milk, eggs and bread. In fact, tonight is my turn to pick up fresh bread from a local establishment to give away tomorrow. We should soon be getting fresh ears of corn. BUT we have NO Hot Pockets for saxi, so he can stay away from all that HEALTHY food we offer. (These items are in addition to the usual staples of canned goods, dry pasta, chicken (and other meats), tuna, and peanut butter, too.)


So I should get the Frankenvax because, worst case scenario, if I end up paralyzed and unable to work I can live the next 50 years in a Section 8 subsidized studio apartment and survive on handouts from the food bank, an Obamaphone and a freemium CC subscription?

If that's what passes for an enticing offer from the Frankenvaxers you'll never get above 60% vaccination. Again, a hard pass from sax on the vax. Thanks, though!


saxi, I would further speculate that such a life is much better than what you have now in your Bunker (or parents' basement), with your head wrapped in foil.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:28 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SO which is it? show or not show? or are you hedging your bets so that you can claim "victory" in either scenario?

BTW: BOTH scenarios are STOOPID, as I am sure you know. So are the REST of your silly, superficial, and non-scientific arguments.

NOW for some facts from those who research such matters and do not engaged in wild speculations caused by an overdose of Hot Pockets: :D

Breakthrough infections and boosters
The good news is that a complete dose of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines remains effective. “All the vaccines work pretty well," said Jeff Kwong, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. "And the vaccines were more protective against the severe outcomes compared to symptomatic infection,” Kwong has shown in a study, not yet peer reviewed, the effectiveness of Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, or death between December 2020 and May 2021.
Skip to…..

Vaccines have prevented millions of infections
Vaccination may have saved approximately 279,000 lives in the U.S. and, by the end of June 2021, prevented up to 1.25 million hospitalizations, according to The Commonwealth Fund’s computer models. Similarly in England the vaccines may have prevented about 30,300 deaths, 46,300 hospitalizations, and 8.15 million infections. The aggressive vaccination campaign in Israel is estimated to have caused a 77 percent drop in cases and a 68 percent decline in hospitalizations from the peak of the pandemic in January, 2021.
Although COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are free and effective, only 49.9 percent of the population—just over 165 million people—are fully vaccinated as of August 4, 2021. Vaccination rates vary widely nationwide, and many counties in southern states, including Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, have low vaccination rates that are now fueling raging outbreaks of the Delta variant.
While more than 347 million COVID-19 shots have been administered in the U.S. since distribution began on December 14, 2020, there are still about 93 million Americans age 12 and older who are eligible for a shot but have not yet received one. There are also 48 million children under the age of 12 who are unvaccinated because they are still not eligible. That makes it difficult to predict how long this current surge will last.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective
With more than half the population incompletely vaccinated, the Delta variant can continue to infect and evolve, leading to more vaccine breakthrough infections than expected and possibly yielding new infectious variants.
Evidence is emerging that breakthrough Delta cases may be as transmissible as Delta infection in unvaccinated individuals. “The vaccines are protective, but obviously a lot of vaccinated people are also getting exposed, some from the unvaccinated and [some] from each other. And so, it's testing the vaccine capabilities,” says Topol.
But most breakthrough cases, which occur in less than one percent of fully vaccinated people, cause mild or no symptoms. Of the more than 164 million people fully vaccinated nationwide there were only 7,525 patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections who were either hospitalized or died in the U.S. through August 2, 2021.
Breakthrough infections are more likely among health care workers who are in frequent contact with infected patients, older age vaccinated people, and those with weakened immunity, such as people with cancer and prior organ transplant. Breakthrough infections are also more likely to occur in situations of close contact, such as in large public gatherings, restaurants, cramped working spaces, and outdoor or indoor parties.

So, xroads, his smart son, and my scientific sources TRUMP saxi's (lack of) experts any day of the week. The vaccine is safe and effective. Those who do not understand science and/or have unwarranted reasons are many who avoid the vaccine. I will concede there are A FEW with health conditions that would cause them to avoid or at least carefully consider getting the vaccine, but that is a small # and not the 35-40% who are hesitant.

saxi continues to tell his lies and tries to influence the feeble-minded with blather, speculations, and Fake News.


Question: how many absolute cases of severe, adverse reactions have been recorded in all history to an mRNA based vaccine at the 12 month mark post vaccination?


Why don't you research that since it is of great interest to you. I will speculate, as you are wont to do, saxi, and say VERY FEW such cases. [


That's right.

In fact, it's actually zero such cases.

Zero.

Why?

Because, in 6000 years of recorded human history there has never been a single case where a human has gone 12 months after receiving ANY mRNA based vaccine. The first such vaccines were administered on a mass basis last February. In February 2022 we will have medium term safety data for the first time ever. And I can then make an informed decision on vaccination based on whether or not you've gone blind at the 12 month post injection mark. If the guinea pig (you) is still with us I might end up getting the vaccine.

I can say "the data shows that there have been zero deaths from Subarus being hit by asteroids" and I would be accurate. Does that mean I'm perfectly safe if my Subaru takes a direct hit from space debris? No, it does not.
Last edited by saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:35 pm

what pathetic logic.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:38 pm

And you pathetic logic fails to answer all the other issues and concerns I raised about your superficial and weak arguments.

You offer red herrings to avoid the main points of the discussion. You are full of blather and obfuscations and your posts show that clearly.

Keep spreading your fake news, saxi. IT AINT working.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:39 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:what pathetic logic.


Lab rats are expected to say that, though.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13400
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 6:42 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SO which is it? show or not show? or are you hedging your bets so that you can claim "victory" in either scenario?

BTW: BOTH scenarios are STOOPID, as I am sure you know. So are the REST of your silly, superficial, and non-scientific arguments.

NOW for some facts from those who research such matters and do not engaged in wild speculations caused by an overdose of Hot Pockets: :D

Breakthrough infections and boosters
The good news is that a complete dose of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines remains effective. “All the vaccines work pretty well," said Jeff Kwong, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. "And the vaccines were more protective against the severe outcomes compared to symptomatic infection,” Kwong has shown in a study, not yet peer reviewed, the effectiveness of Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, or death between December 2020 and May 2021.
Skip to…..

Vaccines have prevented millions of infections
Vaccination may have saved approximately 279,000 lives in the U.S. and, by the end of June 2021, prevented up to 1.25 million hospitalizations, according to The Commonwealth Fund’s computer models. Similarly in England the vaccines may have prevented about 30,300 deaths, 46,300 hospitalizations, and 8.15 million infections. The aggressive vaccination campaign in Israel is estimated to have caused a 77 percent drop in cases and a 68 percent decline in hospitalizations from the peak of the pandemic in January, 2021.
Although COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. are free and effective, only 49.9 percent of the population—just over 165 million people—are fully vaccinated as of August 4, 2021. Vaccination rates vary widely nationwide, and many counties in southern states, including Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, have low vaccination rates that are now fueling raging outbreaks of the Delta variant.
While more than 347 million COVID-19 shots have been administered in the U.S. since distribution began on December 14, 2020, there are still about 93 million Americans age 12 and older who are eligible for a shot but have not yet received one. There are also 48 million children under the age of 12 who are unvaccinated because they are still not eligible. That makes it difficult to predict how long this current surge will last.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective
With more than half the population incompletely vaccinated, the Delta variant can continue to infect and evolve, leading to more vaccine breakthrough infections than expected and possibly yielding new infectious variants.
Evidence is emerging that breakthrough Delta cases may be as transmissible as Delta infection in unvaccinated individuals. “The vaccines are protective, but obviously a lot of vaccinated people are also getting exposed, some from the unvaccinated and [some] from each other. And so, it's testing the vaccine capabilities,” says Topol.
But most breakthrough cases, which occur in less than one percent of fully vaccinated people, cause mild or no symptoms. Of the more than 164 million people fully vaccinated nationwide there were only 7,525 patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections who were either hospitalized or died in the U.S. through August 2, 2021.
Breakthrough infections are more likely among health care workers who are in frequent contact with infected patients, older age vaccinated people, and those with weakened immunity, such as people with cancer and prior organ transplant. Breakthrough infections are also more likely to occur in situations of close contact, such as in large public gatherings, restaurants, cramped working spaces, and outdoor or indoor parties.

So, xroads, his smart son, and my scientific sources TRUMP saxi's (lack of) experts any day of the week. The vaccine is safe and effective. Those who do not understand science and/or have unwarranted reasons are many who avoid the vaccine. I will concede there are A FEW with health conditions that would cause them to avoid or at least carefully consider getting the vaccine, but that is a small # and not the 35-40% who are hesitant.

saxi continues to tell his lies and tries to influence the feeble-minded with blather, speculations, and Fake News.


Question: how many absolute cases of severe, adverse reactions have been recorded in all history to an mRNA based vaccine at the 12 month mark post vaccination?


Why don't you research that since it is of great interest to you. I will speculate, as you are wont to do, saxi, and say VERY FEW such cases. [


That's right.

In fact, it's actually zero such cases.

Zero.

Why?

Because, in 6000 years of recorded human history there has never been a single case where a human has gone 12 months after receiving ANY mRNA based vaccine. The first such vaccines were administered on a mass basis last February. In February 2022 we will have medium term safety data for the first time ever. And I can then make an informed decision on vaccination based on whether or not you've gone blind at the 12 month post injection mark. If the guinea pig (you) is still with us I might end up getting the vaccine.

I can say "the data shows that there have been zero deaths from Subarus being hit by asteroids" and I would be accurate. Does that mean I'm perfectly safe if my Subaru takes a direct hit from space debris? No, it does not.


FIRST NOTE that saxi fails to offer any real refutation here, except to offer up pitiful logic that makes NO sense.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 6:45 pm

saxitoxin wrote:Fact: Not a single child has been born to someone who has received the Frankenvax.

Once the headless babies start showing up, or don't show up, in December/January I'll be happy to reconsider my position.

Until then, my 0.09% absolute mortality risk, Vitamin D, and Hot Pockets are all the vaccine I need.


SECOND, note how BRAVE saxi is; IF this does not happen I MIGHT reconsider. PATHETIC. WOW. And if saxi does not eat Hot Pockets with Ham, I MIGHT consider that he actually has some intelligence. NOW THAT is bravery by me.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby jusplay4fun on Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:07 pm

THIRD part of my response:

Saxi tries to create fear by comparing the mRNA COVID vaccine to Thalidomide, a drug that caused some babies born in Europe, to be born with major deformities, including such things as a lack of properly developed limbs. He then goes on to talk about headless babies to try to create even more sensational “headlines” and cause more feat among the feeble-minded.

BUT
1) the two are NO WHERE linked, except as a drug
2) The FDA never approved Thalidomide to be used for pregnant women in the USA.
3) FDA emergency approval of the COVID vaccines, including mRNA ones, did undergo rigorous testing before use.
4) The mRNA vaccine cannot produce these babies that saxi is alleging. IF HE WERE to actually read about how those vaccines work, he MIGHT understand that. BUT he would rather try to spread fear and fake news.

5) Now here are the details, things that saxi hates to read because there are no pictures and it has more than 2 paragraphs.

What's happened to Thalidomide babies?
By Frederick Dove
BBC World Service
Published 3 November 2011


https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-15536544

Fifty years ago, the sedative Thalidomide was withdrawn after thousands of mothers gave birth to disabled babies. That ageing Thalidomide generation now faces rising care bills - but some hope a possible Nazi link to the drug could bring more compensation.
In November 1961, I was five months old. My family had no idea why their otherwise healthy baby boy had been born with short arms, twisted hands and no thumbs.
But by the end of that month, the truth was finally out in the open.
After a German newspaper reported that Thalidomide was the likely cause for the mysterious spate of disabled babies born in Germany since 1958, the drug's producer, Chemie Gruenenthal, caved in to growing pressure, and on 26 November withdrew all products containing Thalidomide from what had been very lucrative, over-the-counter sales.
A few days later, Thalidomide's British licensee, Distillers, followed suit in the UK. But by then, the damage was done.
Thalidomide has strong sedative properties and many women in the early weeks of pregnancy had taken it to ease their morning sickness, utterly unaware its effect on the unborn child can be teratogenic, or "monster-forming".

Limbs can fail to develop properly, in some cases also eyes, ears and internal organs. No-one knows how many miscarriages the drug caused, but it's estimated that, in Germany alone, 10,000 babies were born affected by Thalidomide. Many were too damaged to survive for long.


Vaccine testing falsely equated with thalidomide development decades ago
By BEATRICE DUPUYDecember 4, 2020


https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9802969269

CLAIM: “Rapid 8 month tested vaccine? Thalidomide was a RAPID APPROVED drug introduced in 1957, to address nausea and insomnia in pregnant women. It was marketed in 50 countries before being withdrawn in 1962 due to malformations in newborns. Be careful with what is coming.”
AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. There are different approval processes for the coronavirus vaccines and the drug thalidomide. Thalidomide was not approved for sale in the U.S. when first introduced in the 1950s. The drug did not undergo extensive trials as is being done with COVID-19 vaccines currently being developed.
THE FACTS: As drugmakers seek emergency use authorization for their COVID-19 vaccines, social media users are attempting to cast doubt about their safety because of how quickly they are being produced.
Pfizer and Moderna recently announced that clinical trials showed their vaccines were more than 90 percent effective. When the coronavirus was declared a global pandemic in March, medical professionals predicted that developing a vaccine to combat COVID-19 could take 18 months or more.
Posts online are comparing the short time period in which COVID-19 vaccines have been developed with issues around thalidomide, a drug that was once banned worldwide for causing birth defects in babies. The drug was in development for about four years from about 1953 to 1957 before it was introduced into the German market and sold in nearly 50 countries. It was advertised as a safe, over-the-counter sedative.
The drug was not approved in the U.S. at the time, but Americans were given the drug in two clinical trials. After it was discovered that the drug led pregnant women to give birth to babies with severe birth defects, U.S. agencies changed their policy on approving drugs.
Social media users began sharing the hashtag #Thalidomide on Twitter on Wednesday after news that Britain had approved a COVID-19 vaccine made byPfizer Inc. and Germany’s BioNTech.
“Lets hope there is going to be a full cycle testing!” one Facebook caption said in a post comparing the drug to the COVID-19 vaccine.


Vaccine testing falsely equated with thalidomide development decades ago
By BEATRICE DUPUYDecember 4, 2020
CLAIM: “Rapid 8 month tested vaccine? Thalidomide was a RAPID APPROVED drug introduced in 1957, to address nausea and insomnia in pregnant women. It was marketed in 50 countries before being withdrawn in 1962 due to malformations in newborns. Be careful with what is coming.”
AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. There are different approval processes for the coronavirus vaccines and the drug thalidomide. Thalidomide was not approved for sale in the U.S. when first introduced in the 1950s. The drug did not undergo extensive trials as is being done with COVID-19 vaccines currently being developed.
THE FACTS: As drugmakers seek emergency use authorization for their COVID-19 vaccines, social media users are attempting to cast doubt about their safety because of how quickly they are being produced.
Pfizer and Moderna recently announced that clinical trials showed their vaccines were more than 90 percent effective. When the coronavirus was declared a global pandemic in March, medical professionals predicted that developing a vaccine to combat COVID-19 could take 18 months or more.
Posts online are comparing the short time period in which COVID-19 vaccines have been developed with issues around thalidomide, a drug that was once banned worldwide for causing birth defects in babies. The drug was in development for about four years from about 1953 to 1957 before it was introduced into the German market and sold in nearly 50 countries. It was advertised as a safe, over-the-counter sedative.
The drug was not approved in the U.S. at the time, but Americans were given the drug in two clinical trials. After it was discovered that the drug led pregnant women to give birth to babies with severe birth defects, U.S. agencies changed their policy on approving drugs.
Social media users began sharing the hashtag #Thalidomide on Twitter on Wednesday after news that Britain had approved a COVID-19 vaccine made byPfizer Inc. and Germany’s BioNTech.
“Lets hope there is going to be a full cycle testing!” one Facebook caption said in a post comparing the drug to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Dr. S. Vincent Rajkumar, a professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, who has studied thalidomide and use of the drug to treat myeloma, said you cannot compare the coronavirus vaccine and thalidomide.
“One was trying to solve the problem of sleeplessness and was marketed with zero data, no efficacy or safety or randomized trials,” he said of thalidomide. “The other is trying to solve the problem of a life-threatening pandemic that has killed hundreds of thousands of people and there are two randomized trials showing the vaccines are highly effective.”
“The fact that people were efficient and fast does not mean that any of the safety steps were skipped,” Rajkumar said.
Unlike the early trials of thalidomide in the 1960s, the coronavirus vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna have undergone several trial phases including animal and human tests. The vaccines have been tested in more than 60,000 humans and both companies showed more than 90 percent effectiveness. Trial patients reported mild side effects like muscle aches and sore arms.

Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey, an FDA officer in the early 1960s, found that there was not enough safety data on thalidomide as U.S. clinical trials were still being conducted and helped prevent it from being approved for use in the U.S. During the 1950s,clinical trials could be conducted without FDA approval.
Around the world, thousands of pregnant women who had taken the drug delivered infants without limbs or flipper-like arms and legs. Some women in the U.S. got a hold of the drug from overseas or from clinical trials.
The drug was withdrawn in the United Kingdom around Dec. 2 1961.
Due to the work highlighted by Kelsey, President John F. Kennedy signed the Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, which changed drug oversight in the U.S., requiring manufacturers to prove drugs were both safe and effective. The law also required testing on humans.
Thalidomide was approved by the FDA in 1997 under tight restrictions to treat inflammation in leprosy patients. It has since been approved for other uses although it is not approved for use by pregnant women.
Later this month, the FDA will consider authorizing emergency use of two vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna. Current estimates project that no more than 20 million doses of each vaccine will be available by the end of 2020. And each product requires two doses. As a result, the shots will be rationed in the early stages.

JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Captain jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 8051
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Who take vaccine?

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Mon Aug 09, 2021 1:12 pm

Yeah, well my vaccine hasn't done anything to me weird yet.

Come on you debbie downers! Does it matter who takes it and who doesn't? Can't we just accept other peoples choices in life without gett-

FJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mkFJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mkyr;eljk6096u3i9560k,g sdffdlb kdflmgweop['FJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mk6ki03kop6,3lrw';gf,sgodfjkg90FJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mkk4-6i43-top,d';f'so30u9r83j9imFJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mkFJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mkwg fjsdk gvsdjkn3298ru8iBFJKnjkjkjkaks jkasjk gjds .kheriwtjn789yh32u5i2jnmfw mk

All is well, join me in vaccinated paradise. Nothing to fret. :D
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9261
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur