Trump Puts Americans First, Signs COVID Bill

[saxitoxin]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

[saxitoxin]

President Trump and the First Lady lit the National Christmas Tree yesterday!

[riskllama]

yes, that's much worse.

[armati]

They dont review evidence....exactly, why review when it shows corruption?

"This is the most important legal ruling from the Supreme Court in US history. If they allow the most fraud in an election in history to succeed, we may as not ever bother holding another election because election fraud is like beating your wife or throwing a tennis racket. No one does it just one time.

The Supreme Court may well soon pull the plug on the American Empire. It’s going to be visible from Mars for anyone there actually interested."

[jonesthecurl]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

In he court of public opinion he lost in 2016.

[mookiemcgee]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

Declining to hear the case was ruling on the case (lack of) merit.

[jimboston]

In 2016, Wikileaks released emails from the DNC and John Podesta. These emails exposed how the Democrat Party rigged the primary race for Hillary Clinton.

I just ran across another vclue that the U.S. elections are not honust.

The article I found this in explains why Assange is enemy # 1.

Free speech, has to die, its an enemy of...whoever the corruption is.

I wont say my guess, thats just another can of worms and I really dont think it matters.

I think "the bad guys" have already won.

Geez, they won when they killed the Kennedys if you ask me, maybe long before that, actually, definately long before that.
1815 comes to mind.

In any case, Hail Biden!!!

Another bunch of words, some misspelled, that make no sense... no links again.

This is evidence.

LOL

[Dukasaur]

Lou Dobbs has to backtrack on his Trumpist lies for fear of an expensive libel case.

Dobbs, an opinion host and conservative ally of President Trump who has consistently raged over the past month that the president was robbed of a second term by a rigged election, introduced a segment that calmly debunked several accusations of fraud that Rudolph W. Giuliani and other Trump supporters have lobbed against the election technology company Smartmatic.

The segment, it turns out, was in response to a 20-page legal demand letter that was sent this month by Smartmatic to Fox News Media. Similar letters went to Fox’s smaller competitors on the right, Newsmax and One America News. The letters demanded “a full and complete retraction of all false and defamatory statements and reports” aired by the network in its coverage of the Nov. 3 presidential election.

Specifically, the company charged: “Fox News has engaged in a concerted disinformation campaign against Smartmatic. Fox News told its millions of viewers and readers that Smartmatic was founded by [the late Venezuelan President] Hugo Chávez, that its software was designed to fix elections, and that Smartmatic conspired with others to defraud the American people and fix the 2020 U.S. election by changing, inflating, and deleting votes.”

Not only are these claims false, the company said, it played only a relatively minor role in this year’s presidential election, as a contractor for the election process in Los Angeles County, Calif.

In the legal letter, Smartmatic included segments from Dobbs’s prime-time show as examples of “false and defamatory statements/implications,” with some comments coming from Dobbs himself — Dobbs said on Nov. 18 that the company consists of “left-wing radicals” — and others from guests such as Giuliani and onetime Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell.

It is unclear whether the fact-checking segment fulfilled Smartmatic’s demand for a retraction. A spokesperson for the company declined to comment Saturday. In the legal demand letter, Smartmatic said that the comments made on Fox will cost the company “hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars” in value.

[jimboston]

Geez, they won when they killed the Kennedys if you ask me...

Who is “they”?

The best evidence now seems to be that it was Trafficante and the New Orleans mob.. maybe with the blessing of other families, maybe not.

No evidence that CIA or Russians were involved.

[jimboston]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

The fact that they didn’t hear the case is clear indication that they saw no merit in it.

[saxitoxin]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

The fact that they didn’t hear the case is clear indication that they saw no merit in it.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... e-standing

[saxitoxin]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

Declining to hear the case was ruling on the case (lack of) merit.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

I can't sue you for mouth raping Gym because I'm not directly impacted by the mouth raping. That doesn't mean the mouth raping didn't occur.

[mookiemcgee]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

Declining to hear the case was ruling on the case (lack of) merit.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

I can't sue you for mouth raping Gym because I'm not directly impacted by the mouth raping. That doesn't mean the mouth raping didn't occur.

If you don't have standing to file a suit, your case has no merit. Hence the court decision.

In (virtually) all the cases where the Trump legal team did have standing they lost, it was in those cases that the courts decided Jim wasn't mouth raped by anyone he just resented me for being a superior intellect and spread a bunch of lies he couldn't prove.

[saxitoxin]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

Declining to hear the case was ruling on the case (lack of) merit.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

I can't sue you for mouth raping Gym because I'm not directly impacted by the mouth raping. That doesn't mean the mouth raping didn't occur.

If you don't have standing to file a suit, your case has no merit. Hence the court decision.

Incorrect. A court first has to determine standing before it considers merit.

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/cl ... ween-claim

[saxitoxin]

BLM-Defunding protesters today launched a bombing campaign in downtown Nashville. So far no one has been killed.

BLM-Defunding is supported by the Democrats and this is an omen of the chaos, violence, and collapse of institutions that will rock America during the two years of the Biden presidency. If Congress doesn't act in the next 23 months, the Army will have to.

[riskllama]

lol, who is saying this has anything to do w/BLM, saxi?

*besides you, ofc...

[saxitoxin]

Get ready for chaos and violence in the streets. A preview of Biden's America ...

McCabe said police may have been the target of the explosions given they were called to the scene before the blast.

https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/ar ... ontext=amp

Biden's Silence is Democrat Violence

The only question that remains is if the US will last a full two years until Biden's removal without a civil war.

[HitRed]

Anyone missing a severely dated RV

[Jdsizzleslice]

Anyone missing a severely dated RV

No, I'm the one who knocks.

[jimboston]

They dont review evidence....exactly, why review when it shows corruption?

"This is the most important legal ruling from the Supreme Court in US history. If they allow the most fraud in an election in history to succeed, we may as not ever bother holding another election because election fraud is like beating your wife or throwing a tennis racket. No one does it just one time.

The Supreme Court may well soon pull the plug on the American Empire. It’s going to be visible from Mars for anyone there actually interested."

ugh

I am assuming you don’t think we landed a man on the moon either.

[jimboston]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

The fact that they didn’t hear the case is clear indication that they saw no merit in it.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... e-standing

There is no merit in the case if Texas has no standing to bring a case.

[saxitoxin]

i'm just spitballing here, but how about when they dismissed the lawsuit filed by texas legislators challenging the election results in 4 swing states, maybe?

The Supreme Court simply declined to hear the case, they didn't review the evidence or rule on its merits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf

In any case, the only court that matters is the court of public opinion, and Trump is three percentage points away from getting a victory in it!

The fact that they didn’t hear the case is clear indication that they saw no merit in it.

Incorrect. They ruled Texas didn't have standing to bring a suit. It was not a decision on the merits of the case. If they'd decided the merit of the case that would mean they heard the case.

https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... e-standing

There is no merit in the case if Texas has no standing to bring a case.

You seem to be in over your head on this one.

[saxitoxin]

Breaking: Police have discovered at leash one dead body at the site of the BLM/Pro-Biden bombing. The FBI have now classified it as a terrorist attack. Biden has yet to condemn it.

[mookiemcgee]

It's very sad Saxi has nothing to better to do on Christmas than to politicize a tragedy on a gaming forum. HitRed I think you should pray for him.