Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:CC user Gym (preferred pronouns: they/them) is reportedly IRATE at the veto - demands increased funding for transgender equality education in Pakistan - "the need is URGENT," They says.
Dukasaur wrote:Really? You had to add a second post just to pre-emptively insult members of our community?
Dukasaur wrote:Really? You had to add a second post just to pre-emptively insult members of our community?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Really? You had to add a second post just to pre-emptively insult members of our community?
UMMMM ... excuse me I'm pretty sure masochists and cuckolds enjoy being aggressed. And since Gym and MM are both Biden supporters there's a fair chance they qualify.
You're welcome, Gym and MM.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:I'm trying to stay relevant even though heir leader isn't anymore
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Really? You had to add a second post just to pre-emptively insult members of our community?
UMMMM ... excuse me I'm pretty sure masochists and cuckolds enjoy being aggressed. And since Gym and MM are both Biden supporters there's a fair chance they qualify.
You're welcome, Gym and MM.
mookiemcgee wrote:Enjoy 4 years of Biden Saxi!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Truth does not change in the face of lies. Saying that obvious fraud did not take place does not make it a reality. Neither does the power behind mainstream media change the facts into lies. Truth never changes. It does not fluctuate to please power or ambition. It stays the same. Truth does not accommodate the hidden agendas which expose themselves unashamedly in their own time.
HitRed wrote:Truth does not change in the face of lies. Saying that fraud took place with no evidence of meaningful fraud does not make it reality. Truth never changes. It does not fluctuate to please power or ambition. It stays the same. Truth does not accommodate the hidden agendas which expose themselves unashamedly in their own time.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:saxitoxin wrote:I'm trying to stay relevant even though heir leader isn't anymore
death throws* of a failed insurrection, by a dumpster fire of a leader. Enjoy 4 years of Biden Saxi!
Seems pretty clear. Return the bill along with written Objections. Not make a grandstanding YouTube video. Until he does that, Congress should act as if nothing had happened and not comment. Reacting to his YouTube announcement that he doesn't like the bill just abets his general disregard for decorum and proper procedure.if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it.
armati wrote:i just skimmed the thread, saw something about election fraud, i think there are people that dont believe it.
Maybe I read the thread wrong, but as far as fraud is concerned there is proof proof and more proof out there.
Ive seen it, Im not going to dig it up tho.
Just sayin.
Dukasaur wrote:I don't have an issue one way or the other with the bill, but I do think it's wrong for Congress to react to his video against the bill. The constitution lays out a pretty clear procedure for a veto:Seems pretty clear. Return the bill along with written Objections. Not make a grandstanding YouTube video. Until he does that, Congress should act as if nothing had happened and not comment. Reacting to his YouTube announcement that he doesn't like the bill just abets his general disregard for decorum and proper procedure.if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
jonesthecurl wrote:Sounds more plausible than "they rigged the election".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users