Germany/France/Mexico Denounce Biden Anti-Dissent Crackdown

[jimboston]

Why isn’t someone making sure Saxi is taking his meds?

[saxitoxin]

Biden being 82

Agreed.

[saxitoxin]

More Pro-Biden violence erupts in Portland as Biden Protesters Attack Police, Attempt to Overthrow City Government

Barricades surrounded Mississippi Avenue in North Portland late Tuesday night. It had grown throughout the day, as groups of people filled the area between North Skidmore and North Blandena.

As violence broke out Tuesday, neighbors told KATU they're worried about safety.

"I am authorizing the Portland Police to use all lawful means to end the illegal occupation on North Mississippi Avenue and to hold those violating our community's laws accountable. There will be no autonomous zone in Portland," he tweeted.

https://katu.com/news/local/barricades- ... d-standoff

The "autonomous zone" refers to an armed gang of BLM activists that took over a portion of Seattle for one month last summer. They established their own security force which engaged in a violent rampage, using firing squads to execute political opponents (the murders are closed cases / unsolved, since the area was a pro-Biden camp with no police). They eventually agreed to disband after first endorsing Joe Biden for president.

It's crazy how unhinged Biden supporters have become since the "blue wave" failed to materialize. They are so mad that Biden is opposed by the Senate and SCOTUS and won't be able to implement any of his policies and that his legitimacy is rejected by half the population. It's sad how enraged and insane they are.

[rdsrds2120]

Saxi please I wish they were that cool

[saxitoxin]

MAGA News Day!

Wonderful news today! Not only is Hunter Biden now officially under a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice for felony tax fraud (same as Al Capone), but 17 states (and growing) have now said they reject the legitimacy of draft dodger Joe Biden's claim to the presidency and are seeking injunctive relief to prevent him from entering the White House. The litigants (so far) govern 1/3 of the nation's population. Not since 1860 has there been such a dead reckoning rejection of the legitimacy of a presidential claimant!

Texas
Louisiana
Missouri
Montana
Mississippi
West Virginia
Utah
Florida
Oklahoma
North Dakota
Arkansas
Alabama
Nebraska
Tennessee
Kansas
Indiana
South Dakota
South Carolina

The Joint Litigant States will be represented at the Supreme Court by the Solicitor-General of Missouri, D. John Sauer (Duke '97, Notre Dame '99, Oxford '00, Harvard '03). Sauer was appointed Solicitor-General of Missouri by the next president (2024) of the United States, Senator Josh Hawley, well known for being a loyal Trump stalwart, having a dope hairline, and sporting an 8-inch package. Here's another pic of Senator Hawley, since I haven't posted enough:

"It's true. This is how big I am ... SOFT."

[saxitoxin]

UPDATE: Arizona has now joined the Joint Litigant States of America.

UPDATE 2: A March for Trump has been called for Saturday in D.C. It's expected 30,000 armed supporters of the president will surround the Supreme Court to encourage it to order Biden and his criminally indicted son not be allowed to use the White House to have sex with underage children.

[riskllama]

isn't he a little old for you, saxi?

[saxitoxin]

isn't he a little old for you, saxi?

he's a total DRLF (dad rdsrds2120 would like to f*ck)

close your legs, rds, sheesh

[mookiemcgee]

[rdsrds2120]

isn't he a little old for you, saxi?

he's a total DRLF (dad rdsrds2120 would like to f*ck)

close your legs, rds, sheesh

n o

[saxitoxin]

The elderly leaders of the Rats are not limited just to 82 year old rapist Joe Biden. This raises serious questions about whether the country is safe in the hands of the extremely geriatric leaders the Lab Rats, like Gym and mookie, have chosen to lead their Rat Pack.

Specific concerns are being raised about whether 90 year-old Senator Dianne Feinstein should serve her full six year term as second-in-command of the Rat's Nest in the Senate, or whether it's time to hand off her duties to a younger Rat like 80 year-old Patrick Leahy.

If Biden wins, the Senate will be nominally chaired by Kamala Harris, a hip 60 year old who makes Post-Menopause cool.

Dianne Feinstein’s Missteps Raise a Painful Age Question Among Senate Democrats

But many others familiar with Feinstein’s situation describe her as seriously struggling, and say it has been evident for several years. Speaking on background, and with respect for her accomplished career, they say her short-term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets she has been briefed on a topic, accusing her staff of failing to do so just after they have. They describe Feinstein as forgetting what she has said and getting upset when she can’t keep up. One aide to another senator described what he called a “Kabuki” meeting in which Feinstein’s staff tried to steer her through a proposed piece of legislation that she protested was “just words” which “make no sense.” Feinstein’s staff has said that sometimes she seems herself, and other times unreachable. “The staff is in such a bad position,” a former Senate aide who still has business in Congress said. “They have to defend her and make her seem normal.”

Feinstein has always been known as a difficult taskmaster. She is said to have told someone applying for a job in her office, “I don’t get ulcers—I give them.” A stickler for detail, she demanded to see every page going out of her office with her name on it. But with her diminishing capacity, this has become increasingly difficult. The former Senate staffer who still works with Congress declared, “It’s been a disaster.” As the ranking Democrat, Feinstein ordinarily would be expected to run the Party’s strategy on issues of major national importance, including judicial nominations. Instead, the committee has been hamstrung and disorganized. “Other members were constantly trying to go around her because, as chair, she didn’t want to do anything, and she also didn’t want them doing anything,” the former Senate staffer said. A current aide to a different Democratic senator observed sadly, “She’s an incredibly effective human being, but there’s definitely been deterioration in the last year. She’s in a very different mode now.”

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... ype=earned

Earlier, an open mic captured Senator Chuck Grassley, ranking Republican, having to patiently explain a vote to an audibly confused Feinstein.

[DoomYoshi]

[saxitoxin]

TODAY'S MAGA NEWS!!!

1. The Joint Congressional Committee on the Inauguration has voted down a resolution recognizing Joseph Robinette Biden III as president-elect. (Biden is an 82 year old serial rapist suffering from senile dementia. He graduated in the bottom 1/3 of his class at a low-rated law school.)

2. There are suggestions that the new criminal investigation into Hunter Biden - which involves the trafficking of diamonds from Chinese Communist Party officials as untraceable payments in exchange for applying unknown influence to unknown actors in the U.S. Government - could implicate his father, Old Joe, in impeachable high crimes and treason against the United States. Due to concerns Old Joe will try to fire the prosecutors investigating the matter after his "inauguration," there are now calls to appoint a Special Counsel to continue the inquiry. If appointed, there would then be two different independent special counsels investigating different aspects of Biden corruption from day one of his "presidency" - unprecedented in American history!

3. Arizona has joined the Joint Litigant States of America - the states that decline to recognize Biden as "president-elect" and are requesting a Supreme Court injunction. There are now 18 stars in the JSA flag!

[jimboston]

OK Saxi... explain the legal reasoning why the results from those four States should be dismissed, and ONLY those four States.

We’ll forget the fact that these other States suing have no Standing in Court, and we’ll forget the fact that the Supreme Court will just ignore this, and we’ll pretend there’s and actual chance that this will get argued in front of the Court. We can even pretend the Republican shills bring king the suit actually have a reasonable argument.

Just explain why these four and not all results in all 50 States? What the Texas AG alleges in his initial complaint, the ‘cause’ for the illegitimacy of these results... Texas did the SAME THING. Texas also changed polling times and mail-in rules, etc. So if those actions make the results invalid in the four contested States, then the results also would be invalid in Texas and almost EVERY OTHER STATE.

I won;t wait for an actual reply because you don’t have the brainpower to provide one, nor the balls.

[saxitoxin]

OK Saxi... explain the legal reasoning why the results from those four States should be dismissed, and ONLY those four States.

I am not a party to the lawsuit. However, in a 154-page brief, the Joint Litigant States of America contend:

Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (collectively, “Defendant States”), usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes. They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.

Plaintiff State challenges Defendant States’ administration of the 2020 election under the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This case presents a question of law: Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause (or, in the alternative, the Fourteenth Amendment) by taking—or allowing—non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?

As Justice Gorsuch observed recently, “Government is not free to disregard the [Constitution] in times of crisis. … Yet recently, during the COVID pandemic, certain States seem to have ignored these long-settled principles.” Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Cuomo, 592 U.S. ____ (2020) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). This case is no different. Each of Defendant States acted in a common pattern. State officials, sometimes through pending litigation (e.g., settling “friendly” suits) and sometimes unilaterally by executive fiat, announced new rules for the conduct of the 2020 election that were inconsistent with existing state statutes defining what constitutes a lawful vote.

The JSA go on to assert that no court except the Supreme Court can arbitrate a dispute between members of the Union of States.

This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over this action because it is a “controvers[y] between two or more States” under Article III, § 2, cl. 2 of the U.S. Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) (2018).

[jimboston]

OK Saxi... explain the legal reasoning why the results from those four States should be dismissed, and ONLY those four States.

I am not a party to the lawsuit. However, in a 154-page brief, the Joint Litigant States of America contend:

Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (collectively, “Defendant States”), usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes. They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.

Plaintiff State challenges Defendant States’ administration of the 2020 election under the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This case presents a question of law: Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause (or, in the alternative, the Fourteenth Amendment) by taking—or allowing—non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?

As Justice Gorsuch observed recently, “Government is not free to disregard the [Constitution] in times of crisis. … Yet recently, during the COVID pandemic, certain States seem to have ignored these long-settled principles.” Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Cuomo, 592 U.S. ____ (2020) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). This case is no different. Each of Defendant States acted in a common pattern. State officials, sometimes through pending litigation (e.g., settling “friendly” suits) and sometimes unilaterally by executive fiat, announced new rules for the conduct of the 2020 election that were inconsistent with existing state statutes defining what constitutes a lawful vote.

The JSA go on to assert that no court except the Supreme Court can arbitrate a dispute between members of the Union of States.

This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over this action because it is a “controvers[y] between two or more States” under Article III, § 2, cl. 2 of the U.S. Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) (2018).

Surprise, you ignored the question entirely!

Ok... again let’s assume that these are valid legal arguments. Neither of us are lawyers 9though what I’ve read says the AG’s have no standing0 but let’s put that aside. Why would that legal argument apply to just those four States and not EVERY STATE (including Texas) that CHANGED ELECTION LAWS/RULES? It wouldn’t...

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/states- ... d=72309089

For the general election, at least 30 states plus the District of Columbia have made at least some changes that will make it easier and more accessible for voters to cast their ballots from home. These changes include removing strict excuse requirements or allowing COVID-19 concerns to be a valid excuse to vote absentee, allowing ballot drop boxes, offering prepaid postage on election mail and proactively sending all active registered voters applications to request an absentee ballot -- with some even skipping that step and sending the actual ballots.

The states are: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-e ... d-n1026886

As the 2020 contest approaches, the laws that determine who makes it to the polls are in flux. Legislators in some states that may be crucial to an Electoral College victory have passed or proposed measures that would make it harder for residents to vote. Some states have done the opposite, removing barriers to voting. Still others have contended with challenges to existing laws — laws critics say were meant to restrict access to the polls or make victory elusive for certain candidates.

Here are nine states where the laws have been changed or challenged.
Florida
Ohio
Arizona
Tennessee
New York
California
Georgia
Mississippi
Wisconsin

Maybe we should just let Trump have DO OVER for 2020?
Run this bitch back in November 2021?

[saxitoxin]

Gas chambers working overtime to execute as many prisoners as possible before January 20! (Jail space needs to be freed up for the Biden crime family, apparently.)

As President Donald Trump's days in the White House wane, his administration is racing through a string of federal executions.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55236260

[Dukasaur]

Maybe we should just let Trump have DO OVER for 2020?

People who play golf with him are expected to. There's nothing he does honestly.

[2dimes]

They used to call it a mulligan, the kids probably changed the meaning of that word.

[jimboston]

What's happening now is an unprecedented effort at completely undermining the declared president's legitimacy and destroying the social contract.

Ok. So you admit the goal is to destroy the country.
Burn it all down as you walk out the door.

Explain to me again how that helps to make America Great?

Another comment Saxi strategically ignores.

Please help us figure out how this works Saxi.
We know Trump is all about making American Great Again.

He’s accomplishing this by dividing us even further?

[saxitoxin]

What's happening now is an unprecedented effort at completely undermining the declared president's legitimacy and destroying the social contract.

Ok. So you admit the goal is to destroy the country.
Burn it all down as you walk out the door.

Explain to me again how that helps to make America Great?

Another comment Saxi strategically ignores.

Please help us figure out how this works Saxi.
We know Trump is all about making American Great Again.

He’s accomplishing this by dividing us even further?

That's like saying "FDR created division between the USA and Japan by declaring war on them."

Like defeating Hirohito, defeating the Biden crime family is a noble cause. Whatever it takes.

[jimboston]

What's happening now is an unprecedented effort at completely undermining the declared president's legitimacy and destroying the social contract.

Ok. So you admit the goal is to destroy the country.
Burn it all down as you walk out the door.

Explain to me again how that helps to make America Great?

Another comment Saxi strategically ignores.

Please help us figure out how this works Saxi.
We know Trump is all about making American Great Again.

He’s accomplishing this by dividing us even further?

That's like saying "FDR created division between the USA and Japan by declaring war on them."

Like defeating Hirohito, defeating the Biden crime family is a noble cause. Whatever it takes.

That’s not extreme rhetoric. That’s not biased. That’s not enflaming.

oh wait... it’s all of those... good job Saxi...

[saxitoxin]

New on CNN this Autumn: "Everybody Hates Kamala!"

[2dimes]

Ok Saxi, hit the shower.

[saxitoxin]

BREAKING: Justices Alito and Thomas have dismissed the JSA request for injunction as lacking standing.

The Trump campaign appears now to be moving onto the next phase of the program and has announced a $32 MM advertising spend to blanket the airwaves with ads like these running up to January 20 to further undermine Biden and whip-up opposition. There will also be a mass Trump rally tomorrow in D.C. with a 2nd Amendment Open Carry demonstration on January 20 at the site of the actual inauguration.




Meanwhile, multiple Senators are now calling to consolidate all the Hunter Biden investigations under a single Special Counsel who can't be dismissed by a future president with an expanded mandate to investigate the entire Biden family and assemble a case for impeachment.