Germany/France/Mexico Denounce Biden Anti-Dissent Crackdown

[riskllama]

i think saxi should start the "penis hat movement" in a lame, somewhat derivative attempt to legitimize president reject Trump's allegations of mass election fraud.

[DBandit70]

If there was massive FRAUD, SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

lol they've been showing it since Nov.4

[riskllama]

LOL - who's "they", DB???

[jimboston]

If there was massive FRAUD, SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

lol they've been showing it since Nov.4

How come they keep talking about the evidence in online videos and tweets... but they don’t ever bring any evidence to court?

Are all the judges in the bag for Biden and the Deep State?

It’s interesting that Trump is calling this “The Most Important Speech I’ve Ever Made”.
It’s not a “speech” by any popularly used definition of that word.
You’d define a speech as “a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.”
There is no “audience” for this speech.

This video is a cut together presentation...you can see the cuts.
It’s not even him talking in one sitting... it’s heavily edited.

[riskllama]

painful to watch. really just tremendously sad & painful. some people are saying it's the most sad & painful thing they've ever seen...

[saxitoxin]

[jimboston]

You aren’t THAT delusional Saxi...

To still believe that Trump will be Inaugurated on January 20th?

[jusplay4fun]

And where is the evidence of voter fraud? Allegations mean nothing if they cannot be proven, especially in a court of Law.

And how many cases in a court has the Trump team WON?

And how many states have been turned from Biden to Trump after the court challenges?

SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

[Evil Semp]

Do we need another Muller-type special prosecutor investigation to get die-hards like Saxi to FINALLY CONCEDE that Trump LOST?

That's all I'm asking for, just a quick two-year investigation by 80 independent prosecutors accompanied by daily media updates and simultaneous committee hearings in the Senate helped by dozens of subpoenas of his staff, family and acquaintances. It just needs to last long enough to take us through to the midterms. It's really not an unreasonable request.

Anyway, in other news, 43% of registered voters (including 49% of independents) now view Biden's election as "illegitimate." Great news - the trendline is ticking up! Our goal is for at least 1 out of 2 Americans to see what they believe to be an elderly insider politician stealing the presidency for his own enrichment - and that of his millionaire, cocaine addict, possibly pedophile son - on January 20. Just 7 points to go!

https://today.yougov.com/topics/politic ... biden-poll

It’s funny how you mood the accuracy of polls and surveys when it suits you, and you use them as evidence you’re ‘right’ when that suits you.

Maybe we found Trumps CC account.

What's 3 x 0?
Saxi's I.Q. is at least 3 times Trump's.

[jusplay4fun]

Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

[HitRed]

Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

Every state has laws on the books that regulate elections. Setting days, hours, early voting, absentee voting, oversite and on and on. My best result is the Supreme Court says states must enforce their election laws that are on the books. Meaning governors and local judges don't have the power to change/modify/alter state election laws unless the law says so.

Example: Texas law says all voting stations close at 8:00 pm on election day. When a local Judge says his can stay open to 10:00 pm due to COVID-19 he isn't following the law he's changing or disregarding it.

HitRed

[mookiemcgee]

Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

Every state has laws on the books that regulate elections. Setting days, hours, early voting, absentee voting, oversite and on and on. My best result is the Supreme Court says states must enforce their election laws that are on the books. Meaning governors and local judges don't have the power to change/modify/alter state election laws unless the law says so.

Example: Texas law says all voting stations close at 8:00 pm on election day. When a local Judge says his can stay open to 10:00 pm due to COVID-19 he isn't following the law he's changing or disregarding it.

HitRed

First, this really isn't evidence... it's a legal argument. A very good and valid legal argument but proof/evidence would involve more than you just saying a judge said it can stay open til 10pm without provide a link to a news article or something to validate what you are saying.

Secondly, Texas is not a state that would help change the results of the election. Do you have an example of evidence something in this vein occurred in GA,WI,MI,PA,AZ? As far as I am aware the supreme court has not ruled on any cases in these states for the 2020 election as of yet. I have also not seen any evidence that local judges changed the laws in these states because of covid. I have seen that in PA the rules were changed and there was some debate (mainly just by saxi) on if it was done legally or not (this didn't involve a judge changing the laws ad hoc due to covid). My understanding is this case has been resolved in favor of validating the PA election results.

[saxitoxin]

Trump breaks post-election fundraising records!

President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee have raised $207.5 million since Election Day, according to a statement on Thursday.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN28E012

That's a headstart to undermine, delegitimize, resist and subvert the so-called "Biden presidency" from day one. Biden doesn't get one day of rest before the onslaught begins.

[jusplay4fun]

Show me the evidence.

Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

Every state has laws on the books that regulate elections. Setting days, hours, early voting, absentee voting, oversite and on and on. My best result is the Supreme Court says states must enforce their election laws that are on the books. Meaning governors and local judges don't have the power to change/modify/alter state election laws unless the law says so.

Example: Texas law says all voting stations close at 8:00 pm on election day. When a local Judge says his can stay open to 10:00 pm due to COVID-19 he isn't following the law he's changing or disregarding it.

HitRed

First, this really isn't evidence... it's a legal argument. A very good and valid legal argument but proof/evidence would involve more than you just saying a judge said it can stay open til 10pm without provide a link to a news article or something to validate what you are saying.

Secondly, Texas is not a state that would help change the results of the election. Do you have an example of evidence something in this vein occurred in GA,WI,MI,PA,AZ? As far as I am aware the supreme court has not ruled on any cases in these states for the 2020 election as of yet. I have also not seen any evidence that local judges changed the laws in these states because of covid. I have seen that in PA the rules were changed and there was some debate (mainly just by saxi) on if it was done legally or not (this didn't involve a judge changing the laws ad hoc due to covid). My understanding is this case has been resolved in favor of validating the PA election results.

[DoomYoshi]

Does the 14th amendment rule against Biden as president?

It should also be extended to anyone who voted for or supported Biden. These people think it's a joke to be fraudulent, but it actually causes damage.

[HitRed]

Show me the evidence.

When this news came out God said,

There is more.

[jimboston]

Show me the evidence.

When this news came out God said,

There is more.

One America News... definitely not biased.

You realize that this video shows nothing. You have a video of people working, and a biased voice-over that somehow “knows” exactly what they are doing. You can barely see the images, you don’t know what they’re doing or what is in those boxes or why they are doing what they’re doing. No one interviewing the people asking them what they are doing or what’s in the box. If this is demonstrable proof why aren’t they presenting this in court? You can’t watch a 90 second video and interpret what’s happening... you are TRUSTING One America News. You are making a choice to trust this video OVER the vast majority of actual news!

The only way to know what’s happening is to investigate...
- Watch the whole 12 hours of video from 6pm to 6am.
- Rewatch it, zoom in, compare different angles/different cameras.
- Examine the space and layout.
- Interview the participants.
- Interview them again.
- Determine the vote counting process.
- Etc.

I am SURE Republican lawyers have done all this.
At some point they realized there was no actual evidence.
So they haven’t brought it to court.
Anything they have brought to court has been rejected.
You’re smarter than our judges? All our judges are corrupt? Or “in the bag for Biden”?


Meanwhile... One America News takes a 90 second snippet and talks over it, and somehow it’s “proof”?

[HitRed]

Mr. Negative

[saxitoxin]

MAGA News!

The Senate just confirmed Dr. Christopher Waller to a 14 year term to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Going into the so-called "Biden presidency," 5 of the 7 governors will now be Trump appointees. And, only one will be up for appointment during Biden's "first term" meaning Trump's hand will continue to guide the nation's monetary policy for the next four years ... even if elderly and frail Biden acts as president.

Even better news ... every Democrat voted against confirming Waller. Which means we have precedent for every Republican to vote against any Biden appointment. The only difference is Republicans have a majority and can actually stop appointments.

[jimboston]

Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

[saxitoxin]

Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

Great. Why don't you educate use all by posting the other side of the story then. The logical explanation.

We'll be waiting here ...

[jimboston]

Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

Great. Why don't you educate use all by posting the other side of the story then. The logical explanation.

We'll be waiting here ...

The other side of the story for that video?

The election workers, which includes people from both sides of our political divide, were moving around the office processing ballots.

There.

Honestly... where in that video is there obvious nefarious activity?

How about we let Trump’s lawyers investigate, which they’ve done... and then present any evidence in court, which they haven’t.

[saxitoxin]

Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

Great. Why don't you educate use all by posting the other side of the story then. The logical explanation.

We'll be waiting here ...

The other side of the story for that video?

The election workers, which includes people from both sides of our political divide, were moving around the office processing ballots.

Source?