BLM, tool of the Marxist

[jimboston]

I was apparently late to the party. Could someone point me to ram's alleged racist posts?

Don't want to waste a lot of time on this, but here's one gem:
Subject: Extremist violence rising in Europe

I'm always a, "give the people what they want" type of guy, within reason

If the natives don't want immigration and want to keep their nationalist towns ethnically pure, I think there should be a place for that as long as there's understanding that they'll be checked (government military action) if they decide to engage in genocide outside of their, "safe space"

The human species is a world organism which consists of organs and cells(A German region consisting only of white nationalist movement would be the cell, Europe would be the organ)

The neighboring areas would consist of those who can mix together/play nice and as a buffer to Muslims and Jews who worship peacefully at their place of worship, free of bomb threats and other BS

There's many reasons this wouldn't work, mainly being that the all white areas would advance in every area much quicker, the standard of living would be better, economy would be far greater and this would entice the indolent and parasitic races, along with the communists. Jeez I just gave you a history lesson lol

Any idea who the "indolent and parasitic races" are? Definitely not the ones that the ram is a member of, I'm sure.

There's more to this than just posting that post.

Now, myself and dukasaur exchanged a few pm's in the days leading up to this post. He refused to act on a post that praised Islamic terrorists and said it was made in jest. So I explained to him that he was setting a precedent for 'jokey' posts. I still have the pm's. So I made this post as a joke, intentionally not mentioning any race.

He acted immediately. Much like when he banned me for raising awareness of asylum seekers attacking an old lady. He was so hurt because he claims that he was an asylum seeker. So, in a nutshell, he can love his people but I can't love my peoples. Who's the racist?

I’m calling Bullshit on this bolded comment.

You have already shown me that your perception of reality is warped.

I really don't mind what you think.

There wasn't even a race mentioned. Or was there in your mind?

Nomad is back.

[Jdsizzleslice]

Joe Rogan podcast today hosting Ben Shapiro. This was a good listen in the exchange of different ideas on what is going on in the country. Well worth the 2 hour listen, and you'll have some good laughs too.

[The ram]

I was apparently late to the party. Could someone point me to ram's alleged racist posts?

Any idea who the "indolent and parasitic races" are? Definitely not the ones that the ram is a member of, I'm sure.

There's more to this than just posting that post.

Now, myself and dukasaur exchanged a few pm's in the days leading up to this post. He refused to act on a post that praised Islamic terrorists and said it was made in jest. So I explained to him that he was setting a precedent for 'jokey' posts. I still have the pm's. So I made this post as a joke, intentionally not mentioning any race.

He acted immediately. Much like when he banned me for raising awareness of asylum seekers attacking an old lady. He was so hurt because he claims that he was an asylum seeker. So, in a nutshell, he can love his people but I can't love my peoples. Who's the racist?

I’m calling Bullshit on this bolded comment.

You have already shown me that your perception of reality is warped.

I really don't mind what you think.

There wasn't even a race mentioned. Or was there in your mind?

Nomad is back.

Yeah he constantly schooled you too.

You are the archetypal leftist. So far we've established that you had no idea of Poland gaining a massive part of Germany through the Versailles treaty. I gave you a neutral version of the run up to WWII (I'm a British person, both of my grandfathers fought during the entirety of the war, with my maternal grandfather being a part of D-day), you said I support the nazi's lol. And yet, you told me that all government lies about history, is that just the parts that you want to change?

You misunderstand the concept of social cohesion. Saying that during the 70s in Britain that the British people striking and protesting against government was proof of a lack of cohesion. Quite the opposite, the people were striking in solidarity. As a leftist, I'm sure you assume that social cohesion is doing exactly what the government wants. Did you even read the link I posted from official government archives from the late 40s?

I asked you to give me a single example of black and white living in harmony. Again, you just called me a racist, but no example.

You tried to derail the subject with talking about black wall street. I've since read about it, from a socialist site. Do you know the biggest factor behind black wall street emerging and being a success? Segregation! Black people were not allowed to shop in white shops, and white people were not allowed to buy any plots on black wall street. You bloody racist.

I say something without even mentioning any race. Your mind immediately jumps to the conclusion I know it would. You racist.

You talk down to Jdsizzleslice, even though he speaks sense and seems to me, to be a very sensible, mature guy. Unlike yourself.

Your failure to realise that a one world government would in essence become a dictatorship, unhindered by any external force, is naive and shows a complete lack of understanding.

I mentioned agenda 21, you immediately shout conspiracy theory. Google agenda 21 followed by the city you live in. It affects every facet of your life. Government has to go in the direction that agenda 21 dictates, even down to local level. Check it.

You are better suited to arguing with the forum idiot, Shimmy. At least he can make you look half way clever with your fine collection of words.

The End!

[Jdsizzleslice]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

[mookiemcgee]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

Was he banned? I though in the end he just bailed. Either way, not complaining he left was just curious of it was a choice or a ban.

[Jdsizzleslice]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

Was he banned? I though in the end he just bailed. Either way, not complaining he left was just curious of it was a choice or a ban.

I thought he was banned. To my surprise he is still a Registered User.

[jimboston]

Yeah he constantly schooled you too.

1) This is funny, how did he ‘school’ me, by getting frustrated and showing his true racist colors?

2) Please note the bolded word... this implies you think you are ‘schooling’ me. You’re most certainly not.

You are the archetypal leftist.

Have you read anything I’ve written here, aside of course from the comments I post. pointing out your failures?

I can see you haven’t. If you had you’d notice that I have positions on both “side” and argue with people here who are racists like yourself, as well as left leaning people on other subjects. I only seem ‘Leftist’ to you because you’re the most extreme nut job we have here now.

So far we've established that you had no idea of Poland gaining a massive part of Germany through the Versailles treaty.

um No.

You didn’t establish this, I ignored you because you used this “fact” to in a lame attempt to defend Hitler’s actions in invading Poland.

The land you claim Germany was ‘just taking back’ had been taken from Poland by Prussia/Germany and was full of ethnic Poles.

These countries in the middle of Europe have been taking land from eachother and fighting over territory forever... and you could probably go back before the Division of Poland by Prussia(Germany) and Russia; and find when the Poles had taken it from them. That’s not the point.

The point is that you claimed that in WW2 the Allies were somehow the initial aggressors.... and I pointed out how Hitler could’ve avoided war by not invading Poland (an aggressive act). The Allies declared war on Germany because they finally realized Hitler wouldn’t stop.

You however chose to defend his (Hitler’s) actions.

I gave you a neutral version of the run up to WWII (I'm a British person,

Not neutral.

both of my grandfathers fought during the entirety of the war, with my maternal grandfather being a part of D-day), you said I support the nazi's lol.

So then why do you defend Hitler’s actions.

And yet, you told me that all government lies about history, is that just the parts that you want to change?

Yes, many governments including the US may lie or at the very least emphasize parts of history that serve their needs while ignoring or de-emphasizing others. This does NOT mean that ‘standard’ textbook history is all lies.

You need to learn more about logical debate.

You misunderstand the concept of social cohesion. Saying that during the 70s in Britain that the British people striking and protesting against government was proof of a lack of cohesion. Quite the opposite, the people were striking in solidarity.

This is NOT how you were painting the idea of cohesion that I refuted.

What you said before...

Look at Britain for example. Never has there been so much division. Feminist against patriarch, young against old, black against white, muslim against Christian, gay against straight, transgender against normal sex, left against right, Muslim against gays, left against Jews etc etc etc. Do you class that as progress, say, compared to a cohesive Britain of 50 year ago?

I suppose you can force this to mean “there was cohesion among white working-class English men” in the 1970’s.

Gay, Jews, and ethnic minorities are not part of your thinking. They were never a part of that ‘cohesive’ Britain you claim existed. Perhaps back then they kept quiet because it was safer... but they were not a part of the “Britain” you think existed. Furthermore, when you say “Britain” you’re really talking about England. The Welsh and Scottish and Irish (especially the Irish) were never a part of the “Britain” you dream of.... yet your Crown would certainly all claim them as subjects... so they are part of “Britain”. It’s even worse if you go back 20 years before that? We’re all those Indian people part of your “cohesive Britain” too?

As a leftist, I'm sure you assume that social cohesion is doing exactly what the government wants. Did you even read the link I posted from official government archives from the late 40s?

I wouldn’t know how a leftist thinks.

I asked you to give me a single example of black and white living in harmony. Again, you just called me a racist, but no example.

Yeah... I pointed out Tulsa / Black Wall Street. It gives a great example of what has happened when Black people better themselves and demand equality. White people burn their homes and businesses to the ground. Prior to that massacre the Black people of Tulsa were very happy to live there in peace next to their white neighbors.

You tried to derail the subject with talking about black wall street. I've since read about it, from a socialist site. Do you know the biggest factor behind black wall street emerging and being a success? Segregation! Black people were not allowed to shop in white shops, and white people were not allowed to buy any plots on black wall street. You bloody racist.

LOL. So me helping to bring the Tulsa Massacre into the light is racist? LOL

I say something without even mentioning any race. Your mind immediately jumps to the conclusion I know it would. You racist.

Hi Nomad.

You can use whatever euphemisms you like... they don’t hide your racism, and they don’t give you cover to somehow turn the table on me.

You talk down to Jdsizzleslice, even though he speaks sense and seems to me, to be a very sensible, mature guy. Unlike yourself.

That’s an endorsement. Not one anyone cares about... but it’s n endorsement nonetheless.

Your failure to realise that a one world government would in essence become a dictatorship, unhindered by any external force, is naive and shows a complete lack of understanding.

Ugh... I’m not repeating myself on this subject. I’m not the most trusting guy when it comes to government... it I am a realist. Sorry.

I mentioned agenda 21, you immediately shout conspiracy theory. Google agenda 21 followed by the city you live in. It affects every facet of your life. Government has to go in the direction that agenda 21 dictates, even down to local level. Check it.

I’ve read Agenda 21. It’s meaningless. It has no teeth except for the teeth you conspiracy theorists give it to make it seem like a Boogey Man.

You are better suited to arguing with the forum idiot,

I’m pretty sure that’s what I doing at this moment.

The End!

You got me here with the Exclamation Point. I was doing pretty well arguing with you till you ended the whole thing officially like that.

[jimboston]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

The Ram is using the exact same lame tactics.

[Jdsizzleslice]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

The Ram is using the exact same lame tactics.

Ok, regardless on whether or not you're right, you've called multiple people Nomad in the past several threads.

You're obsessed.

[jimboston]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

The Ram is using the exact same lame tactics.

Ok, regardless on whether or not you're right, you've called multiple people Nomad in the past several threads.

You're obsessed.

I apologized for calling you Nomad.
(Though you did use his play book.)

I’m pretty sure the “multiple people” you are talking about only includes yourself and the Ram.

What do you two and Nomad have in common???

Lame argument styles/tactics... check.
Right wing political views... check.
Hatred for being demonstrably wrong... check.
Racist Personality... XXX. Denied, The Ram and Nomad are demonstrably racist. You’ve proven to be better than that.
Hence my apology for mistakenly putting you in that group.

[mookiemcgee]

I mentioned agenda 21, you immediately shout conspiracy theory. Google agenda 21 followed by the city you live in. It affects every facet of your life. Government has to go in the direction that agenda 21 dictates, even down to local level. Check it.

I’ve read Agenda 21. It’s meaningless. It has no teeth except for the teeth you conspiracy theorists give it to make it seem like a Boogey Man.

"Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan... "(the rest doesn't matter, because non-biding agreements between nations does not equal a conspiracy to take all citizens property rights away and replace countries own gov'ts with a One World Gov't)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21

[The ram]

Nomad is back.

Honestly, why are you so fixated on this person who has been banned for quite some time?

The Ram is using the exact same lame tactics.

Ok, regardless on whether or not you're right, you've called multiple people Nomad in the past several threads.

You're obsessed.

I apologized for calling you Nomad.
(Though you did use his play book.)

I’m pretty sure the “multiple people” you are talking about only includes yourself and the Ram.

What do you two and Nomad have in common???

Lame argument styles/tactics... check.
Right wing political views... check.
Hatred for being demonstrably wrong... check.
Racist Personality... XXX. Denied, The Ram and Nomad are demonstrably racist. You’ve proven to be better than that.
Hence my apology for mistakenly putting you in that group.

Your failure to realise that nomad ran rings round you daily is to be expected.

You didn't know that a part of pre Versailles treaty Germany was handed to Poland. Instead of admitting that you were wrong, you go back centuries pre Versailles treaty and say it was Prussian. We both know that was not what you originally meant. Hatred for being demonstrably wrong.....CHECK

Calling me a nazi because I pointed out that Hitler reunited parts of pre Versailles treaty Germany. Lame argument style/tactics...CHECK

Your immediate conclusions that you come to, and the fact that you use black wall street as an example of black and white living in harmony. Even though the only thing that made it possible was segregation. Racist personality
..CHECK

[jimboston]

Your failure to realise that nomad ran rings round you daily is to be expected.

OK... sure.

You didn't know that a part of pre Versailles treaty Germany was handed to Poland. Instead of admitting that you were wrong, you go back centuries pre Versailles treaty and say it was Prussian. We both know that was not what you originally meant. Hatred for being demonstrably wrong.....CHECK

You’re rewriting the debate and how this came about. I didn’t bring WW2/Germany into the debate. You did. Here’s how it went...

1) I stated that countries don’t typically go to war to “help” the citizens of the country their going to war with; or improve the ‘human right conditions’ of said people.
2)You tried to prove me wrong, talking about the Allies declaring war on Germany in WW2; basically saying the Allies went to war to protect the people in central Europe or some such nonsense.
3) I pointed out the Allies only went to War after Germany invaded Poland.
4) You defended the actions of the Hitler Regime by claiming that parts of Poland had belonged to Germany.
5) I then proved that...
- Those part of Poland that belonged to Germany also previously belonged to Poland.
- Germany invaded all of Poland, not just the territory they claimed was stolen.
- It’s moot who owned what... the Allies declared war because they finally accept hat Germany was a THREAT TO THEIR OWN INTERESTS.

If Britain and France really cared about the Polish people they would h e declared war BEFORE Germany invaded Poland.

The “why” of Germany invading Poland is moot to the original point.

Furthermore your simple logic of “Germany was just taking back what Versailles stole from them” is flawed in multiple ways... a few of which I have already explained. I’m not (and haven’t) denied the German people were ‘wronged’ by the Treaty of Versailles... it’s obvious they were. That Treaty and its’ aftermath did enable Hitler with PROPAGANDA, LIES, AND FALSE LOGIC to come to power. That Treatyhowever bad does not make Hitler the hero you seem to want him to be.

Calling me a nazi because I pointed out that Hitler reunited parts of pre Versailles treaty Germany. Lame argument style/tactics...CHECK

I called you a Nazi not because you pointed out historical facts... I called you a Nazi because your defending Hitler’s actions.

Yes, the German people were wronged by Versailles. That does not justify Hitler’s actions of an aggressive war of expansion. Even if he stopped at Pre-WW1 boundaries it’d be hard to justify his actions... but he DID NOT STOP at Pre-WW1 boundaries, and he had no intention of ever stopping at Pre-WW1 boundaries.

However, you seem very intent on defending his actions.

It’s like you read all this stuff somewhere... Mein Kampf maybe? Your defense is very similar to the goals stated in his manifesto.

Your immediate conclusions that you come to, and the fact that you use black wall street as an example of black and white living in harmony. Even though the only thing that made it possible was segregation. Racist personality
..CHECK

This is how Nomad thought he ‘won’ too. The racist calling me racist. It’s quite funny.

[Jdsizzleslice]

I apologized for calling you Nomad.
(Though you did use his play book.)

What is his playbook? Jim, you and I both know that if you're going to accuse me of something, the least you can do is back it up.

What do you two and Nomad have in common???

Lame argument styles/tactics... check.
Right wing political views... check.
Hatred for being demonstrably wrong... check.
Racist Personality... XXX. Denied, The Ram and Nomad are demonstrably racist. You’ve proven to be better than that.
Hence my apology for mistakenly putting you in that group.

1) What specifically do you mean by "lame" argumentative tactics? See above for the reasoning behind backing it up.
2) I am conservative, yes. So?
3) Hatred for being wrong, as in I never correct myself or ever am able to see another individual's viewpoint?

So basically, all that I gather is that we share political viewpoints. But yet you aren't over this person, so much as to call other people to whom you disagree this person. Again,you're obsessed. Other people have pointed out to you that over time the way you talk to people has gotten worse and more insulting and more demeaning.

Let's be honest, man. You haven't exactly treated me with the same respect as I have treated you with on this forum. This was shown very plainly here about how you have spoken to me.

[jimboston]

I apologized for calling you Nomad.
(Though you did use his play book.)

What is his playbook? Jim, you and I both know that if you're going to accuse me of something, the least you can do is back it up.

Your way of ‘debating’ is very similar in style to his.

I can’t be bothered to go back and cite line by line to “prove” I’m right.

What do you two and Nomad have in common???

Lame argument styles/tactics... check.
Right wing political views... check.
Hatred for being demonstrably wrong... check.
Racist Personality... XXX. Denied, The Ram and Nomad are demonstrably racist. You’ve proven to be better than that.
Hence my apology for mistakenly putting you in that group.

1) What specifically do you mean by "lame" argumentative tactics? See above for the reasoning behind backing it up.
2) I am conservative, yes. So?
3) Hatred for being wrong, as in I never correct myself or ever am able to see another individual's viewpoint?

So basically, all that I gather is that we share political viewpoints. But yet you aren't over this person, so much as to call other people to whom you disagree this person. Again,you're obsessed. Other people have pointed out to you that over time the way you talk to people has gotten worse and more insulting and more demeaning.

Let's be honest, man. You haven't exactly treated me with the same respect as I have treated you with on this forum. This was shown very plainly here about how you have spoken to me.

wah wah wah

I’m sorry I have no patience for people when they are being dumb.

[Jdsizzleslice]

Your way of ‘debating’ is very similar in style to his.

I can’t be bothered to go back and cite line by line to “prove” I’m right.

You can't be bothered to prove yourself right? That doesn't sound like the Jim I know. Prove yourself right.

wah wah wah

I’m sorry I have no patience for people when they are being dumb.

How am I being dumb? Can you cite line by line to prove that as well?

[The ram]

Your failure to realise that nomad ran rings round you daily is to be expected.

OK... sure.

You didn't know that a part of pre Versailles treaty Germany was handed to Poland. Instead of admitting that you were wrong, you go back centuries pre Versailles treaty and say it was Prussian. We both know that was not what you originally meant. Hatred for being demonstrably wrong.....CHECK

You’re rewriting the debate and how this came about. I didn’t bring WW2/Germany into the debate. You did. Here’s how it went...

1) I stated that countries don’t typically go to war to “help” the citizens of the country their going to war with; or improve the ‘human right conditions’ of said people.
2)You tried to prove me wrong, talking about the Allies declaring war on Germany in WW2; basically saying the Allies went to war to protect the people in central Europe or some such nonsense.
3) I pointed out the Allies only went to War after Germany invaded Poland.
4) You defended the actions of the Hitler Regime by claiming that parts of Poland had belonged to Germany.
5) I then proved that...
- Those part of Poland that belonged to Germany also previously belonged to Poland.
- Germany invaded all of Poland, not just the territory they claimed was stolen.
- It’s moot who owned what... the Allies declared war because they finally accept hat Germany was a THREAT TO THEIR OWN INTERESTS.

If Britain and France really cared about the Polish people they would h e declared war BEFORE Germany invaded Poland.

The “why” of Germany invading Poland is moot to the original point.

Furthermore your simple logic of “Germany was just taking back what Versailles stole from them” is flawed in multiple ways... a few of which I have already explained. I’m not (and haven’t) denied the German people were ‘wronged’ by the Treaty of Versailles... it’s obvious they were. That Treaty and its’ aftermath did enable Hitler with PROPAGANDA, LIES, AND FALSE LOGIC to come to power. That Treatyhowever bad does not make Hitler the hero you seem to want him to be.

Calling me a nazi because I pointed out that Hitler reunited parts of pre Versailles treaty Germany. Lame argument style/tactics...CHECK

I called you a Nazi not because you pointed out historical facts... I called you a Nazi because your defending Hitler’s actions.

Yes, the German people were wronged by Versailles. That does not justify Hitler’s actions of an aggressive war of expansion. Even if he stopped at Pre-WW1 boundaries it’d be hard to justify his actions... but he DID NOT STOP at Pre-WW1 boundaries, and he had no intention of ever stopping at Pre-WW1 boundaries.

However, you seem very intent on defending his actions.

It’s like you read all this stuff somewhere... Mein Kampf maybe? Your defense is very similar to the goals stated in his manifesto.

Your immediate conclusions that you come to, and the fact that you use black wall street as an example of black and white living in harmony. Even though the only thing that made it possible was segregation. Racist personality
..CHECK

This is how Nomad thought he ‘won’ too. The racist calling me racist. It’s quite funny.

I think you'll find that mein kampf was written way before anything that we've discussed.

I've not praised Hitler once. You need to stop jumping to conclusions and using these woefully lame tactics. However, in truth, Hitler did a fantastic job of reinvigorating the German economy. The roads, housing and employment were light years ahead of Britain's. He also didn't declare war, that was the British and French.

We will never know if he would have went further than reuniting the parts of Germany. His hatred of Jews is quite common, they have been chased out of hundreds of places, including my home city of Sunderland, twice. Before you accuse me of anti semitism, I'm only citing history, not my viewpoint.

My actual view of Hitler is, I think he went insane. I wish there had never been a war and we could have seen how national socialism panned out. It seemed to work very well for the people of Germany. His views on eugenics were awful, but it was a commonly held view of both the right and left of that time to neuter the idle and lame to stop them breeding. You probably wouldn't be here had the inbred Franklin D Roosevelt had his way

[jimboston]

How am I being dumb? Can you cite line by line to prove that as well?

I don’t need to cite anything to prove this.
You do. it quite effectively with nearly every post.

I amend my current age estimate from 27 down to 24.

[jimboston]

I think you'll find that mein kampf was written way before anything that we've discussed.

God, you’re not too bright ‘eh?

What does the date of writing / publication have to do with the point made?
Nothing!

It was his ‘manifesto’... in it he wrote extensively about the idea that the German people should be reunited with their ‘traditional homelands’... which in his mind meant reuniting with Austria, and recovering parts of Czechoslovakia, Poland, etc.

This is how he LATER justified his war of aggression and expansion. A goal that you defended.

I've not praised Hitler once. You need to stop jumping to conclusions and using these woefully lame tactics. However, in truth, Hitler did a fantastic job of reinvigorating the German economy. The roads, housing and employment were light years ahead of Britain's.

He also didn't declare war, that was the British and French.

Semantics. He violated the Treaty that ended WW2. He took over Austria politically, and had already invaded Czechoslovakia. He was warned to not invade Poland or there’d be war... he invaded anyway.

He might not have declared war on England and France.

He did declare war on Poland, Czechoslovakia, United States or America, Soviet Union... and a host of smaller countries in Europe.

We will never know if he would have went further than reuniting the parts of Germany.

Really? Please. His invasion of Poland was already ‘further’ because (even if you buy the claim that parts of Poland had been stolen from Germany) he did not just occupy those parts, he occupied the whole country.

He declared war on the US... wasn’t necessary.

He invaded USSR, after signing a peace treaty with them... wasn’t necessary.

You really wanna claim that he would’ve stopped with Poland?

My actual view of Hitler is, I think he went insane. I wish there had never been a war and we could have seen how national socialism panned out. It seemed to work very well for the people of Germany.

This is funny! More Hitler love... it was the war that caused him to go insane.

Yeah it worked very well for the German people? All of them right? Including the Jewish people, people in Germany with Slavic blood, gays, Gypsies, Catholics, etc. Yeah, it was working great for them!

His views on eugenics were awful, but it was a commonly held view of both the right and left of that time to neuter the idle and lame to stop them breeding. You probably wouldn't be here had the inbred Franklin D Roosevelt had his way

FDR was lame do to polio.
If he was inbred it didn’t impact his brain.
He’s no more inbred than your average ‘true blooded Englishman’.

You also have his goals backward... he desperately WANTED war... your comment is saying he wanted to avoid war.
I’m assuming that’s a typo, but if you really believe that you’ve just proven yourself to be more ignorant than previously thought.

[Jdsizzleslice]

I don’t need to cite anything to prove this.
You do. it quite effectively with nearly every post.

I amend my current age estimate from 27 down to 24.

Tsk tsk tsk Jim. You are the embodiment of a broken soul.

Name-calling is a cognitive bias and a technique to promote propaganda. Propagandists use the name-calling technique to invoke fear in those exposed to the propaganda, resulting in the formation of a negative opinion about a person, group, or set of beliefs or ideas. The method is intended to provoke conclusions and actions about a matter apart from an impartial examinations of the facts of the matter. When this tactic is used instead of an argument, name-calling is thus a substitute for rational, fact-based arguments against an idea or belief, based upon its own merits, and becomes an abusive argumentum ad hominem.

Abusive ad hominem argument (or direct ad hominem) is associated with an attack to the character of the person carrying an argument. This kind of argument, besides usually being fallacious, is also counterproductive, as a proper dialogue is hard to achieve after such an attack.

[The ram]

I think you'll find that mein kampf was written way before anything that we've discussed.

God, you’re not too bright ‘eh?

What does the date of writing / publication have to do with the point made?
Nothing!

It was his ‘manifesto’... in it he wrote extensively about the idea that the German people should be reunited with their ‘traditional homelands’... which in his mind meant reuniting with Austria, and recovering parts of Czechoslovakia, Poland, etc.

This is how he LATER justified his war of aggression and expansion. A goal that you defended.

I've not praised Hitler once. You need to stop jumping to conclusions and using these woefully lame tactics. However, in truth, Hitler did a fantastic job of reinvigorating the German economy. The roads, housing and employment were light years ahead of Britain's.

.

Jim if you look at your post prior to this you asked if I got my information from mein kampf. We are talking about events 2 decades after it was written. Try to keep up. Was Hitler some sort of nostradamus who wrote about Britain declaring war on Germany? Every single one of your replies is taken out of context.

I'm not praising Hitler, is that how you read it?

Everything else you wrote is the bias3d stuff I learned as a 12 year old at school. You are an ignorant buffoon who prefers to deny your lack of knowledge, rather than to learn and admit your inadequacies. I don't see any point in going round and round with you. You just stick with your primary school history, it's the truth kid.

[jimboston]

Jim if you look at your post prior to this you asked if I got my information from mein kampf. We are talking about events 2 decades after it was written. Try to keep up. Was Hitler some sort of nostradamus who wrote about Britain declaring war on Germany? Every single one of your replies is taken out of context.

I asked if you read Mein Kampf because all your talking points... i.e. “Hitler was just reclaiming stolen German land!” are straight outta that book.

You sound as if you’ve bought into his propaganda hook, line, and sinker.

I'm not praising Hitler, is that how you read it?

I've not praised Hitler once. You need to stop jumping to conclusions and using these woefully lame tactics. However, in truth, Hitler did a fantastic job of reinvigorating the German economy. The roads, housing and employment were light years ahead of Britain's.

I don’t know how else to read what you wrote.

“Hitler did a fantastic job...”

Sounds like praise to me...

[The ram]

Bodycam footage of floyd's arrest

https://youtu.be/YPSwqp5fdIw

No racism, just a man high as a kite on uppers trying to resist arrest. He's brought out of his car and constantly claims he can't get into a police car because he's claustrophobic.

This is another complete idiot. Capitalism is racism kiddies. We need a black militia for education. You really couldn't make this shit up


https://youtu.be/XqWGlLKCxE8

[jimboston]

Bodycam footage of floyd's arrest

https://youtu.be/YPSwqp5fdIw

No racism, just a man high as a kite on uppers trying to resist arrest. He's brought out of his car and constantly claims he can't get into a police car because he's claustrophobic.

This is another complete idiot. Capitalism is racism kiddies. We need a black militia for education. You really couldn't make this shit up


https://youtu.be/XqWGlLKCxE8

and so because he’s high it’s ok to kill him?

He’s handcuffed on the ground... how is he resisting?