jimboston wrote:spurgistan wrote:Resisting arrest isn't a capital offense, dude. A man running away with a taser is not...
... a threat to anybody's immediate safety - the only reason to use deadly force.
Define “immediate”... because depending on how you define that I may agree or disagree.
I’m not saying the death was good or justified... at the same time, why did the guy resist?
I’m not saying the police were right, but...
... if he hadn’t gone drinking and driving he’d be alive today.
(BTW, a drunk driver is an immediate threat to people’s safety.)
... if he hadn’t resisted arrest he’d be alive today.
... if he hadn’t stolen the officer’s taser AND fired it at the officer he’s be alive today.
I think there’s a lot of ‘blame’ to go around. Most of those decisions (on both sides) were made into the moment.
Though the first, the guy choosing to drink and drive, was premeditated.spurgistan wrote:Also, we shouldn't need to have ride alongs, we should have a new system of policing that leads from the community instead of basically being occupation tactics. This. Isn't. Working.
A lot of people say things like “community policing”... I’ve yet to hear someone describe how it’s different than our current system... or how it would work in the real world of a major American city.
LEOs are supposed to have training. It shouldn't be decisions made in the moment, it should be trained that a taser is by definition not something that poses an immediate threat to the life of the officer, and so cannot be responded to with lethal force. Not even that, blame the series of events that led to that, starting with calling the cops on a sleeping black man. Drunk drivers are behaving irrationally by definition. You can't expect the drunk driver to have a cool head.
Sorry about the community policing thing, thought you could Google. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_policing