Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Should have married someone that wouldn't cheat! Damn....forgot to ask that question when we were dating. LMFAO. Dork.
As to picking a bad person to deal with in business. Here's one.
I bought my company from my neighbor. Before that, I was a commercial lender, CPA and VP at a local national bank. I managed a 200 million dollar portfolio. I know how to analyze a business and it's owners. This was before automated, box checking lending, when we actually had to think, work, and be responsible for lending out YOUR money. My dad and brother helped me research and make this decision. Dad a $500 an hour CPA and partner Ina big 5 firm. Also CEO of a small local bank and on multiple boards. Brother CEO of a large identity safeguard biz, also on many boards
I knew my neighbor intimately for 10 years before this. I helped him as a friend design and patent the product. I helped him with the financial side and taxes
He got sick (terminal). We were having our first child. Made the call.
Turns out he fucked me hard in the ass. Knew several situations coming up that fucked this business. Very convenient he got the terminal illness...timed it just right. Thankfully, it was drawn out and painful....this guy was Satan and his wife was worse.
We had NO clue. His his real nature for 10 years. Buffaloed 3 savvy business men. Lied like a rug. Nothing in hindsight could have brought this to light....nothing.
I spent 100% of my money, including my retirement, to defend myself. My alternative was to lose the business AND my home AND my shitty vacation property.
I prevailed in that he didn't win, but it cost a LOT.
25 years later I've made this biz my life, my identity and something I am proud of even if I'm not rich. I could have easily lost everything.
And no one in this world could have figured he was a bad business partner. I'm not homeless but I'm a hell of a lot worse off FINANCIALLY. I am rich beyond measure as Ive had the luxury of working from home and being Mr Mom and being there to raise my sons 100% of the time, and they have gtrown into beautiful, hard working, honest young men that I am SO proud of. Anyway....
Now lecture me on how I went wrong. And DO NOT presume to say "you shouldn't have bought the business", or we WILL have words. This is a 30 year story crammed into a few useless paragraphs....
KoolBak wrote:PS...this is where NoPat would lecture me about posting personal shit and end with a threat.
Oh wait....he already did that. And he's not here
Also really dumb to insinuate you're gonna go by someones house that you know is extremely well armed and willing.......lol
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
jimboston wrote:if the decision is “Go crawl back to your abusive father or die in a snow bank on the street.” I was simply stating that in the moment (based on your comments) it was essentially pride (and maybe fear or regret) that made you choose the snowball.
People don’t “choose” to have a wife or business partner cheat on them. They do however choose the wife or business partner in the first place. So I would argue that this TV guy made a BAD CHOICE in selecting his wife, and another BAD CHOICE in selecting his business partner. Things like that can (possibly) come out of left-field and blind-side a guy... but more likely there were signs the guy completely missed.
jonesthecurl wrote:Not to be too judgemental myself, but it seems to me that you're deciding things are bad decisions based on the outcome. While that's useful as a classification, it doesn't help while you're making the decision.
KoolBak wrote:For gods sake Boston. Get over yourself. That NP comment was meant to be humorous. Not everyones out to get you![]()
KoolBak wrote:
My POINT, zeke, was that choosing a bad business partner is not a simple matter of NOT doing your homework. Or making a flawed decision. Shit happens. Just like in relationships. You paint a black and white world that doesnt exist.
KoolBak wrote:
Also...I am not trying to say YOURE WRONG. IM RIGHT. Actually dont give a squirt of piss about your opinion. Just trying to conversate and give an example of a gray area.
KoolBak wrote:
Done arguing with you....find someone else.
mrswdk wrote:People don’t “choose” to have a wife or business partner cheat on them. They do however choose the wife or business partner in the first place. So I would argue that this TV guy made a BAD CHOICE in selecting his wife, and another BAD CHOICE in selecting his business partner. Things like that can (possibly) come out of left-field and blind-side a guy... but more likely there were signs the guy completely missed.
This sounds exactly like WMW declaring that women raped by Harvey Weinstein were '25% to blame' for putting themselves in the position to get raped.
jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:People don’t “choose” to have a wife or business partner cheat on them. They do however choose the wife or business partner in the first place. So I would argue that this TV guy made a BAD CHOICE in selecting his wife, and another BAD CHOICE in selecting his business partner. Things like that can (possibly) come out of left-field and blind-side a guy... but more likely there were signs the guy completely missed.
This sounds exactly like WMW declaring that women raped by Harvey Weinstein were '25% to blame' for putting themselves in the position to get raped.
No. I disagree. I’m not assessing blame.
The guy whose wife cheated on him is the victim of a cheater.
The wife is to blame.
(At least based on the info we have assuming he didn’t cheat on her previously or something.)
The point I am saying is.... that guy... later... will HIMSELF admit... “Marrying that bitch was one of the worst decisions of my life.”
Do you agree?
In your example. The victim of an assault or rape by Harvey (or any other predator) is still 100% the victim.
... but that person will likely say to themselves later “I should’ve...”
In SOME cases (some not all) yes, the person may have put themselves in a situation where they were made more vulnerable to assault.
That doesn’t shift the blame... but it is true.
mrswdk wrote:Like jones said, hindsight is a wonderful thing but someone who gets involved with people who turn out to be bad for them obviously didn't know what they were getting into at the time.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
mrswdk wrote:So you make a statement, ask if I agree with it, and then when I tell you I disagree you say it's irrelevant anyway.
KoolBak wrote:Keep trying Mr.....we believe in you!
jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:So you make a statement, ask if I agree with it, and then when I tell you I disagree you say it's irrelevant anyway.
GFY
I’m not going to engage with you when you try to manipulate my words.
Don’t play dumb.
mrswdk wrote:jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:So you make a statement, ask if I agree with it, and then when I tell you I disagree you say it's irrelevant anyway.
GFY
I’m not going to engage with you when you try to manipulate my words.
Don’t play dumb.
Accuses people of putting words in his mouth after they quote him verbatim. Classic jim![]()
jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:So you make a statement, ask if I agree with it, and then when I tell you I disagree you say it's irrelevant anyway.
GFY
I’m not going to engage with you when you try to manipulate my words.
Don’t play dumb.
Accuses people of putting words in his mouth after they quote him verbatim. Classic jim![]()
At NO POINT did you quote me verbatim.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee