what,me worry? wrote:What mean to say when I say the devil is in the details:
Mod Edit: (Razorvich)
I was going to post a point-by-point refutation of the post, but it’s a waste of energy and will ultimately end in frustration when WMW agrees with me but then decides that what he said wasn’t what he meant, and that we all just don’t understand.
Examples...
WMW: “Most of the world practices Islam”
-> When this point is refuted and it’s shown that only about 24% of the world’s population is in fact Islamic.
WMW: “Numbers don’t tell the full story... the number of Christians around the world does not equal the force of Muslims around the world... We’re talking two different animals...”
So when you prove he’s wrong, that in fact “Most of the world” does not practice Islam, he then essentially says that doesn’t matter, and what he meant was that the “force” of Muslims is greater than the force of Christians.
Now I could. prove this wrong too... and could lay out a religious war scenario where say what we might consider “Western” or “Christian” countries went to war with “Muslim/Islamic” countries... and if there was such a full on war how the “Western/Christian” countries would win...
Let’s say... USA, France, Spain, Germany, Australia... versus Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, etc., etc.
I think we’d all be losers... but I think the “Islamic/Muslim” countries would lose worse.
He’d then say “that isn’t what I meant”.
—-
It’s like arguing with a 4yo!—-
All his posts... 1-5 for both Christianity and Islam can easily be refuted... but it’s a wasted effort.
This guy is so brainwashed and simplistic in his thinking.
It makes me sad to be American and wishes we could institute an IQ test prior to allowing voter registration.