Leftist Congressional Candidate endorses Beastialitality.. -

[NomadPatriot]

It's because they are trying to infect children with AIDS. Mrswdk wrote about that in the homophobia thread which was then moved to the TrashCan and then deleted along with that forum.

Tom Rubnitz, the drag queen/probable pedophile, when describing why he made queer propaganda for children:

I wanted to make things beautiful, funny and [HIV] positive

http://www.vdb.org/titles/tom-rubnitz-v ... y-desserty

below in blue is the entire text from the article you linked.. it says nothing about him being Gay, kids, children, Pedophilia, or making anything 'HIV' positive... it just notes he was a drag queen who got famous for making quirky videos and just happened to have HIV..

he would fall into the same category as Erving Magic Johnson, Greg Louganis or Charlie Sheen... --> someone who got famous doing something who just happened to have HIV

" Until his untimely death from AIDS in 1992, Tom Rubnitz produced short, humourous videotapes featuring some of New York’s most outrageously talented musicians, artists and drag queens. Influenced by mass media entertainment, Rubnitz crafted hilarious videos which simultaneously celebrated and parodied pop culture’s bountiful energy and inventiveness. As Tom said, “I wanted to make things beautiful, funny and positive—escapes that you could just get into and laugh through. That was really important to me. I felt like good could triumph over evil.” We hope that this compilation will extend Tom’s critically important, uplifiting and ground-breaking work to new audiences who have never had the privilege or pure pleasure of witnessing these exhilarating videos.

The quintessential New York underground collection of film/video artiste, Tom Rubnitz. In this compilation Rubnitz takes a bite out of the Big Apple and spits it out in a wild kaleidoscope of unequivocal camp and hallucinogenic color.

“Inimitable and ineffable, Tom Rubnitz’s glitter-dusted videos distill the sensibility of a generation of TV babies whose venue of choice was the Pyramid Club rather than the Whitney Museum.”

—Village Voice

[DoomYoshi]

"just happened" to have the disease which is spread by unrestrained male sexuality.

[NomadPatriot]

"just happened" to have the disease which is spread by unrestrained male sexuality.

good gosh that is the most contrived statement I have seen in a while...

because you can not conceive HIV could be spread by Women, by sharing needles w/ someone who is infected, getting stuck with a infected needle or from a infected tattoo needle,

or that HIV also can passed from mother to child during pregnancy, childbirth, or breastfeeding.

nope.. according to you.. only gay sex does it..

[riskllama]

don't forget about toilet seats - you can get it from that, too. pretty sure, anyways...

[NomadPatriot]

don't forget about toilet seats - you can get it from that, too. pretty sure, anyways...

no Llama... no STD's are transmitted via a toilet seat.. std related viruses die in about 5-15 seconds on a toilet seat...


hence the "S"... it stands for 'Sexually'

but if you jump on a toilet seat before the person who just used it even has time to flush it.. then I guess .. maybe..
that might be the Canadian way..

[The ram]

I've always said that the LGBTQ nonsense is the gateway to legalise paedophilia. Gays are more likely to be paedophiles, when homosexuality was legalized here in Britain an organisation called PIE thought the time was right for it to be legal, it was too early but you know it's coming.

Exploiting a half-truth, at best.

While it is true that among pedophiles, a greater percentage are gay than straight, the converse is not true. There is no special tendency to pedophilia among normal (teleiophilic -- attracted to adult) gays. Both gay teleiophiles and straight teleiophiles show the same (very low) rate of interest in children.

For a balanced discussion:
https://individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

The only ever survey done by free paedophiles for paedophiles revealed that paedophiles are predominantly gay!

You can be a good little sheep and try to distort that information any way you want for it to justify that gayness is good.

[NomadPatriot]

I've always said that the LGBTQ nonsense is the gateway to legalise paedophilia. Gays are more likely to be paedophiles, when homosexuality was legalized here in Britain an organisation called PIE thought the time was right for it to be legal, it was too early but you know it's coming.

Exploiting a half-truth, at best.

While it is true that among pedophiles, a greater percentage are gay than straight, the converse is not true. There is no special tendency to pedophilia among normal (teleiophilic -- attracted to adult) gays. Both gay teleiophiles and straight teleiophiles show the same (very low) rate of interest in children.

For a balanced discussion:
https://individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

The only ever survey done by free paedophiles for paedophiles revealed that paedophiles are predominantly gay!

You can be a good little sheep and try to distort that information any way you want for it to justify that gayness is good.

feel free to reference this survey...

but odd you re-arranged what you said.. .
1st you said "Gays are more likely to be paedophiles"
now your saying a survey says " paedophiles are predominantly gay "

that is 2 different things..

if we are to believe you.. just because pedo's are prominently gay doesn't mean gays are more likely to be one..

[NomadPatriot]

ironically...

Yep, They're Gay

A study of homosexual sheep has raised the ire of everyone from gay activists to PETA. John Cloud wonders why

Zoologists have known for many years that homosexuality isn't uncommon among animals. (My own cat has raised suspicions ever since he tried to mount a cowering male dachshund.) But I was surprised to learn recently that male sheep exhibit homosexuality at least as often as humans: roughly 8% of rams turn out to have sex exclusively with other rams.

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1582336,00.html

(on a further note...)


What percentage of people are gay?
Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

--> Rams are 225% more likely to be Gay than Humans...

[The ram]

I've always said that the LGBTQ nonsense is the gateway to legalise paedophilia. Gays are more likely to be paedophiles, when homosexuality was legalized here in Britain an organisation called PIE thought the time was right for it to be legal, it was too early but you know it's coming.

Exploiting a half-truth, at best.

While it is true that among pedophiles, a greater percentage are gay than straight, the converse is not true. There is no special tendency to pedophilia among normal (teleiophilic -- attracted to adult) gays. Both gay teleiophiles and straight teleiophiles show the same (very low) rate of interest in children.

For a balanced discussion:
https://individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

The only ever survey done by free paedophiles for paedophiles revealed that paedophiles are predominantly gay!

You can be a good little sheep and try to distort that information any way you want for it to justify that gayness is good.

feel free to reference this survey...

but odd you re-arranged what you said.. .
1st you said "Gays are more likely to be paedophiles"
now your saying a survey says " paedophiles are predominantly gay "

that is 2 different things..

if we are to believe you.. just because pedo's are prominently gay doesn't mean gays are more likely to be one..

https://www.boywiki.org/fr/Paedophile_I ... %C3%A9gral)

[NomadPatriot]

I've always said that the LGBTQ nonsense is the gateway to legalise paedophilia. Gays are more likely to be paedophiles, when homosexuality was legalized here in Britain an organisation called PIE thought the time was right for it to be legal, it was too early but you know it's coming.

Exploiting a half-truth, at best.

While it is true that among pedophiles, a greater percentage are gay than straight, the converse is not true. There is no special tendency to pedophilia among normal (teleiophilic -- attracted to adult) gays. Both gay teleiophiles and straight teleiophiles show the same (very low) rate of interest in children.

For a balanced discussion:
https://individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

The only ever survey done by free paedophiles for paedophiles revealed that paedophiles are predominantly gay!

You can be a good little sheep and try to distort that information any way you want for it to justify that gayness is good.

feel free to reference this survey...

but odd you re-arranged what you said.. .
1st you said "Gays are more likely to be paedophiles"
now your saying a survey says " paedophiles are predominantly gay "

that is 2 different things..

if we are to believe you.. just because pedo's are prominently gay doesn't mean gays are more likely to be one..

https://www.boywiki.org/fr/Paedophile_I ... %C3%A9gral)

your source of information is the --> European Boylove Homepage

[The ram]

I've always said that the LGBTQ nonsense is the gateway to legalise paedophilia. Gays are more likely to be paedophiles, when homosexuality was legalized here in Britain an organisation called PIE thought the time was right for it to be legal, it was too early but you know it's coming.

Exploiting a half-truth, at best.

While it is true that among pedophiles, a greater percentage are gay than straight, the converse is not true. There is no special tendency to pedophilia among normal (teleiophilic -- attracted to adult) gays. Both gay teleiophiles and straight teleiophiles show the same (very low) rate of interest in children.

For a balanced discussion:
https://individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

The only ever survey done by free paedophiles for paedophiles revealed that paedophiles are predominantly gay!

You can be a good little sheep and try to distort that information any way you want for it to justify that gayness is good.

feel free to reference this survey...

but odd you re-arranged what you said.. .
1st you said "Gays are more likely to be paedophiles"
now your saying a survey says " paedophiles are predominantly gay "

that is 2 different things..

if we are to believe you.. just because pedo's are prominently gay doesn't mean gays are more likely to be one..

https://www.boywiki.org/fr/Paedophile_I ... %C3%A9gral)

your source of information is the --> European Boylove Homepage

You asked for the survey. I googled paedophile information exchange survey and that's the page that came up. Slowly, information is getting more difficult to access on the net but maybe the fact it's on a gay site gives you an insight into what interests these people

[DoomYoshi]

Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

That is a notoriously difficult number to quantify. However, I've never seen a non-politically motivated study that puts the number any higher than 1%. For example, in Canada, approximately 0.8% of couples are "same-sex". Yet the words bride and groom are no longer legal terms (in a sense, that makes them ex-legal terms, or illegal terms). They have been replaced by applicant and co-applicant to pander to the 0.3% of people in Canada who might engage in same-sex marriage.

If 3.5% of people are gay, that means that the remaining 2.7% are not encoupled because they are pedophiles.

[NomadPatriot]

Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

That is a notoriously difficult number to quantify. However, I've never seen a non-politically motivated study that puts the number any higher than 1%. For example, in Canada, approximately 0.8% of couples are "same-sex". Yet the words bride and groom are no longer legal terms (in a sense, that makes them ex-legal terms, or illegal terms). They have been replaced by applicant and co-applicant to pander to the 0.3% of people in Canada who might engage in same-sex marriage.

If 3.5% of people are gay, that means that the remaining 2.7% are not encoupled because they are pedophiles.

sounds about right 1% for each category, 1% gay, 1% lesbian.. 1.5% bisexual..
doing a "couples" survey doesn't yield actual number of LGBT individuals.. that would be like defining straight people in society by asking married couples only..

[nietzsche]

Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

That is a notoriously difficult number to quantify. However, I've never seen a non-politically motivated study that puts the number any higher than 1%. For example, in Canada, approximately 0.8% of couples are "same-sex". Yet the words bride and groom are no longer legal terms (in a sense, that makes them ex-legal terms, or illegal terms). They have been replaced by applicant and co-applicant to pander to the 0.3% of people in Canada who might engage in same-sex marriage.

If 3.5% of people are gay, that means that the remaining 2.7% are not encoupled because they are pedophiles.

or ugly.

[DoomYoshi]

Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

That is a notoriously difficult number to quantify. However, I've never seen a non-politically motivated study that puts the number any higher than 1%. For example, in Canada, approximately 0.8% of couples are "same-sex". Yet the words bride and groom are no longer legal terms (in a sense, that makes them ex-legal terms, or illegal terms). They have been replaced by applicant and co-applicant to pander to the 0.3% of people in Canada who might engage in same-sex marriage.

If 3.5% of people are gay, that means that the remaining 2.7% are not encoupled because they are pedophiles.

sounds about right 1% for each category, 1% gay, 1% lesbian.. 1.5% bisexual..
doing a "couples" survey doesn't yield actual number of LGBT individuals.. that would be like defining straight people in society by asking married couples only..

No, it doesn't sound about right. It sounds about wrong.

[NomadPatriot]

Key findings from the research brief are as follows: An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender.

That is a notoriously difficult number to quantify. However, I've never seen a non-politically motivated study that puts the number any higher than 1%. For example, in Canada, approximately 0.8% of couples are "same-sex". Yet the words bride and groom are no longer legal terms (in a sense, that makes them ex-legal terms, or illegal terms). They have been replaced by applicant and co-applicant to pander to the 0.3% of people in Canada who might engage in same-sex marriage.

If 3.5% of people are gay, that means that the remaining 2.7% are not encoupled because they are pedophiles.

sounds about right 1% for each category, 1% gay, 1% lesbian.. 1.5% bisexual..
doing a "couples" survey doesn't yield actual number of LGBT individuals.. that would be like defining straight people in society by asking married couples only..

No, it doesn't sound about right. It sounds about wrong.

May 22, 2018


In U.S., Estimate of LGBT Population Rises to 4.5%

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The percentage of American adults identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) increased to 4.5% in 2017, up from 4.1% in 2016 and 3.5% in 2012 when Gallup began tracking the measure. The latest estimate is based on over 340,000 interviews conducted as part of Gallup's daily tracking in 2017.

Gallup's LGBT estimates are based on those respondents who say "yes" when asked, "Do you, personally, identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender?" Extrapolation to the latest census estimate of adults 18 and older in the U.S. suggests that more than 11 million adults identify as LGBT in the country today.

The expansion in the number of Americans who identify as LGBT is driven primarily by the cohort of millennials, defined as those born between 1980 and 1999. The percentage of millennials who identify as LGBT expanded from 7.3% to 8.1% from 2016 to 2017, and is up from 5.8% in 2012. By contrast, the LGBT percentage in Generation X (those born from 1965 to 1979) was up only .2% from 2016 to 2017. There was no change last year in LGBT percentage among baby boomers (born 1946 through 1964) and traditionalists (born prior to 1946).

https://news.gallup.com/poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspx

[DoomYoshi]

The thing about millenials is that they are lying though. They just pretend to be gay to pander to the left. Or they experiment. That's why I'm seriously worried about the latest fad being sex changes. At least when the fad was Pokemon cards or vaping these are things that you can leave behind. People are putting their entire lives at risk just because they want to be cool.

It's like how everyone is part Irish on St. Patrick's day - everyone is gay on Pedophile day, which is any day that ends in a 'y' as long as the AIDS brigade keeps winning.

[NomadPatriot]

The thing about millenials is that they are lying though. They just pretend to be gay to pander to the left. Or they experiment. That's why I'm seriously worried about the latest fad being sex changes. At least when the fad was Pokemon cards or vaping these are things that you can leave behind. People are putting their entire lives at risk just because they want to be cool.

It's like how everyone is part Irish on St. Patrick's day - everyone is gay on Pedophile day, which is any day that ends in a 'y' as long as the AIDS brigade keeps winning.

so you reference studies when you see a number you like and use the results of that study to defend your position on the subject
but when another study contradicts your argument. you say the people are lying & studies cannot be used to calculate results of the subject.

odd how your 'un-linked imaginary study" gives you the results you like..
but my linked Gallup Poll study contradicts it.. and you say it is contrived.

just because you seem to be scared of gays doesn't mean what you are saying is in any way correct.

oh and by the way .. 18-24 year old adults are not referred to as millennials anymore.. they are Generation Z...

Generation Z is the demographic cohort following Generation Y, also known as the Millennials or the Millennial Generation; other names suggested for the cohort include iGeneration (iGen), Gen Tech, Gen Wii, Net Gen, Digital Natives and Plurals.

The dates given for Generation Z range from the mid-1990s through the second decade of this century, although precise years vary according to the source. At over two billion individuals, Generation Z is the most populous generational cohort of all time.


https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/Generation-Z

[Dukasaur]

The thing about millenials is that they are lying though. They just pretend to be gay to pander to the left. Or they experiment. That's why I'm seriously worried about the latest fad being sex changes. At least when the fad was Pokemon cards or vaping these are things that you can leave behind. People are putting their entire lives at risk just because they want to be cool.

I really don't think that someone is going get his genitals cut off just to be cool. I really can't imagine it. It may be a small factor in their decision, 0.001% of the total decision, but if someone is happy with their genitals they're not giving them up that easily.

In order to go under a knife, I think a person would have to hate their own genitalia, which means they may, in fact, be suffering from gender dysphoria, and gender reassignment may, in fact, be the best chance at a positive outcome for them.