tzor wrote:jimboston wrote:If all the kids who played American Football stopped and started playing Football/Soccer and Rugby instead... the USA would win the World Cup in 15-20 years in both Sports.
Rugby is a common sport among many colleges in the US, it just doesn't have that "division 1" support.
(Then again Division 1 Hockey in the US is like completely ignored ... even the "Frozen Four" ...)
Association Football (which using the English method of word shortening became "Soccer") is more popular among girls who have no chance whatsoever at anything professional (and only ungrateful whiny *BEEP* wind up on the USA team). Other than scholarships it is generally ignored at the college level.
corrections...
1) Rugby is not ‘common’ on US college campuses.
It exists. I played it as a club sport in college.
It wasn’t and isn’t “common”... we had to travel quite a bit because there were not a lot of teams.
Flag football leagues are more common, shit Harry Potter’s Quidditch might be more common than Rugby.
—-
2) Rugby does exist as a D1 sport in some colleges.
It’s just not as prevalent and there’s no money in it.
—-
My point is that if European Football (i.e. Soccer) or Rugby was played by kids instead of American Football... it would not take the USA long to dominate those sports.
Your example of women’s soccer is perfect... women’s soccer is essentially the female version of football here in the USA.
As such it gets money and attention for girls... and therefore we field a world class team.
Just saying Americans are “too weak” to play Rugby is ridiculous. Imagine Gronk as a Halfback?