riskllama wrote:you like the rasslin', NP?
no not a fan.. I was when I was 7.. back in the 1980's..
more of a UFC fan these days..
only sport worth watching
Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:you like the rasslin', NP?
NomadPatriot wrote:
I already said it's pointless to conversate with you JP.. no clue why you keep trying...
but I will toss you a bone..
when you are wanting to post a YouTube video..
you have to delete the front portion of the link and insert it into the YouTube brackets..
you claim to be so smart.. yet .. you do not know how to do the simplest of things..![]()
step #1: take the YouTube link you copied from the share function on YouTube --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAEppFUWLfc
step #2; shorten it to this --> NAEppFUWLfc
step #3: insert it into the middle of these --> [YouTube][/YouTube]
step #4: and voila.. you get this
-->
-----------------------
ok, lesson over for today JP.. come back anytime you need me to teach you something else..![]()
jusplay4fun wrote:so being ignorant or not taking time to add color or a better way to post does not make me a simpleton. I could have taken time to do a better post, but it was INTENTIONAL, to get you to hear song in the link. You fell for my trap.
jusplay4fun wrote:I am not a frequent poster like you..... It takes two days and a posting shortcut that brings you back to engage me
jusplay4fun wrote:Further, I never claimed to be smart
riskllama wrote:you should try being nicer to people, NP - after all, it wasn’t too terribly long ago that the community, raz, in particular, had to educate you on the very same thing.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
NomadPatriot wrote:riskllama wrote:you should try being nicer to people, NP - after all, it wasn’t too terribly long ago that the community, raz, in particular, had to educate you on the very same thing.
so, Dave.. you think directly quoting people.. is not being nice.. ?
this .. community.. Raz in particular.. thinks quoting people directly is something that needs to be controlled and isn't a nice thing to do..
saying " I already said it is pointless to conversate with you"... & avoiding conflict with someone I do not like is not being nice.. ?
educating JP on how to properly post YouTube videos is not being nice..?
… what exactly haven't I been nice about in regards to JP.. Dave ..?
jusplay4fun wrote:
[youtube]v=_NYFq7ZJg4c[/youtube]
JP4Fun
jusplay4fun wrote: He tries to debate and hopes to score paints
jusplay4fun wrote:NomadP:
And when he LOST the debate on this thread, and cannot answer ANY of my suppositions or debate the facts presented by several individuals here, what does NomadP do? He starts another thread with a new twist, hoping to twist the debate on his favorite and more favorable ground. And what is that ground? the definition of "Settled" science and a "settled" matter (...in the thread on Harsh Winter....). https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=231174&start=25
NomadP lost the debate here in this forum thread and cannot use facts or logic, so he runs away to a "warmer" thread (that he started the last day he posted to this thread). He tries to debate and hopes to score paints by focusing on minutia and ignoring facts and ignoring the big picture about man-made Global Warming caused by the release of Greenhouse gases, CO2 in particular, by burning fossil fuels. And he totally ignores (at best) or simply does not understand Duk's arguments about the PACE or RATE of change.
NomadP 1) does not understand science or 2) chooses to ignore "inconvenient" facts. And 3) he cannot or 4) refuses to write in complete sentences; that is too difficult for him, it seems, for whatever reason.
My only positive comment is that NomadP is not as vile or disgusting as the fake burn.
NomadP is not worth debating; he ignores the facts and cannot use logic. Hence, I will leave him with these thoughts and will ignore him for at least several days.
JP4Fun
jusplay4fun wrote:It is happening, despite your pronouncements and denials.
I am pleased that you saved my PM from nearly 6 months ago; it must really be important to you to debate me and give a weak attempt at refutation. Try again; you refutations, arguments, logic, and command of facts are all very poor.
I will give you an "C+" for effort; "F" for accomplishments at refutation and debate and rhetoric. Odd that you will not discuss things with me, but feel a need to reply to me within 24 hour or less. Keep on NOT discussing things with me, O Weak One.
JP4Fun
NomadPatriot wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:It is happening, despite your pronouncements and denials.
I am pleased that you saved my PM from nearly 6 months ago; it must really be important to you to debate me and give a weak attempt at refutation. Try again; you refutations, arguments, logic, and command of facts are all very poor.
I will give you an "C+" for effort; "F" for accomplishments at refutation and debate and rhetoric. Odd that you will not discuss things with me, but feel a need to reply to me within 24 hour or less. Keep on NOT discussing things with me, O Weak One.
JP4Fun
Superiority Complex
NOUN
an attitude of superiority which conceals actual feelings of inferiority and failure.
jusplay4fun wrote:Yes, that describes noMADp very well. Sorry, noMADp, you are indeed inferior and a failure, too.
For one who claims that I attempt to read minds, you cannot read my mind, despite all your feeble attempts.
BTW: it is good to know that you are not engaged in conversations with me, in TWO thread. Because you feel COMPELLED to respond to nearly all my posts in those two threads.
JP4F
NomadPatriot wrote:
Attention seeking
Attention seeking (also called drawing attention or garnering attention) is behaving in a way that is likely to elicit attention, usually to hearten oneself by being in the limelight or to elicit validation from others.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:
Attention seeking
Attention seeking (also called drawing attention or garnering attention) is behaving in a way that is likely to elicit attention, usually to hearten oneself by being in the limelight or to elicit validation from others.
I think we can all agree you've described yourself perfectly here Nomad
NomadPatriot wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:
Attention seeking
Attention seeking (also called drawing attention or garnering attention) is behaving in a way that is likely to elicit attention, usually to hearten oneself by being in the limelight or to elicit validation from others.
I think we can all agree you've described yourself perfectly here Nomad
but of course you will .. I am the enemy you need..
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:
Attention seeking
Attention seeking (also called drawing attention or garnering attention) is behaving in a way that is likely to elicit attention, usually to hearten oneself by being in the limelight or to elicit validation from others.
I think we can all agree you've described yourself perfectly here Nomad
but of course you will .. I am the enemy you need..
Nah bro, we really don't need you. Was just fine before you got here, and will be just fine when you leave. Besides there are plenty of more coherent and intelligent posters that I don't agree with politically that would make far better enemies if that's really what i wanted (tzor comes to mind)
You do this for your own 'attention whore' reasons, you don't do it for my needs
NomadPatriot wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:
Attention seeking
Attention seeking (also called drawing attention or garnering attention) is behaving in a way that is likely to elicit attention, usually to hearten oneself by being in the limelight or to elicit validation from others.
I think we can all agree you've described yourself perfectly here Nomad
but of course you will .. I am the enemy you need..
Nah bro, we really don't need you. Was just fine before you got here, and will be just fine when you leave. Besides there are plenty of more coherent and intelligent posters that I don't agree with politically that would make far better enemies if that's really what i wanted (tzor comes to mind)
You do this for your own 'attention whore' reasons, you don't do it for my needs
yet.. here you are... repeatedly directing comments towards me in order to get more attention from me...
you direct a comment towards me, so I reply..
you direct another comment towards me. so I reply again..
… no one is forcing you to continually direct comments towards me..
no one was talking to you in the 1st place..
your Nomad-Fetish is urging for more.. .it's telling you to .. 'insert yourself' into the conversation...
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:
I'm here because I play the actual game. Sometime I visit the forums after taking turns.
You are here for one thing only... attention.
Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl