Obama Living What He Preaches

[NomadPatriot]

NP....You are indeed one ignorant motherfucker. Have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. Just too painful. Certainly not worth the apparent little time I have left.

Goodbye opinionated tool

you start out the conversation with me in this thread by attempting to insult me by calling me " explain boy".. and that is you 'trying to give me the benefit of the doubt'...

ok
gotcha..

but good to know you are not an individual with your own .. opinions.
because being opinion-less is the exact definition of a Tool..
genius..


I haven't been called a MF in a while... last time I f-ed a mother was about 3 years ago.. she was in her early 40's & her nearly 60 year old husband just couldn't' get it up anymore....
honestly ..I prefer 100% a$$hole..

glad I could pull that profanity out of you..
it was way too easy to crawl up under your skin.. Koolio

next time don't pick fights with dogs you cannot handle. stay on the porch..

[mrswdk]

her grandchild would be 16.. typical age of a girl an 18 year old guy would most likely be dating.

Nothing to see here, just NP salivating over teenage girls again. Bernie's ears must be berning.

[NomadPatriot]

her grandchild would be 16.. typical age of a girl an 18 year old guy would most likely be dating.

Nothing to see here, just NP salivating over teenage girls again. Bernie's ears must be berning.

awww. Ma'am is thinking about me again..
Ma'am.. you know you are not supposed to double up on those Estrogen pills..

[spurgistan]

Let me know when President Obama or his family start complaining about high marginal tax rates, then this will be hypocrisy. It's ok to have money, it's the complaining (and funding the Republican party to make sure that taxes are illegal) that the tax man takes away your eighth house is the problem.

[jimboston]

Some people have kids at 18 (or younger), some wait till 40 (or longer).
Who the f*ck cares?
I don’t, so long as you re financially able to support your kids, and emotionally/mentally mature enough to rise them to be contributing citizens/humans.

Biologically women are probably best suited to giving birth from like 15-25... but some are naturally capable of conceiving and giving birth much later.
My mother had me naturally at the age of 40yo. before there were things likes Invitro.

Men are biologically capable much longer, but in most men the potency of spermatozoa drops significantly after the age of 40.

Obviously genetics, general health, diet, and other environmental factors (like stress) impact these ages substantially.

Nowadays, with modern medicine, woman can get pregnant much later more easily... which has both good and bad consequences.

Different classes in different parts of the world (and in different parts of the country) have different standards for what they think is ‘normal’.
In Nomad’s case he thinks having a kid at 40 is weird... but amongst my peers (Upper Middle Class) in the Northeast, it’s common for couples to have kids starting around the ge 30 and going into the mid 40’s.

So why should anyone judge?

The biggest problem is there’s a growing disconnect between what evolution says is the biologically ‘correct’ time and what modern society drives given the pressures to get a higher education, become financially independent/secure, and find a suitable long-term mate. I don’t pretend to know how we will just to this disconnect over time... right now we seem to be using medicine to put a band-aid on the problem.

In lower-income areas, amongst lower income and under-educated populations, having kids younger is the norm... and this can perpetuate the lower-class status of offspring when the parents are not capable of properly raising their kids in the modern world. Obviously this doesn’t apply to everyone... but it is a trend.

[NomadPatriot]

Let me know when President Obama or his family start complaining about high marginal tax rates, then this will be hypocrisy. It's ok to have money, it's the complaining (and funding the Republican party to make sure that taxes are illegal) that the tax man takes away your eighth house is the problem.

how is funding the republican party making sure taxes are illegal...?

the Obamacare health insurance "tax" was deemed unconstitutional ( and therefore illegal....)… that is a Democrat enforced tax.. not Republican... Republicans cut that tax..

[spurgistan]

Let me know when President Obama or his family start complaining about high marginal tax rates, then this will be hypocrisy. It's ok to have money, it's the complaining (and funding the Republican party to make sure that taxes are illegal) that the tax man takes away your eighth house is the problem.

how is funding the republican party making sure taxes are illegal...?

the Obamacare health insurance "tax" was deemed unconstitutional ( and therefore illegal....)… that is a Democrat enforced tax.. not Republican... Republicans cut that tax..

Sure, this random tangent sounds good. Let's talk about the individual mandate.

First, the Republican-led Supreme Court ruled the mandate was constitutional when they said the underlying law was while simultaneously somehow deciding that Medicad didn't constitute interstate commerce so they couldn't require states to expand Medicad (the fact that states that chose not to expand Medicaid are worse off is probably not related). Once a RWNJ got the presidency, the Republican Congress voted down a financial penalty for failing to have health insurance. But as you learned in school (?) the Congress does not determine constitutionality. The mandate wasn't unconstitutional, it was just a convenient target for people terrified that a moderate health care reform bill would snowball into literal government takeover (ironically, the lesson the left learned is that trying to work with Republicans is a fools errand, so the next reform effort will be a lot less Republican-friendly)
edit italicized

[NomadPatriot]

Let me know when President Obama or his family start complaining about high marginal tax rates, then this will be hypocrisy. It's ok to have money, it's the complaining (and funding the Republican party to make sure that taxes are illegal) that the tax man takes away your eighth house is the problem.

how is funding the republican party making sure taxes are illegal...?

the Obamacare health insurance "tax" was deemed unconstitutional ( and therefore illegal....)… that is a Democrat enforced tax.. not Republican... Republicans cut that tax..

Sure, this random tangent sounds good. Let's talk about the individual mandate.

First, the Republican-led Supreme Court ruled the mandate was constitutional when they said the underlying law was while simultaneously somehow deciding that Medicad didn't constitute interstate commerce so they couldn't require states to expand Medicad (the fact that states that chose not to expand Medicaid are worse off is probably not related). Once a RWNJ got the presidency, the Republican Congress voted down a financial penalty for failing to have health insurance. But as you learned in school (?) the Congress does not determine constitutionality. The mandate wasn't unconstitutional, it was just a convenient target for people terrified that a moderate health care reform bill would snowball into literal government takeover (ironically, the lesson the left learned is that trying to work with Republicans is a fools errand, so the next reform effort will be a lot less Republican-friendly)
edit italicized

Supreme Court judges do not have a Political Affiliation.

but thanks for the long drawn out .. yes.. it was deemed unconstitutional because the Democrats lied saying it was Free then imposed a tax after it passed.
I never said anything about something being 'voted' on..
I never mentioned the Supreme Court or Congress..

so your rant was pointless

[spurgistan]

So, in your reality how did the penalty for the mandate become "deemed" unconstitutional? Fairies? Ghost of Ronald Reagan? I really want to go back in time (either 3 or 30 years, I honestly can't tell) and have a stern word with your civics teacher.

[NomadPatriot]

So, in your reality how did the penalty for the mandate become "deemed" unconstitutional? Fairies? Ghost of Ronald Reagan? I really want to go back in time (either 3 or 30 years, I honestly can't tell) and have a stern word with your civics teacher.

already answered that.. read my last post..
pay attention..