Conquer Club

How far behind the US really is?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

How far behind the US really is?

Postby GoranZ on Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:21 pm

Investing in the future technologies pays off. China, Japan, Europe and even Russia does it, but US doesn't. Will US pay the price for that negligence?

China has the largest high-speed railway in the world, with 15,500 miles of track and most major cities covered by the network.
I recently took China's fastest "G" train from Beijing to the northwestern city of Xi'an, which cuts an 11-hour journey — roughly the distance between New York and Chicago — to 4.5 hours.
I found the experience delightful, with relatively cheap tickets, painless security, comfortable seats, air-conditioned cabins, and plenty of legroom.
It left me thinking about how far behind US infrastructure has become, when most comparable journeys still require expensive and tiring air travel.

I rode China's superfast bullet train that could go from New York to Chicago in 4.5 hours — and it shows how far behind the US really is
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Serbia on Mon Aug 20, 2018 3:36 pm

TL;DR
Depends on where you are, and which part of the US you’re talking about. NYC is 5 hours behind London, but Honolulu is 11 hours beind. Meanwhile Beijing is a full 12 hours ahead of Detroit, and 15 hours ahead of Seattle.

Now if you’re in South America, you may in some instances actually be behind the US, proving that it is possible for the US to get ahead. In fact, parts of the US are ahead of other parts, which is why Southerners think they’re so much better than Californians. That also has to do with religion and politics (just trying to keep this thread On Topic, given the forum we’re in), but we can save that for another day.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby mookiemcgee on Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:03 pm

Serbia wrote:Southerners think they’re so much better than Californians.


they aren't
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Serbia on Mon Aug 20, 2018 5:39 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:
Serbia wrote:Southerners think they’re so much better than Californians.


they aren't


But they ARE ahead of you. Because Science.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby mookiemcgee on Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:13 pm

Serbia wrote:
mookiemcgee wrote:
Serbia wrote:Southerners think they’re so much better than Californians.


they aren't


But they ARE ahead of you. Because Science.


Maybe, but Iceland is WAY ahead of the South.
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:43 pm

What a useless comparison. Unless the u.s. population somehow skyrockets and rivals China's 25+ megacities (or whatever the number actually is) there's no reason for a hyper fast train to the other side of the country.

Also Serbia is obviously right.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Serbia on Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:19 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:
Serbia wrote:
mookiemcgee wrote:
Serbia wrote:Southerners think they’re so much better than Californians.


they aren't


But they ARE ahead of you. Because Science.


Maybe, but Iceland is WAY ahead of the South.


I should know, I’ve been to both the South and Iceland.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby mookiemcgee on Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:49 pm

I guess that means Serbia is way behind the USA and China?
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Neoteny on Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:42 pm

How far behind the US really is?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Serbia on Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:22 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:I guess that means Serbia is way behind the USA and China?


No. Serbia is behind China by 6 hours, yet ahead of Boston by 6 hours. So Serbia is pretty much awesome because of the poetic 6s.

Are you from the Southern part of California? Might explain your reasoning some.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Sep 01, 2018 8:33 pm

“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28118
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby GoranZ on Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:17 am

Dukasaur wrote:


Judging from the video and the actual numbers if US copies what Canada is doing(especially in healthcare and education) the things will correct it self in 20-30 years.
Button line... Trumps tax reform is crap. Richer become even more rich, middle class will start to fall behind, but the averages will be the same.

I have quite orthodox view on how to determine if a country is doing good or not...
How big is the percentage of population that is middle class? The bigger the better the country is doing.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm


Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby Serbia on Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:44 pm

How far behind the US really is?

- Sacha Baron Cohen
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby GoranZ on Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:05 pm

Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby mookiemcgee on Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:38 pm



I love how the dakotas, Montana and wyoming never see any high speed rail ever according to the video. Karel is gonna have to keep catching the bus!
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby tzor on Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:25 am



It's a wonderful idea ... in theory. But you are going to need far more than 67%.

There is a vast difference between Europe and the US and it's not just distance (let's face it, the entire European Continent is about the size of the east coast of the US and we are talking cross continent here which is vastly longer distances) but about the love of the automobile. Getting there is only half the problem; getting around once you get there is the other half. There are other things involved as well but the bottom line is that it is going to be very difficult to get a passenger rail system to be profitable in the US (in fact it never was). Most of the older railroads were built upon the backs of freight cargo and they died with the decision of the federal government to assist those veterans coming back from the European part of WWII who maintained the truck supply system. Using a vague excuse of national security and the desire for a whole lot of "runways" to land nuclear bomb carrying bombers they created the Eisenhower Interstate System which basically killed commercial freight.

High speed rail would basically form a similar problem to hub and spoke airport designs. With rare exceptions, (Etihad Airways is a good example of a hub and spoke system airline) this has been put aside by the airlines because the annoyances of having to go to the spoke in the first place (along with connecting flights) is more than having a slower and smaller place going directly from point A to point B. Now the rail system isn't a point to point system either so it's not a direct alternative to high speed rail lines, but rail still has to compete with air.

This is all before the necessary cost to implement the tracks. You have to get all new right of ways and whole new track infrastructure since the existing rail system is basically designed for freight because that is where the money is. When you add government it becomes a money pit.

Just one element of this would be CASHR(California High-Speed Rail) ... approved in 2008, started in 2015 and the first segment won't be finished until 2027 with the first phase in 2033.

Using a base flying off the seat of my pants calculation, the proposal would be of an order of timescale as that of building pyramids and medieval cathedral construction.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby 2dimes on Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:34 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:


I love how the dakotas, Montana and wyoming never see any high speed rail ever according to the video. Karel is gonna have to keep catching the bus!


You need people to ride the train, there are less people in those states combined than most of the higher density states.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13088
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby mookiemcgee on Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:54 pm

2dimes wrote:
mookiemcgee wrote:


I love how the dakotas, Montana and wyoming never see any high speed rail ever according to the video. Karel is gonna have to keep catching the bus!


You need people to ride the train, there are less people in those states combined than most of the higher density states.


Oh I completely understand the why, just think it's funny.

Interesting though that no one ever talks about high speed trains for moving product rather than people. In the current system passenger trains make up a small percentage of total trains. I guess it's a weight/cost thing that prevents high speed for freight as even being part of the conversation?
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5710
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby jonesthecurl on Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:17 pm

One of the problems with the system is that the track owners give priority to freight, so the Amtrak passenger trains are often hours late. As a passenger, the other no-no for me is that trains often cost more than planes. I went from Salt lake City to Oakland when I was loooking for somewhere to live in CA some while ago. The train was five hours late at the beginning, and about 12 by the end. The fare (not sleeper fare) was bout the same as an air fare, and if you wanted a sleeper it was stupidly expensive. Train was nice though.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jonesthecurl
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Location: disused action figure warehouse

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby tzor on Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:30 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:Interesting though that no one ever talks about high speed trains for moving product rather than people. In the current system passenger trains make up a small percentage of total trains. I guess it's a weight/cost thing that prevents high speed for freight as even being part of the conversation?


I wouldn't say that. Gordon Danby (who really invented the original Mag Lev system that eventually wound up in Japan) Son's next generation Mag Lev system is first and foremost designed for high speed freight transport.

Original proposal in 2009
2011 article
This year as a part of the 555 Epcal purchase.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby GoranZ on Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:56 pm

@tzor But China has 25.000 km of high-speed railway lines. EU has 10.000 km less then China. And Chinese are building more then what EU currently has atm.
If Chinese can do it, US should also be able to do the same... Not to mention US size is comparable to the Chinese.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: How far behind the US really is?

Postby tzor on Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:54 am

China is a strange nation at times and it's probably illogical to compare other nations to it because of that. There are whole cities that have been built that are unoccupied. The reason is simple ... construction projects give prestige to local officials. I'm going to guess that these lines are never going to make a profit. There was an article on the Financial Times, but it's behind a paywall. Here is one from ECNS China high speed rail: lucrative in east, loss-making in center and west: "The report said many high-speed rail lines connecting major cities in the central and western regions continue to lose money, and some are far from breaking even."

So in short if you solve the right of way issues, there is a good argument for a EU style design, which is the East Coast corridor. A West Coast corridor is less feasible but possible. Intercontinental systems are not going to get the necessary investment.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: idefix2