by chewyman on Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:03 am
Anarchist wrote:Tazeyo wrote:chewyman wrote:Tazeyo wrote:Nation Y wouldn't need to illegalize cannabis for Nation X, except in the case that Nation X wants it to happen and if Nation Y has no other choice, but to accept that to have the trade relation.
Err, Y wasn't a nation, it specifically referred to the one Rastafarian person. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
I was anwering to the other person, who was talking about Nation Y.
I took that as the place where the rastafarian comes from.
What he said ^
im in no means trying to lump you into the illogical category, your arguements are very good, and while I agree with most of your opinions, I dissagree on the solutions(Good post under incest, will respond after sleep to prevent insane rants on my part)
Oh, OK then. Well then what Tazeyo said would be my response to your question.
Thank you. I'm looking forward to reading your response, however I can't help feel that perhaps another thread is needed. Of course then the downside being that I'm swamped with people who just read the thread title and decide that I'm a religious bigot without reading my reasoning. But then again, it looks like the incest debate is pretty much over, so there probably isn't any harm in hijacking the thread for a more private debate on homosexuality. We already know the mods won't see it anyway.
If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?
