waauw wrote:mrswdk wrote:I didn't twist anything. The UK has arrested and punished people for making crass jokes on Twitter. Macron has denied RT and Sputnik any access to him. France enacts policies that directly target and marginalize its Muslim and Roma communities. Spain is arresting and locking up journalists who show any sympathy towards Basque independence (and refuses to allow the Basque to have a referendum on independence). All things that would make you whine and criticize if the Chinese government did them, but which you are perfectly happy to defend when European governments do them.
Denying access is not the same as censorship.
If denying access had no impact upon RT or Sputnik, then why would Macron do it? The reason he has denied them access to him is to limit the amount of information they are able to access and report on. The ultimate aim of doing so is limit their ability to operate effectively as news organizations. He wants to squeeze them out of the public debate. It's less direct than outright blocking their websites but his reasons for doing so are the same.
That's not the same thing at all. Whatever is happening in France it's not with the purpose of marginalizing muslims. It's about protecting local philosophies and customs, and protection from terrorism.
It's refusing to let Muslim women wear the clothing of their choice. Telling Muslim women (many of whom were probably born and raised in France) that their beliefs and way of dressing deserve to be outlawed and met with punishment tells them that their beliefs are secondary to the beliefs of other French people. That marginalizes them.
In Tibet, the Han Chinese are the immigrants trespassing the will of the locals.
Tibet is a part of the Chinese nation (and has been for centuries). If your view is that Muslims should not be allowed to maintain their own culture or behaviors in France, you should support the Chinese government's approach of not allowing Tibetan culture to flourish too prominently in China.
The Basque ETA, has the same history as the IRA: terrorism. Of course they will crack down on everybody propagizing affiliated to or supporting terrorists.
None of the journalists in the stories I linked were supporting terrorism.
==> China goes a lot further than this:
Human Rights Watch alleges that in the days following the riots, the Chinese police conducted large-scale sweeps of Uighur neighborhoods in Urumqi, unlawfully arresting young men. This was followed by the disappearances of many of the detainees. According to the report, the enforced disappearances place the detainees outside the scope of the protections of the law, while failing to disclose the detainees' whereabouts and declining to acknowledge their rights and liberties. The HRW report indicates that the victims of the disappearances were mostly young Uighur men in their 20s, the youngest being 14 years old. While HRW has documented 43 disappearances, the advocacy group suggests that the number of disappeared persons is likely much higher.
The French response to its recent terror attacks has been to put a state of emergency in force, suspend due process and start raiding the homes of random Muslims. The Al-Jazeera story on Spain says that journalists sympathetic to Basque independence have been arrested, tortured and then chucked in jail. The UK government (and others) has been complicit and/or directly supported the detention of British citizens in Guantanamo Bay on terror charges that were later dropped. In Xinjiang the Chinese police are dealing with people who have driven into a market and thrown grenades at shoppers, stabbed 30-40 people to death in Kunming Station, driven a car into pedestrians outside the Forbidden City etc. Their response in the face of these sorts of violent terror attacks on civilians doesn't seem out of keeping with the approaches taken by any of those European governments I just mentioned.