Most of you are Cupid

by **Dukasaur** on Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:15 am

Discuss.

by **2dimes** on Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:51 am

i can agree with that

by **Dukasaur** on Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:25 pm

Click image to enlarge.

by **Thorthoth** on Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:17 pm

Most of us are the Roman god of love... metaphorically, literally, collectively? sequentially? multiple identical gods?, one indivisible multi-partite god?, all within a single entity or each as a separate manifestation or avatar*?

*In the original meaning of the term.

by **mrswdk** on Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:33 pm

OP is a candy ass.

OP is always a candy ass.

by **Dukasaur** on Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:47 pm

Thorthoth wrote:Most of us are the Roman god of love... metaphorically, literally, collectively? sequentially? multiple identical gods?, one indivisible multi-partite god?, all within a single entity or each as a separate manifestation or avatar*?

*In the original meaning of the term.

This is one of the weaknesses of necrobumping.... you lose context.

Anyway, look at the picture, then consider possible context.

by **Thorthoth** on Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:50 pm

Dukasaur wrote:
Thorthoth wrote:Most of us are the Roman god of love... metaphorically, literally, collectively? sequentially? multiple identical gods?, one indivisible multi-partite god?, all within a single entity or each as a separate manifestation or avatar*?

*In the original meaning of the term.

This is one of the weaknesses of necrobumping.... you lose context.

Anyway, look at the picture, then consider possible context.

Not 'lost' but 're'. Recontextualization is one of the key trends of post-modern art.

And there is nothing 'necro' about 'bumping'. If you need a prefix, try 'vivo'.

by **Dukasaur** on Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:01 pm

Thorthoth wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Thorthoth wrote:Most of us are the Roman god of love... metaphorically, literally, collectively? sequentially? multiple identical gods?, one indivisible multi-partite god?, all within a single entity or each as a separate manifestation or avatar*?

*In the original meaning of the term.

This is one of the weaknesses of necrobumping.... you lose context.

Anyway, look at the picture, then consider possible context.

Not 'lost' but 're'. Recontextualization is one of the key trends of post-modern art.

And there is nothing 'necro' about 'bumping'. If you need a prefix, try 'vivo'.

If I needed a prefix, I'd be sure to ask for one.

Little-known fact: even though I've been speaking English since I was five, I'm still technically an immigrant. So when I started university I had to write an exam in English proficiency. Finished in the 2nd highest percentile. So, something like 20th in a field of 1500.