Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I've said it before, but the last season (that's right, season, you turd) reinforced how much i hate the Daenerys character. She's fucking bulletproof. She should be dead. She fucks up her occupation of Mereen, flees on her one free dragon, gets captured by the khals, then oh yeah, she's immune to fire so she can kill the khals and get their horde. f*ck off, she doesn't deserve shit. Anybody else would've been killed ages ago.
I hope she lands in the seven kingdoms and gets her head chopped off.
-TG
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:True although remember Gandalf is an angel like being who directly serves God. He's of the same kind of being as Sauron and Morgoth. He isn't human.
-TG
KoolBak wrote:Just curious...did you read all the books first? Before they made this a TV show.....
I did....watched a couple of the episodes and it just felt....wrong. Couldn't enjoy the show as I kept finding it...off....from the books. I hate that...ruins the show for me. Solution....quit fucking reading?![]()
I know this series is hugely popular....the damn artist was just such a sadist, killing off all the people you grow to like...lol
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I've said it before, but the last season (that's right, season, you turd)...
Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
Symmetry wrote:Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
You don't read much, do you?
Thorthoth wrote:Symmetry wrote:Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
You don't read much, do you?
No, I read plenty.
Was your stupid question supposed to be a segue for you to pathetically 'brag' that you've read the 'Game of Thrones' books too.
Symmetry wrote:Thorthoth wrote:Symmetry wrote:Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
You don't read much, do you?
No, I read plenty.
Was your stupid question supposed to be a segue for you to pathetically 'brag' that you've read the 'Game of Thrones' books too.
You don't read much, do you?
Symmetry wrote:Can you give us the names of a few books you read recently?
Thorthoth wrote:Symmetry wrote:Can you give us the names of a few books you read recently?
No, no I can't.,, Damn, you go me Symmetry. You called my bluff and I'm forced to admit that I don't even know the titles of any books. Brilliantly played as always.
You didn't become CC's #1 troll-parasite for nothing, did you?
Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
Thorthoth wrote:The only worthwhile innovation of Game of Thrones is that it keeps killing off it's main characters. Maintaining consistent protagonists is a passé concept that stems from emotional insecurity.
Other than that, GoT is just soft porn LotR.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Not really. LotR is a classic, but suffers in its moral simplicity. Sure, it's a great story, following Frodo through his trek into despair, but it's black and white. You always know that the good guys will ultimately prevail.
Dukasaur wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Not really. LotR is a classic, but suffers in its moral simplicity. Sure, it's a great story, following Frodo through his trek into despair, but it's black and white. You always know that the good guys will ultimately prevail.
Actually, that's far from the truth. Yes, the Dark Lord is defeated and the Ring is destroyed, but people don't just go to being happy and whole. Frodo never overcomes his melancholy and sails off to the Undying Lands. The elves are nothing but sadness; everything about them is a slow fading and waning. The dwarves are less numberous, the Ents are headed towards extinction. Man is the only species that is rising, but he is a more banal and less majestic version of his Numenorean ancestor. One day, it is said, even Tom Bombadil will sing no more.
It's far from black and white. It is as complex as life itself; a sad and wistful look at how bright and promising things were in the morning of your youth, followed by one realization after another that tomorrow will never be as bold as yesterday.
Dukasaur wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Not really. LotR is a classic, but suffers in its moral simplicity. Sure, it's a great story, following Frodo through his trek into despair, but it's black and white. You always know that the good guys will ultimately prevail.
Actually, that's far from the truth. Yes, the Dark Lord is defeated and the Ring is destroyed, but people don't just go to being happy and whole. Frodo never overcomes his melancholy and sails off to the Undying Lands. The elves are nothing but sadness; everything about them is a slow fading and waning. The dwarves are less numberous, the Ents are headed towards extinction. Man is the only species that is rising, but he is a more banal and less majestic version of his Numenorean ancestor. One day, it is said, even Tom Bombadil will sing no more.
It's far from black and white. It is as complex as life itself; a sad and wistful look at how bright and promising things were in the morning of your youth, followed by one realization after another that tomorrow will never be as bold as yesterday.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee