Conquer Club

No Theme Mafia - town + nag win!

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Skittles! on Fri May 26, 2017 3:29 am

Vote Count

Pika (2) - samlen, lovo

7 alive, 4 to lynch.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby lord voldemort on Fri May 26, 2017 5:40 am

It's the timing. Instead of coming out and saying who he blocked he asked who was blocked. I respond. And then he says yeah I blocked lovo.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Pikanchion on Fri May 26, 2017 5:41 am

So you're willing to believe that you were blocked by somebody other than me who isn't counterclaiming?
User avatar
Private Pikanchion
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:10 pm

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Fri May 26, 2017 6:36 am

lord voldemort wrote:It's the timing. Instead of coming out and saying who he blocked he asked who was blocked. I respond. And then he says yeah I blocked lovo.

So are you saying that he's not a roleblocker, then?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby nagerous on Fri May 26, 2017 7:12 am

Lovo my name is Bussy Server (chef)

The other diner knows who they are I am waiting for them to post!!

I see what you are saying lovo but frenchie chan was blocked night one and pika is the only one claiming to have done so. I blocked chu but it didn't work I seems
Image
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby lord voldemort on Fri May 26, 2017 9:00 am

I'm super concerned that the 2 you bussyd are scum partners. And that pika is an actual hooker. Explain his actions and why he'd block a town power role. And his unwillingness to provide his name. And the role of his dining partner
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Fri May 26, 2017 9:15 am

Who's the town power role?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Skoffin on Fri May 26, 2017 9:46 am

I think LoVo is suggesting that Pika should know that LoVo is a town power role and thus only scum would target LoVo.

Based on what has been said and roles I am concluding that the 'dining partner' cannot be nag, Lovo, pika, myself or ragian. Leaving it to be Sam or chu. I'd assume chu because he hasn't posted, but why pick him again? If it's Sam then he knows pika's role and that makes his line of questioning more interesting. If it's not one of those two somehow then it must be ragian. HERTRST
Pika knows their role, while nag who knows their identity so it will be very quick to sort this out based on those two anyway.

LoVo, I don't understand why you find pika's admissions suspicious. He has already proved he can block and no one else has claimed to have picked you. He could be scum but he's not lying about the block.
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Sun May 28, 2017 4:00 am

I wasn't at any dinner party. Honestly, I feel like all the fun is going on without me :(

This game has stalled, and I'm losing track of things. Right now I find LoVo most suspicious: I didn't like his play that much D2, and he is too concerned with appearing townie (or wanting everyone to think that he must be townie, if you prefer). Also, he's the only one who has killed someone.

Vote LoVo
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby lord voldemort on Sun May 28, 2017 7:26 am

If you're confused raigan then go back and re read and make some notes. I explained why I killed sh. I literally had no choice.
I'm not too concerned about appearing town. I claimed my full role already. You either buy it or you don't.

Need to hear from nag about his bussy (it's been long enough)
Want to hear from chu
And I want to hear a claim from pika (unless nag gives us something else to go on)

I feel like I'm the only one trying to put all this together :(
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Fircoal on Sun May 28, 2017 9:26 am

nagerous wrote:I roleblocked pika with my bussy. He claims to have roleblocked lovo and succeeded. Lovo also claims to have been blocked and there was no NK.

Fircoal did you learn anything?


I did not learn anything.

Skoffin wrote:
Based on what has been said and roles I am concluding that the 'dining partner' cannot be nag, Lovo, pika, myself or ragian. Leaving it to be Sam or chu. I'd assume chu because he hasn't posted, but why pick him again?


Yup It's me.

Pika is a Roleblocker. Skittles did not tell me any more than that.

SO the question is more along the lines of what side is Pika on? He's not lying about what he is but he could be a bad guy. I'm not sure if he is though.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
User avatar
Captain Fircoal
 
Posts: 19422
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Location: Abusing Silleh Buizels

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Sun May 28, 2017 2:00 pm

Fine. We're getting nowhere. Let's mass claim. Yes?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Samlen on Mon May 29, 2017 1:36 am

Now that we know pika's role is just 'roleblocker' and not hooker, it might be safe for me to claim. Then again, not completely sure. I'm fine with mass claim, especially since we're stalling big time and now that I know pika is not specifically a hooker, i'm fine with finishing my claim. My second part is virgin. If I die, I can prevent a lynch, next night's kills, or let my enabled role perform two actions. I also was told that there was a hooker out there to get me to make me loose my powers. I wasn't certain if there were multiple hookers (considering our townname/theme) and only one was after me or if ga was the only one. Also, since one of my abilities can let voldemort use his action twice, i'm fairly certain he's town, like me.

Meant to bring this up earlier but ga was hooker/usurper/cult leader. Does this mean they were to usurp a cult leader instead? Or that they were a town-sided cult? Or a cult leader that could usurp the mafia godfather as claimed? I'm not quite certain which is the case, but the dead list has ga listed as town/cult. Do we actually have a mafia or just ga's cult, or was ga's cult limited to trying to recruit me, the virgin? There was a death n1 so probably is a mafia and I think a full powered cult woulda been too much to add into this game as well, so I think ga's cult was supposed to start with me or that the 'gf' that ga could usurp was really a cult leader.

Quick thoughts on players:
Town
Samlen - Push-Push-Push it - enabling virgin - connected to voldemort - obviously town
lordvoldemort - monopoly guy - dreaming god - enabled by samlen - would be very cruel if he wasn't town
nagerous - bussy server - chef - seems pretty town from actions

Not Clear
Skoffin - (no concrete claim) - Fake-claimed doc. Bit all over the place yesterday for seemingly no reason. Would very much like a roleclaim, though fakeclaim doctor does seem more like a bold townie move.
Ragian - no claim - Actions could be of any alignment imo. Would also like roleclaim.


Scummier charecters
Pika - (name?) - Roleblocker - claims to have blocked fircoal n1 and voldemort n2 (first didn't work according to fircoal but second one did according to Voldemort, though he claimed his target after voldemort revealed)
Fircoal -(name?) - (Investigative role?) - cleared dj before he died BUT was blocked by pika night 1 (night that they claimed let them see dj as cleared). Considering Pika has been pretty much confirmed roleblocker by now (good or bad). Actually maybe they were lying and trying to appear town by 'clearing' dj. Then again, pika says fircoal's not a killing role. Honestly not sure. Maybe both fircoal and pika are scum buddies? Purposefully contradicting each other to make one seem town when other is killed.
User avatar
Lieutenant Samlen
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:39 pm
Location: Good ol' rainy seattle

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Mon May 29, 2017 7:27 am

unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Skoffin on Mon May 29, 2017 8:08 am

I'll give you guys a tiny hint at what type of role I might be. Because I'm so cool, but also cause I got bored and my plans are probably foiled anyway.
I claimed doc to hopefully get counterclaimed, but I didn't. Booo. Shame I can't vote myself
I'm happy to plod along to see how right I am about things
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Mon May 29, 2017 8:55 am

You claimed doc because you are doc and you wanted to out someone lying, or you randomly claimed doc because you wanted to out any real doc?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby lord voldemort on Mon May 29, 2017 9:47 am

unvote, vote skoffin
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Mon May 29, 2017 9:48 am

Care to add some words to that vote?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby lord voldemort on Mon May 29, 2017 9:49 am

i think trying to get a doc claim out of town early day 1/2 is a pretty big scum tell as any
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Mon May 29, 2017 9:54 am

I agree, but what if she's the actual doc and just phrased it poorly?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Pikanchion on Mon May 29, 2017 2:54 pm

Well one of my two top suspects is trying to start a train on the other one it appears, the fact that Skoffin has definitely been lying one way or the other and claimed to know exactly why nobody was killed last night is also highly suspicious in that context. I'm willing to trust Samlen on lord voldemort for now, as their roleclaim certainly explains their prior wariness around my role, so...

Vote: Skoffin

Did you actually have any reason to believe scum would counterclaim you from your role description Skoffin? -If not I don't at all buy that you were lying for that reason.
User avatar
Private Pikanchion
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:10 pm

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Samlen on Mon May 29, 2017 8:41 pm

Ragian wrote:unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?

I already had a vote on pika before the post, didn't think i needed to change it yet since I'm quite certain either pika or fircoal is scum and maybe both. I've been getting more and more jester vibes actually from skoffin, though my other theory is they had something in place already to protect themselves last night, not the doc (if we even have one).

Does anyone else have any thoughts on what the dealio is with ga's role? Could the other three of you guys actually claim? You started the massclaim idea, ragian, why not claim as well?
User avatar
Lieutenant Samlen
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:39 pm
Location: Good ol' rainy seattle

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Skoffin on Mon May 29, 2017 9:41 pm

II'm having a hard time resisting slapping you muppets with a fish and pointing out what I obviously meant. It's really hurting my inner pedant.
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Ragian on Tue May 30, 2017 4:13 am

Samlen wrote:
Ragian wrote:unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?

I already had a vote on pika before the post, didn't think i needed to change it yet since I'm quite certain either pika or fircoal is scum and maybe both. I've been getting more and more jester vibes actually from skoffin, though my other theory is they had something in place already to protect themselves last night, not the doc (if we even have one).

Does anyone else have any thoughts on what the dealio is with ga's role? Could the other three of you guys actually claim? You started the massclaim idea, ragian, why not claim as well?

Oh, you already voted. It's good that I'm not skimming...

And yes, I started the mass claim idea, but I would reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally like for skoffin to start. And then I want Pika to give us his name claim.

I've lost track. What's the vote count?
Image
User avatar
Major Ragian
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:39 am

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Postby Skoffin on Tue May 30, 2017 4:37 am

My name is Mitch
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron