Anarchist wrote:Jenos Ridan wrote:Anarchist wrote:sorry Jenos,
intent just isnt a good enough reason to put them in seperate categories
Hitlers intent after all was to bring Deutchland to its rightfull place on top of the world, does his intent make him better then a Mafia?
Sorry for using the extreme example
Its all excuses, If we get rid of one we get rid of the other.
your arguement about money being bad just prooves the point against property
The arguement about illegal drugs promoting illegal drugs just supports the arguement for legalising them, Its a dark day when prescription drugs kill as many people as the illegal ones
True, intent is never enough. Hence the need for action based on stated intent.
Anarchy will not last. If their were not government, there would be nothing to stop a crazy, sick freak from murdering you (likely, in your sleep cause that is how he gets his rock off). And ownership of property is not evil by intent, it is evil by misuse.
The nuclear bomb isnt bad, its evil by missuse.
Not a great incentive to have one since it will most likely be missused.
Anarchy may not last, but atleast more of us will follow older codes then these highly dissagreeable newer ones.
To be honest im more afraid of the morality police then a sociapath.
Nuclear bombs are weapons, but unlike most other weapons, they are never used. It is a deterint factor. Ever hear of M.A.D.? Your analogy is thus flawed.
Explain what you mean by the newer codes. And for that matter, the older codes too, so as we're both on the same page.
