Statistical Question

by **iAmCaffeine** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:04 am

So, I have two regions that can attack an n2 for a card. One region has 198 troops, the other 299. What are the actual, precise, statistical odds for both of these assaults? Serious question. Thx in advance.

by **mrswdk** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:07 am

(198/2)*((3*2)*6) = 3564

by **ConfederateSS** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:06 am

------Either way...YELL ONE LAST CHARGE!...after the attack... The neutral will file a lame C and A report...Like the cry baby the neutral is...Because ,the neutral will be paranoid in thinking the world is out to get'em...When in reality ,it wasn't at all...Just a last charge...Until the neutral makes it so ,over a post of a make believe prize... :lol:

ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)... :lol:

...Lucky E2 knows the realio...dealio...

by **IcePack** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:16 pm

http://gamesbyemail.com/games/gambit/battleodds

by **iAmCaffeine** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:22 pm

I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

by **IcePack** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:33 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

by **iAmCaffeine** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:40 pm

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.

by **IcePack** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:51 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.

I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

by **iAmCaffeine** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:55 pm

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.

I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

Are you trolling me?

by **IcePack** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:59 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.

I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

Are you trolling me?

No? You asked a question and I provided an way to get your answer. You complaining about the link shows me you either aren't that serious about finding it out, or idk?
Like they say, you can lead a horse to water but can't make them drink.

It's a common site people use to get risk battle odds. If you want a different link then Google is your friend

by **Dukasaur** on Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:03 pm

In B4 Sym "See this is why we need a whole new forum to debate stats 24/7"

by **iAmCaffeine** on Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:57 am

Dukasaur wrote:In B4 Sym "See this is why we need a whole new forum to debate stats 24/7"

Please stay on topic in my serious thread.

IcePack wrote:No? You asked a question and I provided an way to get your answer. You complaining about the link shows me you either aren't that serious about finding it out, or idk?
Like they say, you can lead a horse to water but can't make them drink.

It's a common site people use to get risk battle odds. If you want a different link then Google is your friend

People like who? Are they reputable? I asked for an answer, not a method to find my answer, so you weren't very helpful.