Symmetry wrote:Indeed, I've never really understood the fundamentalist mindset that somehow thinks that banning abortion somehow stops women from having abortions. You'd think that Trump could at least have had a woman in the room for the photo-op, but it really does come across as being about men controlling women's bodies.
It's not about men controlling women's bodies, you silly lad, and that's not the mindset. That's just a straw man, as you're so fond of saying, trotted out by the opposition. It's disingenuous. If it were true, there wouldn't be any pro-life women out there, and there are plenty. It's about criminalizing abortion (what the lifers see as murder), and later leading to the capabilities to punish those who receive or provide abortions. Everyone knows abortions will always happen, just like any other crime will always happen until the end of time.
Saying the goal of anti-abortion measures is simply for some crusty old men who have control fantasies is akin to saying the same thing for anti-murder or anti-theft measures. It's no different from the so-called drug war from Reagan's fallout. Drugs will always be a problem, and now they have the justification for imprisonment (and profit!).
Mis-characterizing the pro-lifers like that won't stop them. The only way to ensure that abortion stays legal is to address the heart of the issue, that is, when life begins. It would be much more effective for education to address this issue, displacing religious artifacts about the idea, and emphasizing medical science regarding gestation, embryology, and such.
-TG