Well a lot happened since I was here last. And apparently a lot more drama. Just a suggestion but we can all tone it down a bit. We're all trying to find Team Rocket here. We have a common goal. Sure we may to find those members and lynch them but that doesn't mean they're any less loved irl.
Anyway I find the whole Met's wagon a bit weird imo. It feels like Mets is getting annoyed in a way that seems suicidal if scum. If you were scum woudl you really want be on the record yelling, "STOP MAKING IT EASIER FOR TOWN!" Exactly. I think he is genuinely upset with how the game is being handled. I don't think that's necessarily a scum thing. Some people really value fair play. I don't know too much about Mets so I can't make this call from any authority but I do feel like people are being a bit jumpy when they throw their votes onto him. AD, aage, Serbia - what makes you so sure that mets is scum?
BuJaber wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:
Indeed as I have said to Legionairre, there is limited incentive for me to scumhunt strongly. So dont sit about waiting for me to do so.
If you guys stop asking me for information, I will stop with the sarcastic posting. Its very simple.
So the case on wing is partly based on this quote?
TELL ME PLEASE HOW THAT MEANS HE HAS NO INTEREST IN SCUMHUNTING???? How about YOU read it again. He just doesn't want people to rely on him for it, and look towards him like he has some sort of crystal ball. If you think I'm wrong then please attach a phone number of an english teacher with your post so that I can improve my comprehension.
and I'm the one getting accused of skimming.

Ummm I think you need to reread that post. Because he states that he has limited incentive for him to scumhunt strongly. He doesn't say that he doesn't want people to rely on him. Those are words that you feed into him. Stop trying to protect him from something that's not there.
The Weird One wrote:Fircoal wrote:As for TWO, I'm not sure if he's clueless scum or if he just missed the important peice. While I certainly FOS him, my vote is still on Serbia for now. I would like to see him respond though.
You seem to be rolling with the "either you're third party survivor or you're scum" rather smoothly...And as with any game I've been in, whatever my alignment is makes no difference to my being clueless. You should know this, by now.
Yes which is why I FOS'd you instead of voting you. I am well aware that you can be clueless regardless of role. That was my point. Maybe I didn't state it the best way but I did account for it.
Minister Masket wrote:So my question now is if Wing's list and this reasoning is accurate, why has he only named 5 or 6 players? Where are the other dozen?
Role power limitation, or something more suspicious? Hmm.
Because he doesn't know the other dozen? Look I don't agree with the absolutes Wing is doing but it is BS to try to case suspicion on him for that. How is he supposed to know who all the wild Pokemon are? It seems like you're trying to make a case to divert attention from yourself which is scummy.
dakky21 wrote:Skittles! wrote:So you're not a wild Pokemon, just a Pokemon.
No, my role is Wild Pokemon, but 2 days later I got another role that I was claimed and that I can't no more attack or defend - that will my trainer decide. That's why I believe mitch is Mets pokemon and that's why I unvoted him. More pairs to be found though...
Something smells fishy. Day 1 capture? That's certainly something new. I also find it interesting that dakky would be targeted.