pancakemix wrote:Vote count?
not much happened but alright....
VOTE COUNT
1-pancakemix(Fircoal)
4-Sunstripe(Serbia,nagerous,haoala,dominationnation)
WITH 17 ALIVE IT TAKES 9 TO LYNCH!!!
DAY WILL END WEDNESDAY AT 7:00 PM CENTRAL TIME!!!
Moderator: Community Team
pancakemix wrote:Vote count?
jnd94 wrote:pancakemix wrote:Vote count?
not much happened but alright....
VOTE COUNT
1-pancakemix(Fircoal)
4-Sunstripe(Serbia,nagerous,haoala,dominationnation)
WITH 17 ALIVE IT TAKES 9 TO LYNCH!!!
DAY WILL END WEDNESDAY AT 7:00 AM CENTRAL TIME!!!
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:jnd94 wrote:pancakemix wrote:Vote count?
not much happened but alright....
VOTE COUNT
1-pancakemix(Fircoal)
4-Sunstripe(Serbia,nagerous,haoala,dominationnation)
WITH 17 ALIVE IT TAKES 9 TO LYNCH!!!
DAY WILL END WEDNESDAY AT 7:00 AM CENTRAL TIME!!!
Yeah, but it was back 4 pages. Anywho, I've already stated how I feel about sunstripe, he's suspicious, as is his claim, but it holds enough water to warrant an investigation.
spurgistan wrote:So maybe Sunstripe's story checks out - is there anybody else we can get a lynch on in 13 hours?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
gimpyThewonder wrote:ok looking back over the last 20 pages here are those that i think look scummy:
skittles - ok so geo random votes him in the begining. then unvotes him. This would be a great way for mafia to distance themselves. an early vote/unvote give plausible deniability. But then he later goes out of his way to say look, look, i'm not scummy Serbia said so.
serbia - for various early posts. Then you have the name clearing job done for skittles. and after i said skittles post was odd, serbia basically gave him a mafia tutorial right in front of us, telling him to shush.
domination - some of his post in the mid/early-teens (pages) just seemed off to me
spin - being awefully quiet for an experienced townie.
myself - i read some of my earlier posts and thought wow, that could be taken the wrong way and look bad![]()
but whatever we do we need to get a lynch put together tonight. i know i for one won't be up for the 7am deadline so
vote skittles
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
FOS SerbiaSerbia wrote:gimpyThewonder wrote:ok looking back over the last 20 pages here are those that i think look scummy:
skittles - ok so geo random votes him in the begining. then unvotes him. This would be a great way for mafia to distance themselves. an early vote/unvote give plausible deniability. But then he later goes out of his way to say look, look, i'm not scummy Serbia said so.
serbia - for various early posts. Then you have the name clearing job done for skittles. and after i said skittles post was odd, serbia basically gave him a mafia tutorial right in front of us, telling him to shush.
domination - some of his post in the mid/early-teens (pages) just seemed off to me
spin - being awefully quiet for an experienced townie.
myself - i read some of my earlier posts and thought wow, that could be taken the wrong way and look bad![]()
but whatever we do we need to get a lynch put together tonight. i know i for one won't be up for the 7am deadline so
vote skittles
Funny that I give a mafia tutorial, being as I'm still a newb. (only 1 finished game)
This whole post is almost enough... forget it.
Unvote
VOTE: Gimpy You've convinced me you're scummy.
dominationnation wrote:FOS Serbia
voting someone because they are giving some incitful help?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
dominationnation wrote:he means by a cop
Serbia wrote:dominationnation wrote:FOS Serbia
voting someone because they are giving some incitful help?
No, because he seems suspicious of people who don't seem too suspicious to me (except Skittles, that whole "I'm innocent" post he made for no reason raises some eyebrows). But like Neutrino's vote on Skittles, this is more a FOS than a vote, he's not in any danger of a lynch yet, but I do want to hear more from him.
dominationnation wrote:Can our cop please check out sunstripe tonight and tell us the results. I dont think that we should lynch him today. Serbia on the other hand...UNVOTE VOTE SERBIA why are you so defensive. esspecially of gimpy. what do you have to hide?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Sunstripe wrote:dominationnation wrote:he means by a cop
Ok thanks
Also I have looked over the last few pages and I have to say I think that the plausible suspects are
1) Skittles- Like gimpy the wonder said he goes out of his way to prove his innocence when he doesn't need to
2) Serbia- He seems pretty quick to vote (Fircoal, Me, Gimpy the wonder)
I think they might both be mafia because they sort of helped each other, and I don't think they have ever voted each other, but may have protected each other once or twice.
Serbia wrote:VOTE: Skittles!
Though tasty, they come in a variety of colors... and sometimes the flavor of the color changes, depending on the promotion! Obviously scum!
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:I don't believe serbia to be guilty as he has shown himself to be very obsessed with finding facts for evidence. The way he looked up and found all my posts is enough evidence to me. I agree that Spin is being VERY quiet right now for an experienced player. As such Vote Spin even though I doubt we get a lynch in being that we have 9 hours to get 9 votes on the same person.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:-Cringes- How wrong was it to post my thoughts. way bad.
Anyway, this seems pretty bad. There's not really any leads, to me. How strange is it to have the spotlight on Pancake and Fircoal, then Sunstripe, and now me and Serbia. I'm not that sure, but I think one of us is scummy. All that information out there, against Sunstripe, seemed to be washed away.
Neutrino... Kinda weird right, to just pop in, you reading the last 5 pages, when there is more than that, and just vote me? Also after Gimpy voted for me.
Is thinking allowed really that scummy? Isn't that you're meant to do, post your thoughts? I was not actually defending myself, not at all. It may of came off like that, but seriously, I was not meant to be defending myself.
Gimpy and Neutrino.. Pretty closely tied I think.
FOS: Gimpy and Neutrino.
Serbia wrote:Sunstripe wrote:dominationnation wrote:he means by a cop
Ok thanks
Also I have looked over the last few pages and I have to say I think that the plausible suspects are
1) Skittles- Like gimpy the wonder said he goes out of his way to prove his innocence when he doesn't need to
2) Serbia- He seems pretty quick to vote (Fircoal, Me, Gimpy the wonder)
I think they might both be mafia because they sort of helped each other, and I don't think they have ever voted each other, but may have protected each other once or twice.Serbia wrote:VOTE: Skittles!
Though tasty, they come in a variety of colors... and sometimes the flavor of the color changes, depending on the promotion! Obviously scum!
QFT
So I did vote for Skittles once. I didn't keep my vote on him though, obviously. I'm trying to find scum just like everyone else. I vote, and see what happens. See who reacts. What sticks. What rolls. Who does what. I find it interesting that no one else ever started reacting negatively towards me (including Sunstripe) until my vote on Gimpy. Gimpy is reacting because of the vote. Strongly? Maybe. Dom doesn't like my style or something, so he jumped on the bandwagon. It's fine. I don't have anything real strong to go on with you Gimpy, but something caught my attention. I voted you, you responded, fine. I really don't know who's scum right now, but the one I keep going back to is Sunstripe. I don't have anything strong on him either, just some inconsistencies.
Looking back, another name came up again, which I've been mentioning all day (look back if you want), and it's Spurgistan. He's not posting much, but he is around. Submarining? We're getting to deadline time, so I'm *possibly* making my final vote.
Unvote
VOTE: Spurgistan
Skittles! wrote:-Cringes- How wrong was it to post my thoughts. way bad.
Anyway, this seems pretty bad. There's not really any leads, to me. How strange is it to have the spotlight on Pancake and Fircoal, then Sunstripe, and now me and Serbia. I'm not that sure, but I think one of us is scummy. All that information out there, against Sunstripe, seemed to be washed away.
Neutrino... Kinda weird right, to just pop in, you reading the last 5 pages, when there is more than that, and just vote me? Also after Gimpy voted for me.
Is thinking allowed really that scummy? Isn't that you're meant to do, post your thoughts? I was not actually defending myself, not at all. It may of came off like that, but seriously, I was not meant to be defending myself.
Gimpy and Neutrino.. Pretty closely tied I think.
FOS: Gimpy and Neutrino.
Neutrino wrote:From reading the last 5 pages, I agree that Sunstripe needs an investigation, but that the evidence against him isnt enough to warrant a lynch now.
At the moment, I believe Skittles to be the most scummy one around. That entire 'thinking aloud' bit was fairly suspiscious
Vote: Skittles
Actually more in the way of a FOS, but since we need so many for a kill there is no danger of him being killed without some kind of explanation on his part.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Serbia thank you for pointing out the facts concerning my votes. The mod currently has a pm waiting for him asking to please correct the final vote tally to show that I did in fact vote for geo. I gave him time to defend himself since he is a noob, but when he refused to give any good reason on why I shouldn't vote for him I went ahead and voted it. When there is plenty of time left before a lynch is due, I try to allow someone a chance to defend themself which is what happened there. Sometimes they convince me that they don't need to be lynched while other times it confirms that they need the noose around their neck.
Skittles you shouldn't skim. Evidently you did that over the part where Serbia proves that I did in fact vote for Geo as I found his role claim to be not very helpful.
Being that it wasn't nighttime I also am a little suspicious of Duday saying that he "knew", but right now I'm not goign to worry too much about that.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Neutrino wrote:Skittles! wrote:-Cringes- How wrong was it to post my thoughts. way bad.
Anyway, this seems pretty bad. There's not really any leads, to me. How strange is it to have the spotlight on Pancake and Fircoal, then Sunstripe, and now me and Serbia. I'm not that sure, but I think one of us is scummy. All that information out there, against Sunstripe, seemed to be washed away.
Neutrino... Kinda weird right, to just pop in, you reading the last 5 pages, when there is more than that, and just vote me? Also after Gimpy voted for me.
Is thinking allowed really that scummy? Isn't that you're meant to do, post your thoughts? I was not actually defending myself, not at all. It may of came off like that, but seriously, I was not meant to be defending myself.
Gimpy and Neutrino.. Pretty closely tied I think.
FOS: Gimpy and Neutrino.
Hmmm?
The reason I didnt post until then is that I wasnt in the game until then. Id just replaced Airies, so I decided to have a quick read (of 5 pages) and vote the person who appeared the most scummy.
You were that person, but since we are so far away from a lynch (and unlikely to get one today anyway) it was really more of a powerful FOS.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Users browsing this forum: No registered users