Moderator: Community Team
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:On the plus side I get to do this.
Vote TheWierdOne FOS Skittles
If you arent with me, you are against me. Sure its strawman, however, from where I am sitting now, if you cant see the link between me and Nark then you are probably not my friend. I dont like your play and you are not my friend.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:On the plus side I get to do this.
Vote TheWierdOne FOS Skittles
If you arent with me, you are against me. Sure its strawman, however, from where I am sitting now, if you cant see the link between me and Nark then you are probably not my friend. I dont like your play and you are not my friend.
Yeah sure, but why would you and him argue for pages unnecessarily for you to just come out and say you have a connection, and that you are both town? Doesn't make sense to me, you both drew unnecessary attention to yourselves?
The Weird One wrote:Ragian wrote:Anyoen care for my thoughts on Marashu?
Please, for the love of all that may or may not be holy, don't ask this question....just give us your thoughts. If we didn't want one player's thoughts on another player, why would we be reading the bloody thread?
The Weird One wrote:Moving right along: here is a link to all of Marashu's contributions, thus far. Well, the first three are his contributions...the rest are other posts in the forum that are still there because my plebian mind can't wrap around the concept of limiting the advanced search...That seems like a convincing enough case on him, in my eyes...the complete lack of anything vaguely resembling contribution. That combined with it only being three posts kinda sets off a number of alarms, for me. Should pressure be applied in an attempt to get him to contribute more?
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Skittles! wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:On the plus side I get to do this.
Vote TheWierdOne FOS Skittles
If you arent with me, you are against me. Sure its strawman, however, from where I am sitting now, if you cant see the link between me and Nark then you are probably not my friend. I dont like your play and you are not my friend.
Yeah sure, but why would you and him argue for pages unnecessarily for you to just come out and say you have a connection, and that you are both town? Doesn't make sense to me, you both drew unnecessary attention to yourselves?
No, you are just scared that we are forming together against you. Be scared.
Your time is drawing to a close.
It was a fun game.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skoffin wrote:on mobile
Buju, could you state which of your points on masket still stand exactly so thst I may point out how their wrong?
BuJaber wrote:Fircoal wrote:
Let's go one by one.
@MM - Eh, what would his lynch answer? You're staying it'll provide teh most answers but what will it give us. I can see how he's suspcious but I don't think lynching him makes any more answers compared to anyone else. Also I counter that he's a good actor, but then again if he's scum he's also not the best scum either.(Sorry MM)
It could be helpful for me to decide if I can trust people voting for the same person I am. (And for everyone else, they have a bunch of voters they can analyze).
It could provide some solid information on trainers that proves/disproves theories, and again, allows us to analyze the people who were obsessed with figuring out how they fit in the game.
At that time of me posting that quote MM had the most votes, and the trainer debate was going on for a while, being the biggest flavor-related discussion and involved a lot of the players, therefore I said most answers. Yes maybe it's optimistic, but there comes a point where we'll have to reread every post very carefully after a few flips, and then we'll be able to find suspicious behavior among those that speculated about flavor (more or less everyone), and I think MM would be one of those lynches that can split up the players into groups for analysis.
Skittles! wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:On the plus side I get to do this.
Vote TheWierdOne FOS Skittles
If you arent with me, you are against me. Sure its strawman, however, from where I am sitting now, if you cant see the link between me and Nark then you are probably not my friend. I dont like your play and you are not my friend.
Yeah sure, but why would you and him argue for pages unnecessarily for you to just come out and say you have a connection, and that you are both town? Doesn't make sense to me, you both drew unnecessary attention to yourselves?
aage wrote:I initially didn't join this game because I expected the exact thing Tim just did was gonna happen again and I didn't wanna deal with that again. Mandy asked me if I was ready to sub last night, I said yes and here we are. Fml.
This has never worked before but I'll just say it again. Tim, stop claiming day one for no reason. You're not helping anyone.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Dont know if he has been honest with name claim. Do know he is not scum.
Anark, Doom and Bujaber are also not scum.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:On the plus side I get to do this.
Vote TheWierdOne FOS Skittles
If you arent with me, you are against me. Sure its strawman, however, from where I am sitting now, if you cant see the link between me and Nark then you are probably not my friend. I dont like your play and you are not my friend.
Yeah sure, but why would you and him argue for pages unnecessarily for you to just come out and say you have a connection, and that you are both town? Doesn't make sense to me, you both drew unnecessary attention to yourselves?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
madmitch wrote:Wing you said Anark ,Doom and Bujaber are not scumwith you that is 4 ,How many are there usually on Team Rocket
![]()
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
madmitch wrote:Wing you said Anark ,Doom and Bujaber are not scumwith you that is 4 ,How many are there usually on Team Rocket
![]()
madmitch wrote:First Welcome Aage, I usually trust Wings judgement so vote TWO
Skoffin wrote:
Fircoal - you know, your long posts here have surprised me as it's not what I remember you for back in the day. Then again maybe I shouldn't be that surprised as it has been a good while, weren't like like 16 at the timeAnyway, gotta say, your posts are a bit of a mess - that last post went on but ultimately you just said the same few things over and over (and over) again.
Skittles! wrote:strike wolf wrote:Says some things about the game. Posts a bit on irrelevant things about trainers that is unlikely to become important and finishes with no conclusion. His main contribute is saying that he leans town on Masket but leaves it open enough that he could vote him later on. My main takeaway? Skittles is one of the many players I still need to find time to reread because at the very least this post rubs me the wrong way.
And of course Nag's (who I also have added to the prod list, PM already sent) quad post back on page thirteen which also says next to nothing and finishes with a pot meet kettle vote on Legionnaire. Though on the other hand, the main point I note from the quad post was the first to really put down the Nark typo case as nothing so counter point.
Apparently trying to figure out how the game could possibly be laid out is a bad thing. It may be unimportant later in the game but it could also be important, I don't know and that's why I'm trying to get a discussion going on this. As I've mentioned numerous times, I haven't played mafia for years, so I'm rusty. My 'scumdar' (lol) isn't on point, and there are too many reasonable arguments going on that don't sway me one way or another because they aren't convincing me that well. While I know that I can unvote, I don't want to go jump on a bandwagon unless I'm 90% sure we will get the right pick for the day.
I just find it interesting that you literally ignore all the posts of mine that try and figure out what the make up of the game could be, being based on how Mandy wrote the rules and the intro post, as well as going off other people's ideas. Where do you think we should go from here? I don't want D1 to last much longer either. Make up a good argument that convinces me and I'll vote with you, until then start creating discussions.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:TWao, Skittles and Fircoal appear banded together imo
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
strike wolf wrote:Tim is difficult to read due to his craziness but a couple of his recent turns as mafia show he's a bit more clever than he's some times given credit for. His backing off is odd to me. Like someone backing off because he felt the heat.
dakky21 wrote:madmitch wrote:Wing you said Anark ,Doom and Bujaber are not scumwith you that is 4 ,How many are there usually on Team Rocket
madmitch wrote:First Welcome Aage, I usually trust Wings judgement so vote TWO
So first you think Wing could be 4th of Team Rocket and then you trust his judgement? My vote stays on you mate, D2 as well.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Skittles! wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Dont know if he has been honest with name claim. Do know he is not scum.
Anark, Doom and Bujaber are also not scum.
Have you maybe not thought about realising who each town player is? Or is your goal to say who each player is and what their affiliation is so we can weed out who the mafia and possibkevthird townies are? If so, bravo, but if there is not actual thought process behind your posts, then please stop. It's not doing the rest of the town any good to have their positions out in the open for Scum to pick off?
unvote for now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users