Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Serbia wrote:I'm voting for Gary Johnson. Not because I really believe in him as a candidate, but because I do like him better than either of the main party candidates, and because I'd love to see a viable third party rise up. And overall, the Libertarian platform is more in line with my beliefs - fiscally conservative while socially liberal.
Symmetry wrote:I'd vote Clinton. Johnson has always seemed like a cop out vote for the internet generation, much like Libertarianism as a whole. Sounds fine in theory, but has little life in practice. Any third party needs to start from grassroots. Local government, then state, then national. Libertarians don't really have the support, or will, to work that way.
Plus Johnson always looks like a deer in headlights whenever he gets asked even a moderately difficult question. If he's the best the party can do, using your vote for him seems almost irresponsible.
- Yale Law SchoolConfederateSS wrote:Clinton is not qualified to be dog catcher
Brags about his wealth, plasters his name on everything he touches in gold letters, and pays no taxes. Yep, just a regular American, just like you and me.ConfederateSS wrote:Trump is a regular American
...into the ground. Source Also relevantConfederateSS wrote:Trump has run a money empire...
Objectively false. Here's proof.ConfederateSS wrote:CLINTON ONLY CARES ABOUT CLINTON
True - no matter how racist, sexist, xenophobic, or otherwise disgusting his thoughts are, he will voice them without a second thought. Here's a list of all the people he's insulted - just on Twitter.ConfederateSS wrote:HE IS NOT SCARED TO SPEAK HIS MIND
Oh, he will - and he has.ConfederateSS wrote:HE WON'T LIE
Nope. He'll just put his name on it - and then bankrupt it.ConfederateSS wrote:He will shatter the Washington Country Club
We tried that, and it worked out pretty well for us - until we got dragged into World Wars I and II. After helping Europe put itself back together, we decided it would be a good idea to stop the Soviets from taking over the world - and I don't remember Europe complaining. Maybe we went (/are going) a bit overboard in other places, but we can at least say our intentions were (and are) noble.Dukasaur wrote:[...]Stop thinking you [the US] can solve the world's problems, stick to "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations -- entangling alliances with none" and you really don't need to know the details of what is happening in every corner of everybody else's country.
It's not only money. Trump has promised to decimate the already patchwork American healthcare system and to cut taxes for the wealthy at the expense of workers. He has promised to legitimize persecution of women, Muslims, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, the LGBTQ community, and people with disabilities, among others. He has also refused to promise to protect the nations of Europe from Russian aggression.Dukasaur wrote:Trump is a kleptomaniac and an egomaniac. He wants to rob people blind and have them tremble at his name. Well, that blows, sure enough...I think American can survive being ripped off by Trump. It's only money, you can always make more.
No, Clinton does not want that - Putin does. Clinton would have the US fight against Russia - Trump would have us stay out of it and allow Putin to take over the world. I may be exaggerating, but you get the idea.Dukasaur wrote:On the other hand, Clinton represents the military-industrial complex, and she want a full-scale resumption of the Cold War.
He would also betray the ideals of inclusion and tolerance for which America has been known for over a century, and set race and gender relations back at least 50 years.Dukasaur wrote:I don't want to minimize how terrible a Trump presidency will be. He will be the American answer to Kim Jong-Il, renaming things after himself, prancing about with a retinue of tens of thousands, building statues to himself while the people starve.
And Trump's "bomb[ing] the hell out of ISIS" wouldn't?Dukasaur wrote:At the very least, [a Clinton presidency] will continue the policy of destabilizing the Middle East and create a new generation of jihadists to trouble the world.
DoomYoshi wrote:Sempai, you have it all wrong. Politicians lie. Everything Trump has said he would do won't happen and everything Hilary has said she would do won't happen. You need to pick the opposite of campaigns to have any chance of making an educated vote.
Either way, Happy Election Day!!!
Anything less would have been an insult to our intelligence and to the importance of the matter at hand. Agree to disagree we will, then. Thank you.Dukasaur wrote:Good, thoughtful response sempai. I disagree with some particulars, but we can leave it at that. Good luck to your team today.
Serbia wrote:I'm voting for Gary Johnson. Not because I really believe in him as a candidate, but because I do like him better than either of the main party candidates, and because I'd love to see a viable third party rise up. And overall, the Libertarian platform is more in line with my beliefs - fiscally conservative while socially liberal.
Instead of actually considering my argument? All righty then, I guess.tzor wrote:A few points to consider:
National Socialist does not equal Democratic Socialist. The American Nazi Party has endorsed Trump and would never endorse the Jewish Bernie Sanders.tzor wrote:The guy Germany elected belonged to the National Socialist Party.
WAS - 150 years ago. The Republican Party IS - today - the party of the KKK.tzor wrote:The Democratic party was the party of White Southern Slave Owners.
Can you prove that?tzor wrote:Hillary Clinton wanted a drone strike on Jullian Assange.
Again, can you prove that?tzor wrote:Worked with party leaders to rig the whole nomination process in spite of the popular support for Bernie Sanders
I will concede your point re: healthcare, but the labor participation rate was worse than it is now as recently as 1978, and it started declining when the Great Recession hit - before Obama took office - thanks to the Bush 43 policy of deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy - which Trump, of course, wants to continue.tzor wrote:And [Hillary] claims by doing the exact same things that has brought healthcare to the point of near collapse and the worst labor participation rate in history that the nation will become perfect
Sure, let's go back to the good old days of 60-hour work weeks, child labor, routine work-related deaths, corporate monopolies, and having to buy everything you needed from the company store, when women couldn't vote and African-Americans were lucky to be considered people.tzor wrote:Just say no to Progressivism / Socialism / Communism.
sempaispellcheck wrote:WAS - 150 years ago. The Republican Party IS - today - the party of the KKK.tzor wrote:The Democratic party was the party of White Southern Slave Owners.
sempai
Users browsing this forum: No registered users