DirtyDishSoap wrote:Can you two f*ck now? I have this camcorder all ready and everything.
I hope it's set up in a hotel room in Saudi. It'll be the last we see of those creatures.
Moderator: Community Team
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Can you two f*ck now? I have this camcorder all ready and everything.
PLAYER57832 wrote:What laws is she supposed to have broken? What information has she been proven to have leaked?
mrswdk wrote:then why is there not some enthusiastic and rich Clinton hater/law lover funding the prosecution against her?
patches70 wrote:The FBI director didn't bring charges because of funding, funding isn't the problem. The FBI director, in this case at least, decided that it wasn't up to the FBI to determine who the next President is.
If the FBI did bring charges, Clinton would be finished, virtually giving the Presidency to Trump. The director instead turned over the decision to the voters, which was probably the right thing to do.
Don't get me wrong, I believe Clinton should be tossed straight into jail for all the malfeasance she's committed over the decades, but it's not in the FBI's power to throw an election into such chaos at this point in time.
tzor wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:What laws is she supposed to have broken? What information has she been proven to have leaked?
There is an espionage act. The FBI made the perfect case for the breaking of the law and then saved her at the last moment by throwing in the word "Intent" which was not actually in the law (really, what is "intentional negligence" people who do things out of negligence do not wake up one day and intend to do that). Mark Levin – Hillary Clinton Violated The Espionage Act – Section 793 Penal Code
As for information leaked. We have a DEAD Iranian spy. How did Iran get that information? We can't prove it positively, but enough emails were on Clinton's server to effectively give his name away. How many more people are or will be DEAD because of this? She has more dead people under her than the average Mafia Godfather.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
mrswdk wrote:If Clinton did actually break the law and the FBI is failing to hold her to account, then why is there not some enthusiastic and rich Clinton hater/law lover funding the prosecution against her?
patches70 wrote:This is it for her. This is her last chance. If she loses then she'll go off into the sunset ...
notyou2 wrote:The republicans have never shed any blood. You should vote for them.
tzor wrote:notyou2 wrote:The republicans have never shed any blood. You should vote for them.
Interesting I mention a specific and you counter with a generality.
If you want to know, however, NEVER VOTE FOR JEB BUSH.
Happy?
patches70 wrote:You're reading comprehension is almost as bad as sym's
tzor wrote:notyou2 wrote:The republicans have never shed any blood. You should vote for them.
Interesting I mention a specific and you counter with a generality.
If you want to know, however, NEVER VOTE FOR JEB BUSH.
Happy?
warmonger1981 wrote:Why not vote for people who can break the law without persecution?
notyou2 wrote:So did you vote for this criminal both times Tzor? Yeah, I thought so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users