Sucky...

by **yeti_c** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:24 am

Just "won" this game from a DB that didn't turn up... 477426

But they were clever and made it a termy game...

I think 1v1's shouldn't be Terminator...

C.

by **Aegnor** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:00 am

yeti_c wrote:Just "won" this game from a DB that didn't turn up... 477426

But they were clever and made it a termy game...

I think 1v1's shouldn't be Terminator...

C.

Good point. Until there's a solution, just avoid them.

by **wicked** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:10 pm

You can still get the points from this. You just need to clear out his armies.

by **poo-maker** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:12 pm

I dont think that yeti can take another turn. It says that he won the game.

by **wicked** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:41 pm

oh right.

by **yeti_c** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:44 pm

It's a good scam for avoiding loss of points... If you start a 1v1 and dislike your starting position... you can just DB out of it!!

C.

by **Velvecarrots** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:52 pm

Way to inflate your win % =D>

by **wicked** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:55 pm

yeti_c wrote:It's a good scam for avoiding loss of points... If you start a 1v1 and dislike your starting position... you can just DB out of it!!

C.

Good point. If you don't mind, please make a suggestion in the suggestions forum. I don't think Lack foresaw this scenario. Although, I imagine it's hard to have a bad starting position when you own 1/3 of the board, but I'm sure anything's possible!!

by **freezie** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:29 pm

wicked wrote:
yeti_c wrote:It's a good scam for avoiding loss of points... If you start a 1v1 and dislike your starting position... you can just DB out of it!!

C.

Good point. If you don't mind, please make a suggestion in the suggestions forum. I don't think Lack foresaw this scenario. Although, I imagine it's hard to have a bad starting position when you own 1/3 of the board, but I'm sure anything's possible!!

You might be right...But it's comon that someone will get a MUCH better position than the other.

So yes..Termy got to be fixed in 1 vs 1.

by **tahitiwahini** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:39 pm

In another thread someone brought up the idea that deadbeats should lose points when they deadbeat a terminator game (perhaps using the last player alive's score to determine the loss). The idea made sense to me. He further wanted the deadbeat's points to go to the last player alive, which I'm not sure is a such a great idea. But making a deadbeat lose points for deadbeating a game sounds like an improvement to me.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20866

by **civver** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:46 pm

yeti_c wrote:Just "won" this game from a DB that didn't turn up... 477426

But they were clever and made it a termy game...

I think 1v1's shouldn't be Terminator...

C.

The way CC handles deadbeats needs a lot of work. :lol: