Conquer Club

flat earth vs ""'science'""

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:45 pm

Serbia wrote:Exactly. Rooted in religion.


Way too many twisteds for my taste.

OK let's go with this religion. I'm assuming, for the moment you mean the Christian Religion. That's the religion that gave us images like this ...

Image

What's in his left hand? That's a Globus cruciger. It represents the earth, as a sphere.

Holding the world in one's hand, or more ominously, under one's foot, has been used as a symbol since antiquity. To citizens of the Roman Empire, the plain round globe held by Jupiter represented the world, or the universe, as the dominion held by the emperor. A 2nd-century coin from the reign of Emperor Hadrian shows the Roman goddess Salus with her foot upon a globus, and a 4th-century coin from the reign of Emperor Constantine I shows her with a globus in hand. The orbis terrarum was central to the iconography of the Tetrarchy, representing the Tetrarchs' restoration of security to the Roman world. Constantine I claimed to have had a vision of a cross above the sun, with the words "In this sign, you shall conquer", at the Battle of Milvian Bridge in 312. His soldiers painted crosses upon their shields, and then defeated their foe, Maxentius.

With the growth of Christianity in the 5th century, the orb (in Latin scriptures orbis terrarum, the 'world of the lands', hence the word "orb") was topped with a cross (hence globus cruciger), symbolising the Christian God's dominion over the world. The emperor held the world in his hand, to show that he ruled it on God's behalf. To non-Christians already familiar with the pagan globe, the surmounting of a cross sent a message about the triumph of Christianity. In medieval iconography, an object's size, relative to that of nearby objects, indicated its relative importance; so the world was small and the one who held it was large, to emphasize the nature of their relationship


It's a globe, not a pancake.

Here is an icon for comparison. Again, it's a globe not a pancake. "Religion" has nothing to do with this flat earth nonsense.

Image
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby UCAbears on Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:38 am

Do architects account for the curviture of the earth whilst building bridges?
User avatar
Cook UCAbears
 
Posts: 3199
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Madagascar

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:11 am

UCAbears wrote:Do architects account for the curviture of the earth whilst building bridges?


No, but no bridge is actually level with the surface of the earth. Large bridges are actually designed to be quite bouncy.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:32 am

tzor wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Do architects account for the curviture of the earth whilst building bridges?


No, but no bridge is actually level with the surface of the earth. Large bridges are actually designed to be quite bouncy.

Click image to enlarge.
image

By Didier Descouens - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... d=44163562
Ponte delle Tette is a small bridge in Venice, Italy. It takes its name ("Bridge of the Tits") from the use of the bridge by prostitutes, who were encouraged to stand topless there to entice and convert suspected homosexuals.[1]

The Carampane di Rialto was one of the red-light districts of Venice in the fifteenth century, by official decree. Sex workers there would open their legs wide or display their breasts from nearby balconies to attract business. The Serenissima supported this heterosexual sex in order to help stem the tide of a growing wave of homosexuality, which had grown into a social problem. By 1509, one writer estimated that there were some 11,565 courtesans working in Venice. Nearby was the Traghetto Del Buso, where courtesans crossed the Grand Canal to another legal red light district, again per orders of the Serenissima. Taxes on prostitution in 1519 helped finance excavation at the Arsenale.
ā€œā€ŽLife is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.ā€
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28134
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby UCAbears on Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:40 am

Dukasaur wrote:
tzor wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Do architects account for the curviture of the earth whilst building bridges?


No, but no bridge is actually level with the surface of the earth. Large bridges are actually designed to be quite bouncy.

Click image to enlarge.
image

By Didier Descouens - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... d=44163562
Ponte delle Tette is a small bridge in Venice, Italy. It takes its name ("Bridge of the Tits") from the use of the bridge by prostitutes, who were encouraged to stand topless there to entice and convert suspected homosexuals.[1]

The Carampane di Rialto was one of the red-light districts of Venice in the fifteenth century, by official decree. Sex workers there would open their legs wide or display their breasts from nearby balconies to attract business. The Serenissima supported this heterosexual sex in order to help stem the tide of a growing wave of homosexuality, which had grown into a social problem. By 1509, one writer estimated that there were some 11,565 courtesans working in Venice. Nearby was the Traghetto Del Buso, where courtesans crossed the Grand Canal to another legal red light district, again per orders of the Serenissima. Taxes on prostitution in 1519 helped finance excavation at the Arsenale.


That bridge was definitely pretty bouncy, by the sounds of it.
User avatar
Cook UCAbears
 
Posts: 3199
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Madagascar

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby jonesthecurl on Mon Jun 06, 2016 2:14 pm

Sorting through my books I found something called "Is the Bible from Heaven? Is the Earth a globe?" from the late 1800's. I don't have time to talk more about it now, I'm off to catch a plane - but it seems to have a lot of stuff that flatties are still using.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jonesthecurl
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Location: disused action figure warehouse

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:56 pm

tzor, I'm going to forgive your ignorance, because you're, well, ignorant. When I say something is "rooted in religion", that doesn't make it "right". ISIS is "rooted in religion". I'm not debating the legitimacy of their interpretation of Islam, just like I'm not debating the legitimacy of Christians believing in a flat earth. To be honest with you, and in fact any follower of any religion, to presume that you are correct in your beliefs while casting doubt on the faith of others has always been amazing to me, but that's not what we're talking about right now. For some, rightly or wrongly according to your version of the religion, their version of the same religion calls them to believe in a flat earth. I am not interested in your religious examples of "proof", science is all the evidence I need to justify my belief. But for some, whether you agree or not, their belief in a flat earth IS a matter of religion. This is not up for debate, and is extremely presumptuous of you to argue.

If you seek a religious debate, go seek these religious flat-earthers out and have your stupid debate. I'll offer you a warning though; if you come at them with the writings and art of man, you will be dismissed. Their evidence comes from the bible, not man's pathetic drawings.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:30 pm

In fact, the more I think about your argument the more laughable and ridiculous I find it. You're trying to tell me that the beliefs of someone I am related to, and know personally, aren't based on religion without any evidence to the contrary. And, your arguments against are based on Catholic iconography, which your OWN DESCRIPTION OF tells me is rooted in paganism! Never mind the fact that early Christians would have pointed out to you that these drawings depicting their Lord are "graven images" and were considered idolatrous. I'm not a religious flat-earther, yet even I can completely dismiss your feeble attempts by using your own arguments against you.

You don't know what you're talking about tzor. Give it up.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby hotfire on Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:03 pm

where is the like button?
User avatar
Colonel hotfire
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby william18 on Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:07 pm

tzor wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Do architects account for the curviture of the earth whilst building bridges?


No, but no bridge is actually level with the surface of the earth. Large bridges are actually designed to be quite bouncy.


Bridges are supposed to withstand moderate storms and earthquakes. They shouldn't be so rigid as to require consideration of the earth curvature during it's design.
Sergeant 1st Class william18
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:39 am

Serbia wrote:tzor, I'm going to forgive your ignorance, because you're, well, ignorant.


Psychologically projecting much are we?

Serbia wrote:When I say something is "rooted in religion", that doesn't make it "right".


And when you say something is "rooted in science" that doesn't make it right either. Remember Phrenology?

Serbia wrote:I'm not debating the legitimacy of their interpretation of Islam, just like I'm not debating the legitimacy of Christians believing in a flat earth. To be honest with you, and in fact any follower of any religion, to presume that you are correct in your beliefs while casting doubt on the faith of others has always been amazing to me, but that's not what we're talking about right now.


But you have to bring it up. The smugness in your text is so deep I have to use a steam shovel to dig it up. If we are not talking about it, why did you bring it up? The "legitimacy" of some people in the name of religion to prove a flat earth is as false as the "legitimacy" of people claiming "in the name of science" that bumps on your head prove you are a criminal. Admit it, you hate religion so any time you can see an attachment of something bad to a claim of "religion" you raise it high for all to see.

Flat Earth has as much to do with religion as it does with science ... that is NOTHING AT ALL.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:06 am

tzor, you're a presumptuous fool, and I do not say that lightly. Hate religion? You obviously do not know me.

I'd love for you to look my cousin directly in the eye and try to tell him that his belief in a flat earth has nothing to do with religion. That's a debate you can never win. In fact, sir, how dare you question another's faith. You truly are a fool.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:53 am

Serbia wrote:I'd love for you to look my cousin directly in the eye and try to tell him that his belief in a flat earth has nothing to do with religion.


Why? I have a friend of mine who is a DEMOCRAT. I could explain to her why she's wrong until the cows come home and it still won't matter. When people don't want to listen they don't listen ... PERIOD. His insistence doesn't make it true. His fake excuses doesn't make it true. Whether those fake excuses invoke religion, science or even politics.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:44 pm

tzor wrote:
Serbia wrote:I'd love for you to look my cousin directly in the eye and try to tell him that his belief in a flat earth has nothing to do with religion.


Why? I have a friend of mine who is a DEMOCRAT. I could explain to her why she's wrong until the cows come home and it still won't matter. When people don't want to listen they don't listen ... PERIOD. His insistence doesn't make it true. His fake excuses doesn't make it true. Whether those fake excuses invoke religion, science or even politics.


This obviously is beyond your comprehension.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby notyou2 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:56 pm

Serb you are arguing with a zealot.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby notyou2 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:58 pm

He claims he is catholic, yet he says the pope is wrong. He's a dinosaur from another era.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby riskllama on Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:02 pm

wrong about what, exactly?
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby DoomYoshi on Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:45 pm

Serbia wrote:tzor, you're a presumptuous fool, and I do not say that lightly. Hate religion? You obviously do not know me.

I'd love for you to look my cousin directly in the eye and try to tell him that his belief in a flat earth has nothing to do with religion. That's a debate you can never win. In fact, sir, how dare you question another's faith. You truly are a fool.


So here's a question. If something is "false" hockey and is in fact baseball, can you say you are going to a hockey game at Fenway park?

Similarly, I spent much time trying to convince universalschiro and AslantheKing that creationism has no Christian precedent before the 1800s. Therefore, it is from "false" Christianity and I could just as well call it hockey.

So under your definition, I could just as easily say your cousin's beliefs are rooted in hockey, could I not?

People hold beliefs because of social groups, not because of any roots at all.
ā–‘ā–’ā–’ā–“ā–“ā–“ā–’ā–’ā–‘
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby notyou2 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:33 pm

riskllama wrote:wrong about what, exactly?


Adam and Eve, evolution and the creation of the universe.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby riskllama on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:38 pm

well, i was kinda waiting for tzors' response, but thx 4 responding!!!
=D> =D> =D>
:twisted:
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby notyou2 on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:50 pm

riskllama wrote:well, i was kinda waiting for tzors' response, but thx 4 responding!!!
=D> =D> =D>
:twisted:


I assumed you were talking to me, especially considering your question appeared to be directly related to my comment above it.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:58 pm

DoomYoshi wrote:
Serbia wrote:tzor, you're a presumptuous fool, and I do not say that lightly. Hate religion? You obviously do not know me.

I'd love for you to look my cousin directly in the eye and try to tell him that his belief in a flat earth has nothing to do with religion. That's a debate you can never win. In fact, sir, how dare you question another's faith. You truly are a fool.


So here's a question. If something is "false" hockey and is in fact baseball, can you say you are going to a hockey game at Fenway park?

Similarly, I spent much time trying to convince universalschiro and AslantheKing that creationism has no Christian precedent before the 1800s. Therefore, it is from "false" Christianity and I could just as well call it hockey.

So under your definition, I could just as easily say your cousin's beliefs are rooted in hockey, could I not?

People hold beliefs because of social groups, not because of any roots at all.


What the fuck are you going on about?
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:23 pm

notyou2 wrote:Adam and Eve, evolution and the creation of the universe.


Wait one second. Are you saying that I have stated that the Pope is wrong on "Adam and Eve, evolution and the creation of the universe?"

That's impossible. I don't even know Pope Francis quotes on "Adam and Eve, evolution and the creation of the universe."

And I'm not a Dinosaur. I have a diaphragm. (It's hard to do a capella singing without one.)

Speaking of which, it's time for a really bad musical evolution joke.

This scientist approached one day this Rock and Roll singer. "You know,'" he stated. "You realize that you descended from the monkeys."

The singer looked in shock. "I don't think so. I'm pretty sure I descended from the beatles."

What can I say? It's been a hard day's night.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby tzor on Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:28 pm

Serbia wrote:What the **** are you going on about?


Space shuttles flying o'er your head.
But that doesn't mean that you are currently brain dead,
Thinking's not for ye,
No
You'll never understand what needs no explaining,
Because you see
You're too dumb to argue with me.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

Postby Serbia on Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:32 pm

tzor wrote:
Serbia wrote:What the :twisted: fuck are you going on about?


Space shuttles flying o'er your head.
But that doesn't mean that you are currently brain dead,
Thinking's not for ye,
No
You'll never understand what needs no explaining,
Because you see
You're too dumb to argue with me.


Fucking fixed the word :twisted: "fuck", ya fucking prude.

Bollocks, fuckhead. :twisted:
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron