Rate the burka (sexy, NSFW)

[Symmetry]

Psst, Sym, you already posted that image. In this very thread. Not five hours earlier. If you won't pay attention to what you post, why should the rest of us?

Bollocks.

Aww man, good catch. I post in a couple of forums, and I know that's no excuse, but I must have got mixed up.



This one includes a couple of other versions of the veil.

[GoranZ]

I guess Muslims all look the same to you though.

No all Muslims act the same regardless how they are dressed
New York, Madrid, London, Paris, Brussels and many more have same scars made by Muslims.

Serbia, what's your take on Serbian leader Radovan Karadzic being tried for massacring Muslims?

Radovan Karadzic was never sentenced for massacring Muslims, he was sentenced for ordering of ethnic massacres of Bosniaks and Croats.
But how can ignorant Muslim like you cant know the difference

[riskllama]

ha, u said "bosniak"...

[Symmetry]

I guess Muslims all look the same to you though.

No all Muslims act the same regardless how they are dressed
New York, Madrid, London, Paris, Brussels and many more have same scars made by Muslims.

Serbia, what's your take on Serbian leader Radovan Karadzic being tried for massacring Muslims?

Radovan Karadzic was never sentenced for massacring Muslims, he was sentenced for ordering of ethnic massacres of Bosniaks and Croats.
But how can ignorant Muslim like you cant know the difference

You are welcome to read the judgement-

It can be found here:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement_summary.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjWiKPYqN_LAhULDZoKHVphDGsQqG8IGzAA&usg=AFQjCNEsn_wagAZMnwEz3IPEvVa6j3luRA

It's a PDF, if that bothers you.

But anyway, here's what he was found guilty of:

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

JCE stands for Joint Criminal Enterprise.

So there we have it, Goran. He was sentenced for massacring Muslims.

[GoranZ]

I guess Muslims all look the same to you though.

No all Muslims act the same regardless how they are dressed
New York, Madrid, London, Paris, Brussels and many more have same scars made by Muslims.

Serbia, what's your take on Serbian leader Radovan Karadzic being tried for massacring Muslims?

Radovan Karadzic was never sentenced for massacring Muslims, he was sentenced for ordering of ethnic massacres of Bosniaks and Croats.
But how can ignorant Muslim like you cant know the difference

You are welcome to read the judgement-

It can be found here:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement_summary.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjWiKPYqN_LAhULDZoKHVphDGsQqG8IGzAA&usg=AFQjCNEsn_wagAZMnwEz3IPEvVa6j3luRA

It's a PDF, if that bothers you.

But anyway, here's what he was found guilty of:

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

JCE stands for Joint Criminal Enterprise.

So there we have it, Goran. He was sentenced for massacring Muslims.

I was born in Yugoslavia, I'm much more aware what happened in Yugoslavia's civil war then you, and who targeted who, and why. Serbs from Bosnia(predominately Orthodox), targeted Croats from Bosnia(predominately Catholic) and Bosniaks(predominately Muslim). At the beginning of the civil war majority of the population of Bosnia was more atheist than religious. The civil war was with ethnic character, not with religious one.
While Macedonia was part of Yugoslavia Bosnian Muslims/Muslims as you refer them, were not known by that name, they are not known by that name even now. They are known as "Бошњаци" in Macedonian or Bosniak if it is translated to English. Even my country uses Bosniak as name for the minority. Bosnian Muslims is the name used by the western media which were bribed from gulf states.
So no, Bosnian Muslims or Muslims(as you say) were not the only ones that were victims in Srebrenica massacre.

Even CIA Fact Book has updated its info...

Bosniak has replaced Muslim as an ethnic term in part to avoid confusion with the religious term Muslim.

You understand now or I have to draw it again?

[Symmetry]

It's not just me calling his victims Muslims, it's literally in the summary of the court, that I posted.

He was literally sentenced for massacring Muslims. That was what he was sentenced for.

Do I have to post the judgement again? The one where he's found guilty of massacring Muslims?

That's not a media thing- that's the summary judgement of the court.

It's the judge saying, unequivocally, that he was responsible for massacring Muslims .

I really don't know how else to get this through to you

[GabonX]

It's not just me calling his victims Muslims, it's literally in the summary of the court, that I posted.

He was literally sentenced for massacring Muslims. That was what he was sentenced for.

Do I have to post the judgement again? The one where he's found guilty of massacring Muslims?

That's not a media thing- that's the summary judgement of the court.

It's the judge saying, unequivocally, that he was responsible for massacring Muslims .

I really don't know how else to get this through to you

Actually you quoted the indictment from the prosecution, not the "summary judgement of the court" as you allege. To put things in their proper context:

In the Indictment, the Prosecution alleged that the Accused participated in four joint
criminal enterprises (―JCEs‖). The Prosecution alleged the following:

From at least October 1991 to 30 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE, the
objective of which was to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from
Bosnian Serb-claimed territory in BiH through the crimes charged therein (―Overarching
JCE‖);

Between April 1992 and November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to establish
and carry out a campaign of sniping and shelling against the civilian population of Sarajevo,
the primary purpose of which was to spread terror among the civilian population (―Sarajevo
JCE‖);

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to
take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to
abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);
Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the
Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the
men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some
elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

In reference to the above paragraphs, the document goes on to state:

However, it should be noted that this is only a summary and does not in any way form
part of the Judgement of the Chamber. The only authoritative account of the findings of the
Chamber is in the written Judgement. Confidential copies will be made available to the
Parties at the end of these proceedings, and a public redacted version will also be made
available to the public.

... So maybe you'll want to read over things more closely next time you try to antagonize the fora, especially if you've just ridiculed other members for making statements when "they have literally no clue what they're talking about though" less than a page back.

[GabonX]

s

You guys really should be posting documentation indicating these women are of an appropriate age. How are we supposed to judge whether or not they have a "child's face" if they're wearing burkas?

It's not necessary to guess. If there's any doubt whatsoever, play it safe and don't post them.

It's not the facial looks that determine age, duh.

TA1LGUNN3R disagrees with you.
viewtopic.php?p=4800186#p4800186

I'm just trying to understand the standards here, because right now this is dangerous sexual anarchy.

As pubescent teens enter adulthood, their bodies experience morphological changes. While humorous that you seem to disagree here, one of the changes in both males and females is the filling out of the face as circulating estradiol and testoserone affect bone growth.

So yes, faces are certainly an indicator of age. Go look at even your high school pics and you'll look a lot different. Suck it up, cupcake.

-TG

See PD_Sanders?

We need an expert like TA1LGUNN3R to render judgement on a woman's testosterone levels based on physical observations of her jawbone line, thereby enabling him to determine the precise age of a female in question, at which point he will make a declaration as to whether or not we can state she is attractive.

I'll admit I'm learning a lot about how to temper male sexuality in these topics but there's still much I don't know, and I'm certain that if images of women are displayed here in any of the various types of burka that symmetry posted which cover a woman's face, "TG" will not be able to determine her internal circulation of estradiol or testosterone levels, and thereby will not be able to indicate to us the appropriateness of rendering judgment in regards to her attractiveness and displaying those images here.

[GabonX]

You guys really should be posting documentation indicating these women are of an appropriate age. How are we supposed to judge whether or not they have a "child's face" if they're wearing burkas?

It's not necessary to guess. If there's any doubt whatsoever, play it safe and don't post them.

Get your kiddy porn elsewhere gabon. This is an adult thread.

I haven't posted any pornography or children, and it's disgusting that you would make such a slanderous statement because of petty issues you've taken up with me. There are real victims of these crimes and they deserve better than to have you demean their struggles by making making light of them because you don't like somebody on the internet.

It seems to me that you're one of those people that will say or do anything to besmirch someone you disagree with. Whether it's denouncing racism, but then hurling racist epithets at the people you've denounced, or making these groundless accusations here, you've shown yourself to be someone with no class and quite possibly a very low level of intelligence.

Quite frankly with the actions you've taken, you have more dignity if you have less intelligence because at least you would have an excuse for this behavior.

Reported.

[mrswdk]

Voting's over and the kinkily athletic Jasmine averaged a score of 5.3 from those who voted. Congratulations to Jasmine!

Next up, contestant number 2: Fellaini.

She may be sporting a designer bag but don't worry, that doesn't mean she's married - that bag was purchased by her father!

[TA1LGUNN3R]

s

You guys really should be posting documentation indicating these women are of an appropriate age. How are we supposed to judge whether or not they have a "child's face" if they're wearing burkas?

It's not necessary to guess. If there's any doubt whatsoever, play it safe and don't post them.

It's not the facial looks that determine age, duh.

TA1LGUNN3R disagrees with you.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 6#p4800186

I'm just trying to understand the standards here, because right now this is dangerous sexual anarchy.

As pubescent teens enter adulthood, their bodies experience morphological changes. While humorous that you seem to disagree here, one of the changes in both males and females is the filling out of the face as circulating estradiol and testoserone affect bone growth.

So yes, faces are certainly an indicator of age. Go look at even your high school pics and you'll look a lot different. Suck it up, cupcake.

-TG

See PD_Sanders?

We need an expert like TA1LGUNN3R to render judgement on a woman's testosterone levels based on physical observations of her jawbone line, thereby enabling him to determine the precise age of a female in question, at which point he will make a declaration as to whether or not we can state she is attractive.

I'll admit I'm learning a lot about how to temper male sexuality in these topics but there's still much I don't know, and I'm certain that if images of women are displayed here in any of the various types of burka that symmetry posted which cover a woman's face, "TG" will not be able to determine her internal circulation of estradiol or testosterone levels, and thereby will not be able to indicate to us the appropriateness of rendering judgment in regards to her attractiveness and displaying those images here.

Hey, I'm a helper, what can I say. Let me give you a few more bits of advice:

• Avoid buying a large economy style van--with your tendencies, people might mistake it for a rape van
• Don't engage with any children--being as you can't distinguish between under-developed and developed enough, let's steer clear, shall we?
• Under no circumstances should you grow a mustache
• Take a vacation around Halloween time
• Don't frequent any parks
• 15 gets you 20

If ever you find yourself in trouble, play it safe and walk away.

-TG

[mrswdk]

To be honest, the age of the female is irrelevant. If you can see any exposed skin whatsoever your first thought shouldn't be anything other than 'are there any rocks nearby I can throw at this harlot?'.

So waddya think of Fellaini's smoldering eyes?

[tkr4lf]

This thread made me laugh.

[waauw]

To be honest, the age of the female is irrelevant. If you can see any exposed skin whatsoever your first thought shouldn't be anything other than 'are there any rocks nearby I can throw at this harlot?'.

So waddya think of Fellaini's smoldering eyes?

This Fellaini?

[mrswdk]

No, you cockburglar, the Fellaini in OP.

[mandalorian2298]

Ah- the Karadzic defence. Guess I should have expected that.

Bollocks.

QED

That's not how you use QED, given Serb's GIF only proves is that he's untouched by your trolling.

Here is how you use QED:

You tried to troll a guy named "Serbia".

You got called out for ignorance by a guy from Macedonia and for sub-par trolling by a guy from Croatia.

----------------------------------------------

Your trollage was unimpressive.

QED

P.S. On the bright side you did a much better job helping the nations of ex-Yu move past their differences then any other British diplomat. You should be knighted for that.

[mrswdk]

Maybe Symmetry is just a creation of the mods, wheeled out any time the forums start getting hostile to act as a common enemy and unify everyone. Or wheeled out as a distraction every time people start getting shitty about the state of the website.

Whoever rated Fellaini a '1', take note that I will find you and make you pay.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Ah- the Karadzic defence. Guess I should have expected that.

Bollocks.

QED

That's not how you use QED, given Serb's GIF only proves is that he's untouched by your trolling.

Here is how you use QED:

You tried to troll a guy named "Serbia".

You got called out for ignorance by a guy from Macedonia and for sub-par trolling by a guy from Croatia.

----------------------------------------------

Your trollage was unimpressive.

QED

P.S. On the bright side you did a much better job helping the nations of ex-Yu move past their differences then any other British diplomat. You should be knighted for that.

Except it's literally quod erat demonstrandum. You have to make the statement, then end with the statement again after proving it.

-TG

[mandalorian2298]

Ah- the Karadzic defence. Guess I should have expected that.

Bollocks.

QED

That's not how you use QED, given Serb's GIF only proves is that he's untouched by your trolling.

Here is how you use QED:

You tried to troll a guy named "Serbia".

You got called out for ignorance by a guy from Macedonia and for sub-par trolling by a guy from Croatia.

----------------------------------------------

Your trollage was unimpressive.

QED

P.S. On the bright side you did a much better job helping the nations of ex-Yu move past their differences then any other British diplomat. You should be knighted for that.

Except it's literally quod erat demonstrandum. You have to make the statement, then end with the statement again after proving it.

-TG

You don't have to begin by explicitly stating "I am trying to prove statement X", as long as you finish with X and you have proven X. This is internet, not an exam, you nitpicker.

[Symmetry]

It's not just me calling his victims Muslims, it's literally in the summary of the court, that I posted.

He was literally sentenced for massacring Muslims. That was what he was sentenced for.

Do I have to post the judgement again? The one where he's found guilty of massacring Muslims?

That's not a media thing- that's the summary judgement of the court.

It's the judge saying, unequivocally, that he was responsible for massacring Muslims .

I really don't know how else to get this through to you

Actually you quoted the indictment from the prosecution, not the "summary judgement of the court" as you allege. To put things in their proper context:

In the Indictment, the Prosecution alleged that the Accused participated in four joint
criminal enterprises (―JCEs‖). The Prosecution alleged the following:

From at least October 1991 to 30 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE, the
objective of which was to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from
Bosnian Serb-claimed territory in BiH through the crimes charged therein (―Overarching
JCE‖);

Between April 1992 and November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to establish
and carry out a campaign of sniping and shelling against the civilian population of Sarajevo,
the primary purpose of which was to spread terror among the civilian population (―Sarajevo
JCE‖);

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to
take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to
abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);
Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the
Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the
men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some
elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

In reference to the above paragraphs, the document goes on to state:

However, it should be noted that this is only a summary and does not in any way form
part of the Judgement of the Chamber. The only authoritative account of the findings of the
Chamber is in the written Judgement. Confidential copies will be made available to the
Parties at the end of these proceedings, and a public redacted version will also be made
available to the public.

... So maybe you'll want to read over things more closely next time you try to antagonize the fora, especially if you've just ridiculed other members for making statements when "they have literally no clue what they're talking about though" less than a page back.

Mate, the full judgement runs to several hundred pages. The summary judgement, which I posted, very clearly sides with the prosecution, what with your darling being prosecuted and all.

[2dimes]

Maybe Symmetry is just a creation of the mods, wheeled out any time the forums start getting hostile to act as a common enemy and unify everyone. Or wheeled out as a distraction every time people start getting shitty about the state of the website.

Like Tay?

[Symmetry]

Maybe Symmetry is just a creation of the mods, wheeled out any time the forums start getting hostile to act as a common enemy and unify everyone. Or wheeled out as a distraction every time people start getting shitty about the state of the website.

Like Tay?

Is that Pig-Latin?

[Bernie Sanders]

I guess Muslims all look the same to you though.

No all Muslims act the same regardless how they are dressed
New York, Madrid, London, Paris, Brussels and many more have same scars made by Muslims.

Serbia, what's your take on Serbian leader Radovan Karadzic being tried for massacring Muslims?

Radovan Karadzic was never sentenced for massacring Muslims, he was sentenced for ordering of ethnic massacres of Bosniaks and Croats.
But how can ignorant Muslim like you cant know the difference

You are welcome to read the judgement-

It can be found here:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement_summary.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjWiKPYqN_LAhULDZoKHVphDGsQqG8IGzAA&usg=AFQjCNEsn_wagAZMnwEz3IPEvVa6j3luRA

It's a PDF, if that bothers you.

But anyway, here's what he was found guilty of:

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

JCE stands for Joint Criminal Enterprise.

So there we have it, Goran. He was sentenced for massacring Muslims.

I was born in Yugoslavia, I'm much more aware what happened in Yugoslavia's civil war then you, and who targeted who, and why. Serbs from Bosnia(predominately Orthodox), targeted Croats from Bosnia(predominately Catholic) and Bosniaks(predominately Muslim). At the beginning of the civil war majority of the population of Bosnia was more atheist than religious. The civil war was with ethnic character, not with religious one.
While Macedonia was part of Yugoslavia Bosnian Muslims/Muslims as you refer them, were not known by that name, they are not known by that name even now. They are known as "Бошњаци" in Macedonian or Bosniak if it is translated to English. Even my country uses Bosniak as name for the minority. Bosnian Muslims is the name used by the western media which were bribed from gulf states.
So no, Bosnian Muslims or Muslims(as you say) were not the only ones that were victims in Srebrenica massacre.

Even CIA Fact Book has updated its info...

Bosniak has replaced Muslim as an ethnic term in part to avoid confusion with the religious term Muslim.

You understand now or I have to draw it again?

Now we know the truth about your bigotry!

You're a right wing Serb, who thinks it was Serbs who were the innocent party.

[GoranZ]

I guess Muslims all look the same to you though.

No all Muslims act the same regardless how they are dressed
New York, Madrid, London, Paris, Brussels and many more have same scars made by Muslims.

Serbia, what's your take on Serbian leader Radovan Karadzic being tried for massacring Muslims?

Radovan Karadzic was never sentenced for massacring Muslims, he was sentenced for ordering of ethnic massacres of Bosniaks and Croats.
But how can ignorant Muslim like you cant know the difference

You are welcome to read the judgement-

It can be found here:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement_summary.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjWiKPYqN_LAhULDZoKHVphDGsQqG8IGzAA&usg=AFQjCNEsn_wagAZMnwEz3IPEvVa6j3luRA

It's a PDF, if that bothers you.

But anyway, here's what he was found guilty of:

Between approximately 26 May and 19 June 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to take hostage over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers in order to compel NATO to abstain from conducting air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets (―Hostages JCE‖);Between the days preceding 11 July 1995 and continuing until 1 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica by killing the men and boys of Srebrenica and forcibly removing the women, young children and some elderly men (―Srebrenica JCE‖).

JCE stands for Joint Criminal Enterprise.

So there we have it, Goran. He was sentenced for massacring Muslims.

I was born in Yugoslavia, I'm much more aware what happened in Yugoslavia's civil war then you, and who targeted who, and why. Serbs from Bosnia(predominately Orthodox), targeted Croats from Bosnia(predominately Catholic) and Bosniaks(predominately Muslim). At the beginning of the civil war majority of the population of Bosnia was more atheist than religious. The civil war was with ethnic character, not with religious one.
While Macedonia was part of Yugoslavia Bosnian Muslims/Muslims as you refer them, were not known by that name, they are not known by that name even now. They are known as "Бошњаци" in Macedonian or Bosniak if it is translated to English. Even my country uses Bosniak as name for the minority. Bosnian Muslims is the name used by the western media which were bribed from gulf states.
So no, Bosnian Muslims or Muslims(as you say) were not the only ones that were victims in Srebrenica massacre.

Even CIA Fact Book has updated its info...

Bosniak has replaced Muslim as an ethnic term in part to avoid confusion with the religious term Muslim.

You understand now or I have to draw it again?

Now we know the truth about your bigotry!

You're a right wing Serb, who thinks it was Serbs who were the innocent party.

April fulls joke? Or you haven't read what I wrote.

I have Macedonian and Croatian origin, which makes your "right wing Serb" statement rather useless.

[Bernie Sanders]

No such thing as Macedonian origin. Ask the Greeks about how you stole that name.

Croatian killing and raping Muslim women and children is well documented.

You are a small minded bigot who backs tyrants and murderers.