Conquer Club

Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Will the Repubs allow Obama to appoint a new justice?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby jgordon1111 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:23 pm

And I watched the video and read the statements they videoed the game why not show the people who did it why not have the sound of the chanting and racial diversity in the school two kids one possibly Latino the othe not sure, not real sure of the race population in that Iowa town but something seems a little off, and most of the other stuff was about Muslims in general, so again bigot yes, racist no proof,remember their are even Caucasian Muslims, maybe not many but he didn't say except them, and same time he didn't go out of his way to include Asian,indian,or African, he said ALL, bigot yes, racist no also take note the supposed school official that said it happened you don't see them at all, and the 2 kids shown look more like football players than basketball, and note practise was going on yet neither had on uniforms, strange stuff
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:21 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:so again why is the establishment trying to ensure TRUMP doesn't win even at the cost of billary winning?



Because in a Trump vs Hillary for President it is either cast your vote for Trump or cast your vote for Goldman Sachs.

Rubio, Cruz, Hillary are all Sachs candidates. Trump and Sanders are not.

The Economist just had an editorial about why Trump can't be allowed to win and you should see the list of who is on the board of directors for The Economist. They are the 1% of the 1% lemme tell ya.

And Trump ain't gonna build a wall. He's not going to kick the Muslims out or stop Muslim immigration. Congress has the purse strings so unless Trump wants to build the wall using his own money (which even he doesn't have nearly enough to pay for that) and the President doesn't make immigration law. He only says what he says to get votes, just like any other candidate making promises they know they can't keep.

Cruz's wife as you know works for Goldman Sachs. He also got a substantial loan from Goldman Sachs as well. The #1 campaign donor for Rubio is Goldman Sachs and as we all know Hillary been paid over $21 million since leaving the State department from investment banks with Goldman paying a nice chunk of that.

Goldman Sachs contributions to Trump? $0.

That's why the Republican establishment doesn't want Trump. It's why the Democrat establishment doesn't want Sanders. They ain't Sachs men.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby jgordon1111 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:33 pm

patches70 wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:so again why is the establishment trying to ensure TRUMP doesn't win even at the cost of billary winning?



Because in a Trump vs Hillary for President it is either cast your vote for Trump or cast your vote for Goldman Sachs.

Rubio, Cruz, Hillary are all Sachs candidates. Trump and Sanders are not.

The Economist just had an editorial about why Trump can't be allowed to win and you should see the list of who is on the board of directors for The Economist. They are the 1% of the 1% lemme tell ya.

And Trump ain't gonna build a wall. He's not going to kick the Muslims out or stop Muslim immigration. Congress has the purse strings so unless Trump wants to build the wall using his own money (which even he doesn't have nearly enough to pay for that) and the President doesn't make immigration law. He only says what he says to get votes, just like any other candidate making promises they know they can't keep.

Cruz's wife as you know works for Goldman Sachs. He also got a substantial loan from Goldman Sachs as well. The #1 campaign donor for Rubio is Goldman Sachs and as we all know Hillary been paid over $21 million since leaving the State department from investment banks with Goldman paying a nice chunk of that.

Goldman Sachs contributions to Trump? $0.

That's why the Republican establishment doesn't want Trump. It's why the Democrat establishment doesn't want Sanders. They ain't Sachs men.


I think I made the Goldman Sachs connection in the TRUMP not a Christian thread, but thank you for the follow up wasn't aware of Rubio, but yes on both Cruz and billary
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:29 am

jgordon1111 wrote:I think I made the Goldman Sachs connection in the TRUMP not a Christian thread, but thank you for the follow up wasn't aware of Rubio, but yes on both Cruz and billary


Goldman Sachs was giving the lion's share to Jeb until it became apparent Jeb wasn't gonna get it done. Between October through December Rubio received over $107,000 directly from Sachs and that's not counting what they put into PAC's supporting Rubio.
Also, a guy named Joseph Wall, who works for Goldman Sachs as a lobbyist, is a campaign bundler for the Rubio campaign.

With Jeb, Sachs gave his campaign $773,000 prior to the fourth quarter. In the last three months of 2015 Goldman Sachs had only donated a mere $2,950. You can see how Sachs shifted from Jeb to Rubio when it became clear that Jeb wasn't doing well.

Rubio is now the last best hope for the investment banks. Cruz is completely under control, after all his wife is basically a Goldman Sachs handler. And of course, Hillary, she's the highest paid of all the candidates from both parties. She's certainly a Sachs creature.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby jgordon1111 on Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:13 pm

patches70 wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:I think I made the Goldman Sachs connection in the TRUMP not a Christian thread, but thank you for the follow up wasn't aware of Rubio, but yes on both Cruz and billary


Goldman Sachs was giving the lion's share to Jeb until it became apparent Jeb wasn't gonna get it done. Between October through December Rubio received over $107,000 directly from Sachs and that's not counting what they put into PAC's supporting Rubio.
Also, a guy named Joseph Wall, who works for Goldman Sachs as a lobbyist, is a campaign bundler for the Rubio campaign.

With Jeb, Sachs gave his campaign $773,000 prior to the fourth quarter. In the last three months of 2015 Goldman Sachs had only donated a mere $2,950. You can see how Sachs shifted from Jeb to Rubio when it became clear that Jeb wasn't doing well.

Rubio is now the last best hope for the investment banks. Cruz is completely under control, after all his wife is basically a Goldman Sachs handler. And of course, Hillary, she's the highest paid of all the candidates from both parties. She's certainly a Sachs creature.


I see you did your homework on this one thanks for updating everyone. This is important for people to know
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Symmetry on Thu Mar 03, 2016 4:46 pm

What a shock that extreme right wingers would pick a bank called Goldman Sachs to name as shadowy puppet masters controlling the world. Only a blonde(ish), blue eyed ubermensch can defeat them, of course. When he can spare time from his plans to prevent foreign rapists attacking American women, and instituting constant monitoring of a religious minority that is.

History repeats itself.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users