Conspiracy in Iowa

[mrswdk]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

[Bernie Sanders]

[tzor]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

They used CC Coins. They work like the CC Defending Dice.

Besides, the Sanders should have objected to the rules, "Heads I win; tails you loose."

[DaGip]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

I-Ching?

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

They used CC Coins. They work like the CC Defending Dice.

Besides, the Sanders should have objected to the rules, "Heads I win; tails you loose."

I never lose, or loose, either. 'Cept maybe the hounds.

-TG

[iAmCaffeine]

(the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses)

Lolwat now?

[jimboston]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

[notyou2]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

Jim, are you really that dumb? Do you not know what your country does around the world? The influence it has? The interference it performs? Your government is a bully at the behest of the american people/big business who are also bullies. The election effects us all. We the peoples of the world have every right to discuss it. Too bad we couldn't influence it more.

[UCAbears]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

Jim, are you really that dumb? Do you not know what your country does around the world? The influence it has? The interference it performs? Your government is a bully at the behest of the american people/big business who are also bullies. The election effects us all. We the peoples of the world have every right to discuss it. Too bad we couldn't influence it more.

[jimboston]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

Jim, are you really that dumb? Do you not know what your country does around the world? The influence it has? The interference it performs? Your government is a bully at the behest of the american people/big business who are also bullies. The election effects us all. We the peoples of the world have every right to discuss it. Too bad we couldn't influence it more.

My point is simply that mrswdk is going against his/her own word.

Furthermore the Caucus is BS and has nothing to do with the election.

[mrswdk]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

Erm, yeah. What notyou2 said. Do you think that the consequences of the US election will only be felt within the US?

[Symmetry]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

Erm, yeah. What notyou2 said. Do you think that the consequences of the US election will only be felt within the US?

You are right, and Jim is correct in pointing out that you are being hypocritical. You were simply wrong before.

It's not tough- admit that you were wrong before, and the hypocrisy is gone. Maintain your previous statement and you hold a double standard.

Your choice.

[mrswdk]

Your comments have been received and will be reviewed with 3-5 working days.

[jimboston]

Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

Erm, yeah. What notyou2 said. Do you think that the consequences of the US election will only be felt within the US?

You are contradicting your prior statements.

Hypocrite.

[mrswdk]

Only if you consider this thread to be 'bashing the US'.