Conquer Club

GQ says no to Ted Cruz

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:04 pm

GQ magazine says Ted Cruz needs to rethink his clothing line.

http://www.gq.com/story/ted-cruz-leather-jacket-santa-photobomb

Was Ted Cruz picked on when he was a kid and stuffed in a locker? Is this why he wears flannel shirts and new and not washed blue jeans with ill fitting leather jacket to look tough?

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/23/ted-cruz-is-just-like-his-clothes-carefully-thought-out-ill-fitting-and-unlikable

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:14 pm

What's wrong with flannel?

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:31 pm

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:What's wrong with flannel?

-TG


Read the articles. Basically, he is wearing them to show, he ain't no nerd. You got to look like the fashion suites you or you become the Emperor without clothes.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:57 pm

Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:23 pm

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG


What's wrong with powdered wigs? I think Ted Cruz who constantly likes to quote our founding fathers, should wear one. It sure would look better on him than that 50s Joseph McCarthy hair style
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby notyou2 on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:30 pm

His clothes don't matter as he makes an ass of himself every time he opens his mouth.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:34 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG


What's wrong with powdered wigs? I think Ted Cruz who constantly likes to quote our founding fathers, should wear one. It sure would look better on him than that 50s Joseph McCarthy hair style


Touche.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby notyou2 on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:36 pm

Is it my imagination or are the Republican candidates extra douchie this time around?
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby riskllama on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:38 pm

that shirt is hideous.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:57 pm

notyou2 wrote:Is it my imagination or are the Republican candidates extra douchie this time around?


It's the Clown Bus for sure. It's like an incredibly absurd movie about the worst of the worst running for President. Each candidate trying to outdo the other with more crazy batshit talking points.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:00 am

riskllama wrote:that shirt is hideous.


Just wondering are those real buttons or the ones that snap on his shirt? The snaps are for nerds.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:15 am

I think it's only hideous because it's like three sizes too big. Cruz needs to work on his gains if he wants to wear xxxl shirts.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby saxitoxin on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:41 am

I don't know if it's just me, and I'm not saying this to be mean to Cruz, but does he look like a woman to anyone else? I've always thought he looks like a mid-op transsexual. I think it's a combination of the extremely high cheekbones, thin lips, and no jaw line (the way the fat has collected in a perfect sphere around the base of his head make his neck and head basically look like a single unit). He also has this very flush skin tone that makes him appear to be wearing make-up.

It's actually not very noticeable if he has a serious expression on his face. Then he looks almost completely male. But when he smiles it's like he suddenly changes sex.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13407
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby riskllama on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:41 am

they appear to be snaps, bernie.
:?
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Dukasaur on Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:20 am

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG

+1
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28137
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Symmetry on Tue Dec 29, 2015 5:31 am

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG


GQ is a men's style and fashion magazine dude. If they don't like his style, they ain't exactly betraying their raison d'etre.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Bernie Sanders on Tue Dec 29, 2015 9:16 am

Ted Cruz being born in Canada, doesn't that make him ineligible to become President of the United States? I know he renounced his Canadian citizenship recently.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby tzor on Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:40 am

riskllama wrote:that shirt is hideous.


That shirt screams "Republican Base." (Which may in fact be hideous, but it's that base that votes in the primaries and caucuses.)
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Tue Dec 29, 2015 3:19 pm

Symmetry wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG


GQ is a men's style and fashion magazine dude. If they don't like his style, they ain't exactly betraying their raison d'etre.


If they had kept it to the fashion, I would agree. But adding in their own political agenda, and the bits about how Cruz's old roommate and father means they wanted to talk about more than just his fashion sense.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby Symmetry on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:55 am

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Yeah, I read it. It seems like a petty excuse because they don't like Cruz (I don't like him either). It seems silly to me to insist that simply because one makes a lot of money or runs for office they must wear silks and powdered wigs at all times. It's flannel-- it's functional, long-lasting, durable, and warm. Apparently you can't wear it if you make >$100k a year.

It's a sad excuse for journalism.

Also, I've never associated flannel with "nerds."

-TG


GQ is a men's style and fashion magazine dude. If they don't like his style, they ain't exactly betraying their raison d'etre.


If they had kept it to the fashion, I would agree. But adding in their own political agenda, and the bits about how Cruz's old roommate and father means they wanted to talk about more than just his fashion sense.

-TG


The GQ article mentions neither of those, dude.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: GQ says no to Ted Cruz

Postby morleyjoe on Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:27 am

Ted Cruz could win...if he just went to this page:

viewtopic.php?f=90&t=216592
Image
show: My CC
User avatar
Captain morleyjoe
 
Posts: 1732
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Fenwick Ontario Canada


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users