Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
/ wrote:I honestly don't know if man walked on the moon. I'd personally call it more of a combination of hobbling and skipping.
jimboston wrote:More funny stuff...
http://whatstheharm.net/
http://whatstheharm.net/moonlandingdenial.html
The website shows "harm" caused by false beliefs.
It's not as ridiculous as some of these conspiracies... but it's close.
I LOVE the "harm" caused to Bart Sibrel because he denies the moon landing.
tzor wrote:One of the funniest jokes of the moon landing is that Americans never actually saw the video of the moon landing. They saw a video of the video of the moon landing. The lunar camera system was not compatible with the standard US TV signal and thus a camera had to be pointed to the video monitors. That's why it looked so crappy to most americans. People who would "fake" this wouldn't have faked it so poorly.
Metsfanmax wrote:Or maybe they intentionally would fake it so poorly, knowing that people would think they wouldn't fake it so poorly and thus concluding it was real.
Symmetry wrote:I've always liked that the tech didn't exist to fake the landings.
http://www.geek.com/news/why-it-was-impossible-to-fake-the-1969-moon-landing-1537386/
It would have been more difficult to fake the moon landings than to actually land on the moon given 1969 technology.
Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:I've always liked that the tech didn't exist to fake the landings.
http://www.geek.com/news/why-it-was-impossible-to-fake-the-1969-moon-landing-1537386/
It would have been more difficult to fake the moon landings than to actually land on the moon given 1969 technology.
Was it impossible to fake the photos and videos?
Bernie Sanders wrote:I think this thread has landed on the moon.
Symmetry wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:I think this thread has landed on the moon.
It takes about 1.5 seconds for a radio signal to reach the moon from earth. I suspect this thread got there a while ago.
Bernie Sanders wrote:I think this thread has landed on the moon.
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:I've always liked that the tech didn't exist to fake the landings.
http://www.geek.com/news/why-it-was-impossible-to-fake-the-1969-moon-landing-1537386/
It would have been more difficult to fake the moon landings than to actually land on the moon given 1969 technology.
Was it impossible to fake the photos and videos?
That's the gist of it, yes. At least the videos. The tech needed to fake them didn't exist at the time.
Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:I've always liked that the tech didn't exist to fake the landings.
http://www.geek.com/news/why-it-was-impossible-to-fake-the-1969-moon-landing-1537386/
It would have been more difficult to fake the moon landings than to actually land on the moon given 1969 technology.
Was it impossible to fake the photos and videos?
That's the gist of it, yes. At least the videos. The tech needed to fake them didn't exist at the time.
What was the specific technology that did not exist yet?
Phatscotty wrote:What was the specific technology that did not exist yet?
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap