Moderator: Community Team
luns101 wrote:Is this simply a money-making venture
jimboston wrote:It is a money-making venture.
(All major motion pictures are; including the original trilogy!)
Yes... it's a money grab.
It'll still be awesome!
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
luns101 wrote:jimboston wrote:It is a money-making venture.
(All major motion pictures are; including the original trilogy!)
Yes... it's a money grab.
It'll still be awesome!
Yeah, nobody intentionally funds a film to take a bath on profits (unless it's ISHTAR, maybe)
I guess what I was really wondering was opinions on whether they said to themselves, "hey, we can just about make the story go anywehere we want...they'll line up and pay whatever we want to charge". While I don't mind it being worse than the first (6) films, I really don't want it to outright suck. I'll never forget how angry I was after Phantom Menace.
luns101 wrote:not like the Rocky Balboa series which never actually ends
waauw wrote:I don't know why people dislike the Phantom menace, I like it. The again, the first time I watched that movie I was 10yo.
jimboston wrote:luns101 wrote:not like the Rocky Balboa series which never actually ends
Rocky V & Rocky Balboa I never saw.
The new "Rocky" movie... "Creed" has a chance to be good.
jimboston wrote:luns101 wrote:jimboston wrote:It is a money-making venture.
(All major motion pictures are; including the original trilogy!)
Yes... it's a money grab.
It'll still be awesome!
Yeah, nobody intentionally funds a film to take a bath on profits (unless it's ISHTAR, maybe)
I guess what I was really wondering was opinions on whether they said to themselves, "hey, we can just about make the story go anywehere we want...they'll line up and pay whatever we want to charge". While I don't mind it being worse than the first (6) films, I really don't want it to outright suck. I'll never forget how angry I was after Phantom Menace.
The people running the creative side of things are my age... 40's. They saw the first Star Wars when they were kids, and have a connection to it just like us Fans do.
Yeah, they are planning on milking the "Star Wars Universe" for every cent it's worth... but at the same time I think it's a rich universe and there are a lot of good stories they can tell. I bet the new Trilogy will be awesome. They also have a Bobba Fett movie possibly planned; and a "Red Squadron" movie. I think these will all be good. At some point... 5-7 years from now... it might be too watered down.
Not worried about it now though.
Phatscotty wrote:
Yup. All I'll say is Grand Admiral Thrawn n Jorus C'Boath
jimboston wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
Yup. All I'll say is Grand Admiral Thrawn n Jorus C'Boath
I read "Heir to the Empire" years ago, but I can't remember it.
I just glanced at the Wookieepedia entry for these two...
seems like a good story possibility, so long as it doesn't
conflict with the movie time lines.
waauw wrote:I don't know why people dislike the Phantom menace, I like it. Then again, the first time I watched that movie I was 10yo.
2dimes wrote:waauw wrote:I don't know why people dislike the Phantom menace, I like it. Then again, the first time I watched that movie I was 10yo.
I thought it was pretty good and my favorite Jedi is Qui-Gon Jinn. However, even though I know George wanted to make it fun and more friendly for kids.
(I appreciate that actually since I love watching the movies with mine.)
Jar jar did in fact make me angry too. I was shocked they could come up with something worse than Ewoks.
Then the attack of the clones worst love scene acting ever ruined the franchise so much for me I never bothered watching the final one he made until we bought the box set to watch with the kids. Now episode III is my current favorite bumping The Empire Strikes Back to second.
2dimes wrote:my favorite Jedi is Qui-Gon Jinn
2dimes wrote: worst love scene acting ever
2dimes wrote: Now episode III is my current favorite bumping The Empire Strikes Back to second.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Have you seen the remastered versions of the original trilogy?
Talk about CGI overload.
jimboston wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:Have you seen the remastered versions of the original trilogy?
Talk about CGI overload.
I can deal with some of the CGI.
The little creatures in the foreground... the Storm Troopers riding those lizard things.
Those were OK.
The whole scene with Jabba the Hutt is ridiculous.
I could buy the idea of him hanging by the Falcon, and letting Han go so he could earn the money he was owed. I can't buy the idea of Jabba letting Han get away with stepping on his 'tail'. I know the scene was filmed with a human actor and they didn't even know what a Hutt looked like at that point... so Han walked behind him. Still... a Badass Alien Ganster would not have allowed some smuggler to disrespect him like that. It's not realistic! (sic)
You know what I mean!
If they couldn't have worked it in some way, they should have left it out. It wasn't needed, and it makes Jabba look weak.
muy_thaiguy wrote:How about putting Hayden Christensen in at the end of Return of the Jedi instead of Sebastian Shaw (the guy who was under the helmet of Vader in Return of the Jedi)? When I had bought the remastered versions, I had not realized they did this until I got to that scene, and almost threw the remote control at the TV because of it.
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS