Moderator: Community Team
madmitch wrote:On day 1 if I remember right streakers scum pick was Dakky (right) TWR( wrong) and cyan ??? so your picks were pretty even . HELP me out buddy I really don,t want to lynch you I would rather go after the inactive players and I don;t like switching my votes it makes me look like a fool![]()
ptlowe wrote:madmitch wrote:IF I am wrong so be it but I don't think I am, let the other players lynch who they feel is scum and if you think you are going to get hung then you can always tell us who you are and we will take it from there.we could believe you and go back after cyan for his lack of posts.
Agree with Mitch 100%
Also, you seem to be getting about as defensive as Tim with very little pressure just me and mitch
ptlowe wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose are you the doublevoter? If not Cyan has just been lynched.
Congratulations guys, how about you actually ask questions next time. Lynching someone without attempting to gain evidence is the stupidest thing you can do.
I agree and who were the voters...
Pixar streaker tim ragain...
One of them is mafia
Streaker wrote:It's an interesting read, Day 1. I suggest everyone does the same.
Mitch, do you remember this one:madmitch wrote:@ WHITE ROSE I knew you were joking about the poem and that is why I posted what I did and did not really think you were scum until you jumped all over me and that was after I made the post about Dakky, you are very protective of Dakky he must be your scum mate so you won't like this VOTE DAKKY![]()
![]()
Tim was clearly struck by it:TimWoodbury wrote:madmitch wrote:@ WHITE ROSE I knew you were joking about the poem and that is why I posted what I did and did not really think you were scum until you jumped all over me and that was after I made the post about Dakky, you are very protective of Dakky he must be your scum mate so you won't like this VOTE DAKKY![]()
![]()
hmm mitch thi sounds ALOT like retaliation right here, rose votes you for defending IB then you instantly jump onto the dakky bandwagon and connect it with rose defending him
i would say this makes mitch looks even more suspicious
vote mitch
But now it get's interesting.
Tim fires this post at the start of D2:TimWoodbury wrote:so mitch soft claimed more or less out of nowhere for more or less no reason at all otehr then to put white rose over as a townie, i think lynch mitch and if he turns skum then lynch rose if its town then w go for streaker or we can do streaker today and if he turns town do mitch then rose
Mitch soft claims cop, and the first thing that Tim wants to do based on that claim is lynch the cop first, and then the target he cleared as town.
Unfortunately, as white rose was all over me at that time, I was focusing all my attention to that and I missed this gem of a post.
This post from Ragian (my biggest town read atm) also confirms the suspicion on Tim (and cyan) thus alligning our reads:Ragian wrote:
I think Tam's post is suspicious. Surely match is claiming cop as straeker points out. That he's a fool about it isn't indicative about his alignment. I've played with loads of players that are so keen on helping that they jump their respective guns. The suggestion that we lynch match in order to see if the whate ruse is scum is kind of a gamble at this stage. I'm keeping an eye on him.
However, I wanted this yesterday. Now, I want it more: Vote cyan Did nothing yesterday. I think he's a great candidate for a first claim of today. Tam would be my second choice.
FP'ed by straeker twice. STOP POSTING!
Vote Tim
Whatsausage wrote:madmitch wrote:On day 1 if I remember right streakers scum pick was Dakky (right) TWR( wrong) and cyan ??? so your picks were pretty even . HELP me out buddy I really don,t want to lynch you I would rather go after the inactive players and I don;t like switching my votes it makes me look like a fool![]()
In my opinion, it looks more foolish to stick with a vote you are no longer convicted in. If you really don't want to lynch him, change your vote. If you think we should lynch an inactive, build as much of a case as exists on an inactive and then try to get others to vote with you. I for one could be talked into switching to cyan. If Tim was more interested in defending himself, I'd say cyan would be the best target in that he posts occasionally as to avoid being replaced, but he hasn't really said a thing about the game. Also, as ragian said, we should not decide who you investigate and announce it because of how many ways it could be messed with then. In fact I think it looks good on streaker for saying this, and poor on pt and pixar for advocating it. Although pt, why just 90% on streaker? Who is your other 10%?
@pix, he wouldn't have to mafia cop, as scum would know who is and isn't scum without investigation (unless multiple factions, which appears unlikely)ptlowe wrote:madmitch wrote:IF I am wrong so be it but I don't think I am, let the other players lynch who they feel is scum and if you think you are going to get hung then you can always tell us who you are and we will take it from there.we could believe you and go back after cyan for his lack of posts.
Agree with Mitch 100%
Also, you seem to be getting about as defensive as Tim with very little pressure just me and mitch
How can you agree with mitch 100% and then accuse streaker of being defensive when mitch's post is basically telling him to claim? There is defending yourself when the focus comes on you, and then there is what Tim did: claiming with minimal pressure and basically giving up. In my opinion, streaker's method of defense is much more town than Tim's. It seems that some people are focusing on claims way too much, they should used as only a last resort of defense, otherwise why not just have a massclaim straightaway?It appears that scum were given fakeclaims, and even with dakky's stumbling, they could have been given roles to go along with the names, so making even a reasonable claim should not be insta-town. This is part of the reason I think Tim is scum, you need to focus on reads. A claimed vanilla town that plays like scum is probably scum.
Also, I feel the need to say this as I see a lot of "if player X flips town, then player Y must be scum". This works to some extent in one direction in that two scum will likely not have a large dispute where it mostly becomes one or the other is the lynch. However, town have no way of knowing who is and isn't scum, so it could easily happen that a town pushed another town really hard. Just keep that in mind after we get some flips.ptlowe wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:White Rose are you the doublevoter? If not Cyan has just been lynched.
Congratulations guys, how about you actually ask questions next time. Lynching someone without attempting to gain evidence is the stupidest thing you can do.
I agree and who were the voters...
Pixar streaker tim ragain...
One of them is mafia
Well, we better lynch them all to get that scum!
the white rose wrote:then you had better unvote wing, just in case.
it looks like tim is going to be lynched, i may be night killed, but remember please if and when tim flips town who led this claim and make sure town is not is not fooled again tomorrow.
mitch go ahead and choose your own person to investigate, hope to see you survive the night, but if you are really cop i would doubt it.
its a shame i cannot persuade any of you to lynch streaker or wing, i am just a crap salesman i guess
" and then object to Streaker pushing TWR. That doesnt stack up to me.PTLowe wrote:If I had posted yesterday, I would have been pretty hard on trying to lynch TWR
madmitch wrote:the hell with it I keeping my hands clean until we hear fro m cyan and kratos, sorry I can;t take the risk of killing TIM UNVOTE
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:@Streaker - Claiming there are too many inactives is a fallacy. Only Cyan and Kratos have insufficient posts to read currently.
@Madmitch - Listen to Rage. Do not claim your cop check target. Even if you dont hit mafia with your investigate, a town result is still useful information to have. This is your strongest game by a long way, so keep it up.
@Rose - I have no qualms if Tim is hammered. I only want to make it clear that to do so is denying us the opportunity for further discussion without Kratos having posted properly D2 and three more days to go till deadline. If anyone decides to hammer they need to carefully consider why they are doing so. So no I will not unvote.
I have had this feeling that Streaker has been mirroring my actions in game. He has done this to me before and it completely blindsides my read on him.
@Ptlowe - I dont get how you can say, "" and then object to Streaker pushing TWR. That doesnt stack up to me.PTLowe wrote:If I had posted yesterday, I would have been pretty hard on trying to lynch TWR
ptlowe wrote:the white rose wrote:then you had better unvote wing, just in case.
it looks like tim is going to be lynched, i may be night killed, but remember please if and when tim flips town who led this claim and make sure town is not is not fooled again tomorrow.
mitch go ahead and choose your own person to investigate, hope to see you survive the night, but if you are really cop i would doubt it.
its a shame i cannot persuade any of you to lynch streaker or wing, i am just a crap salesman i guess
Streaker is scum plain and simple. Ill post more tonight on it. Pixar big bandwagon player not liking the play there either.
TimWoodbury wrote:did you already forget metsfan was mafia cop and pix was mafia doc in one of the recent games
the white rose wrote:oh wait, endgame has the vc wrong, madmitch is not on streaker, you gonna join us mitch?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users