Moderator: Community Team
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			aage wrote:madmitch wrote:Speculating about the roles is kind of pointless at the moment. If there is a cop, he is a sane cop. If there is a doc, he is a sane cop. (Unless Mitch is one of them of course.)
Tim, you are slightly suspicious there.
Aage your statement about Tim is highly suspicious almost to the point of being scummy,are you trying to get the light off you?
Explain yourself.
 ptlowe
				ptlowe
			






















 
			

 madmitch
				madmitch
			

















 
		madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim

 aage
				aage
			


 
		 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			 ptlowe
				ptlowe
			






















 
			 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			 bosaardbeitje
				bosaardbeitje
			 
		 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			

 madmitch
				madmitch
			

















 
		bosaardbeitje wrote:I agree with Subtle, Mitch's accusation of Aage is not well-founded.
And why is Mitch aaaaaaaaaaaall of a sudden questioning Aage's jokevote? It was quite obvious Aage was only voting for Mitch, because Mitch was practically asking for a vote...
 ptlowe
				ptlowe
			






















 
			aage wrote:madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim
Why is it "highly suspicious" that I think Tim is slightly suspicious? His posts heavily indicate he does not have a power role. I'm asking you to explain yourself because your point of "getting the light off me" is bullshit, there was no light on me.
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this

 Epitaph1
				Epitaph1
			


















 
		 bosaardbeitje
				bosaardbeitje
			 
		bosaardbeitje wrote:We really need to hear from wcwnww and rizky... We cannot start a proper analysis as long as they don't post in here.
 My suspicions of Tim were mostly fueled by this post of his. I admit it's not the strongest of arguments, but it's day one and seemed good enough for me to comment on.
 My suspicions of Tim were mostly fueled by this post of his. I admit it's not the strongest of arguments, but it's day one and seemed good enough for me to comment on.
 aage
				aage
			


 
		 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			
 bosaardbeitje
				bosaardbeitje
			 
		

 madmitch
				madmitch
			

















 
		
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			Streaker wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:I'm glad the cops are sane.
seems odd how do you KNOW cop is sane?? vote epi for assumeing things already bad bad epi
This is why Mods ask players to colour, and bold their votes. Votes are easily missed, and I tend to miss easy.
Please use this format:
Vote Streaker, or any variant but colour and bold is required.
I edited the vote count.
Thank you for your understanding.
 TimWoodbury
				TimWoodbury
			


















 
		TimWoodbury wrote:Streaker wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:I'm glad the cops are sane.
seems odd how do you KNOW cop is sane?? vote epi for assumeing things already bad bad epi
This is why Mods ask players to colour, and bold their votes. Votes are easily missed, and I tend to miss easy.
Please use this format:
Vote Streaker, or any variant but colour and bold is required.
I edited the vote count.
Thank you for your understanding.
that is my bad i had thought i had clicked the red and bold actually looking at it it has the color and B tag so not shure why it didnt bold.
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			aage wrote:madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim
Why is it "highly suspicious" that I think Tim is slightly suspicious? His posts heavily indicate he does not have a power role. I'm asking you to explain yourself because your point of "getting the light off me" is bullshit, there was no light on me.
 TimWoodbury
				TimWoodbury
			


















 
		Epitaph1 wrote:
Btw Tim, was your vote on me a joke or serious? I remember thinking it was a joke when it first happened, but after a re-read it looked serious.
 TimWoodbury
				TimWoodbury
			


















 
		 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			subtleknifewield wrote:True, it is a very learning experience
So I think I see where Epi is coming from when he talks about Tim as well, on top of my suspicions over Mitch. I would be ok with pressuring either now and seeing if anything turns up.
 TimWoodbury
				TimWoodbury
			


















 
		TimWoodbury wrote:subtleknifewield wrote:True, it is a very learning experience
So I think I see where Epi is coming from when he talks about Tim as well, on top of my suspicions over Mitch. I would be ok with pressuring either now and seeing if anything turns up.
im curious are you seeing it and interested in pressureing either of us ecause you dont care who gets lynched as long as its not you?? hmmm always ways to be interperted differant. im gonna do dishes(just got hoem from work so checking in on games and such now before hores) and then reread the thread and i can post some more then about currently potential reads.
@aage are you deflecting onto me by answereing mitches question with a question about me? possable skumy though cant say uur skummy jsut or that gotta look more at it
@subtleknife nope didnt claim anything im just saying that there can be a et up with only VT's set up with 1 or 2 power roles so him saying that because i hinted at being non PR dont mean im skum
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			Users browsing this forum: No registered users