[Official] Choose Your Own Mafia - TOWN WINS

by **Epitaph1** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:28 pm

Let the record show that Wing thinks I am the scummiest player in this game.

by **WingCmdr Ginkapo** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:30 pm

Epitaph1 wrote:Let the record show that Wing thinks I am the scummiest player in this game.

No shit. The record has me voting for you.

This isnt your first game Dorothy.

by **benga** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:58 pm

Marashu wrote:
ptlowe wrote:9.virus90 (8,9) Should be kicked for inactivity

He has not yet replied to my prod. I am giving him until tomorrow morning - if there is no reply, I will be replacing him, and giving an extension.

how big of extension?

why just not kick him?

will read once again some of the post, to see if I overlooked something and than come back with either unvoting pt or not

by **Marashu** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:07 pm

benga wrote:how big of extension?

why just not kick him?

1) Depends on how long it takes to find a replacement, but likely 24-48 hours, so that not only can they catch up over the weekend, but there will be enough time for some discussion with the replacement.

2) Because I sent the prod this morning, and believe in giving a full day after a prod.

by **HotShot53** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:09 pm

Mod, just to be sure, if there is no majority by the deadline, is there a no-lynch or is there a plurality lynch? I just looked at the rules, and don't see it mentioned either way.

by **Marashu** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:11 pm

HotShot53 wrote:Mod, just to be sure, if there is no majority by the deadline, is there a no-lynch or is there a plurality lynch? I just looked at the rules, and don't see it mentioned either way.

I will update that in the OP. Lack of majority will result in a no-lynch.

by **madmitch** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:28 pm

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Thats sarcasm before Mitch votes me

by **HotShot53** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:36 pm

Marashu wrote:
HotShot53 wrote:Mod, just to be sure, if there is no majority by the deadline, is there a no-lynch or is there a plurality lynch? I just looked at the rules, and don't see it mentioned either way.

I will update that in the OP. Lack of majority will result in a no-lynch.

Ok, everyone was assuming that, but figured it was best to make sure that's how you intended it.

I know I haven't been participating as much as I probably should be; between being busy at work with deadlines coming up and all the extra games from the cc olympics I don't have the time to look at everyone as in-depth as I'd like to. And other than the points I made when voting wing, I haven't really seen anything that jumped out at me... I can see both sides of most of the cases. After night 1 when a lot of people will flip, we'll have a lot better idea on the ones who are left.

As to who I'd vote to lynch other than wing... right now I don't see any of the cases as strong enough to lynch someone off of really, and no-one has been pressured enough to even get close to L-2 (although somehow we have 3 claims anyway lol). Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

by **Army of GOD** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:42 pm

HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

...

by **madmitch** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:58 pm

Epitaph1 wrote:Mitch, who are you willing to lynch right now.

Me and who else?

Still you but benga's push for night has me wondering about him and why the big rush .unless he has gifts or works better at night .possible scum there #-o

by **HotShot53** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 5:53 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

...

Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.

by **madmitch** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:09 pm

HotShot53 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

...

Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.

well thank you, but by saying that you probably put a target on yourself,I hope not [-o<

by **Endgame422** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:14 pm

Hmm of the wagons we have right now(PT,AoG,epi,mitch),ill Unvote Vote AoG
He is being very defensive right now and has seemed ok to go in any direction.
Kind of a "lynch anyone but me" attitude,admitedly he could just be town who dgaf but hes my top choice of the wagons listed,followed by epi,then mitch and PT last.
Ill switch if need be.

by **Metsfanmax** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:15 pm

I feel the need to vouch for AOG. As he says, this playstyle really isn't unusual for him. He strikes me as much more town-aligned this game than he has in other games, if anything.

by **Army of GOD** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:16 pm

HotShot53 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

...

Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.

Haha I know, I'm kidding. I have a naturally scummy play style

Which is not good...

by **Army of GOD** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:21 pm

So what, that's 3 on me, 3 on Epi and 4 on ptlowe?

Plus a double voter may be out there.

by **Endgame422** on Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:I feel the need to vouch for AOG. As he says, this playstyle really isn't unusual for him. He strikes me as much more town-aligned this game than he has in other games, if anything.

I severly doubt that mets would say this unless it was his honest opinion and he was town. He knows if AoG flips scum at any point this post will be a pretty big strike against him,and i dont think he would even chance it if he were scum.
Hotshot may as well be advocating a nolynch with this post

HotShot53 wrote:As to who I'd vote to lynch other than wing... right now I don't see any of the cases as strong enough to lynch someone off of really, and no-one has been pressured enough to even get close to L-2 (although somehow we have 3 claims anyway lol). Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.

Especially since he asked about the no lynch rule,then here he says noone is a strong enough case to lynch,which kinda implies that we ought to go no lynch.I still think HS is scum,but its going to have to wait for tomorrow unless we get the extension.

by **benga** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 2:18 am

madmitch wrote:
Epitaph1 wrote:Mitch, who are you willing to lynch right now.

Me and who else?

Still you but benga's push for night has me wondering about him and why the big rush .unless he has gifts or works better at night .possible scum there

lol mitch, you really are mad
is there anybody who isn't scum to you?

by **WingCmdr Ginkapo** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:03 am

HotShot53 wrote:Honestly, what scum would suggest no-lynching day 1? A newbie, maybe... but anyone who is experienced knows that the words "No-lynch" are almost immediately followed up by "lynch him!" I wondered how long it would take someone to jump on the easy case of "lynch anyone who mentions no-lynch", and it looks like you took the bait. To me, that's a negative for you.

So Hotshot, how experienced are you?

by **Marashu** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:15 am

virus90 has been replaced by subtleknifewield. D1 will be extended to Tuesday, Sept 29, 1600CCT.

DAILY VOTE COUNT

ptlowe: AoG, Streaker, Pixar, benga
virus: Tim
Wing: HotShot
Epi: Wing, Mets, madmitch
madmitch: dakky, Epi
AoG: Sausage, ptlowe, Endgame

Not voting:subtleknifewield

Deadline is 1600CCT, Sept 29. With 15 alive, it takes 8 votes to lynch.

by **madmitch** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:59 am

@ skw , welcome to the mad house $\:D/$

by ***Pixar*** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:22 am

so all of us not being on the same page is suggesting a no lynch Day1, that will give scum a huge advantage, is anyone willing to switch their vote to another member who has 3+ votes on them who you think is scum. So we can at least get a claim out of someone besides pt's rushed claim

by **Epitaph1** on Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:39 am

*Pixar* wrote:so all of us not being on the same page is suggesting a no lynch Day1, that will give scum a huge advantage, is anyone willing to switch their vote to another member who has 3+ votes on them who you think is scum. So we can at least get a claim out of someone besides pt's rushed claim

That's what I've been trying to determine by asking everyone for their lists, but not enough people are cooperating. I tried.

unvote Vote AoG

Of the wagons (pt, me, mitch, and AoG), I'm willing to do mitch or AoG. Not enough people are interested in mitch, so I'll go with AoG.

I haven't played with AoG enough to comment on his style. Last time we played, I was the scum, so that isn't a good reference for his scum play lol.

---

Interested to hear subtle's take on everything.