HotShot53 wrote:12.Metsfanmax - Got into a big fight with storr day 1, from which storr town reads him. Voted streaker because he wanted to just go along with whomever storr wanted to lynch (sheeping),
A moment's reflection should point out how obviously wrong this is. The entire basis of my play up to that point was that Storr was scum, and that we were likely to hit town. I said that I wanted Storr's target to get lynched precisely because I expected that Storr's target would flip
town, bolstering my point that Storr was scum so that we could lynch him on D2.
then after the claim unvoted and gave reasons he believe the claim, even though wing stated definitively that it was a fake claim.
Storr answered this point sufficiently. I am not an idiot. The
last thing I would do as scum there is to draw attention to myself by unvoting when I had already switched on to Storr's case and said I wanted Storr's pick to be lynched. Streaker was clearly going to die at that point unless something miraculous happened, so what did it gain me?
Makes the statement that we are going to lynch storr or marashu today, anything else is wasting time. Although on day 1, he said "Also, lol at your argument against lone voters. That's a great attitude: never start a case against someone new, just sheep on what other people are doing."
Yes, and I acknowledged that there might be a seeming contradiction between the two stances. I don't think there was in context, because I was actually going hard against Storr and making a serious, game-long case out of it; most of the other people today have made half-hearted votes and not defended them further even as the day evolved. But even if I did change my stance when the circumstances changed (something I try not to do), that's not alignment indicative; it doesn't take being scum to want to be right.
When I gave him a FOS for the statement, he defends himself by stating "basically no one is doubting my town affiliation at this point in the game", doing what he didn't like storr doing of stating he's confirmed town basically.
I don't like saying someone is confirmed town when the "confirmation" is themselves saying it a lot based on disputed circumstances. I have been exonerated as town by multiple players (implicitly or explicitly) this game, without any real dispute about those circumstances, and you are one of the only people who is doubting it at this time. So the point here is that you'd better have a good reason to go after me.
Switches his vote back to marashu by quoting marashu's giving his win condition.
I obviously intended not to say why I am voting based on that, but since you are saying that your win condition is consistent with his, I will not say that it is not consistent with mine. (Maybe you are both scum?)
