Moderator: Community Team
got tonkaed wrote:There was a mass claim. I believe it could be either based on my bolded statement.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Mtam please claim who you disarmed N1 and N4. Your information could catch someone in a lie about being a vt or a power role. This is why I want you to say the actions for those nights.
Charm I think is town. Storr is what he claims or he would have known I didnt have a vote when he tried to hammer Tal yesterday. Mudpuppy is town. I dont like a lot about GT's play. I dont like how he put Mitch back at L-2 this early in the game. However the VT claim makes sense with a lot of what he has said and done (skill lynch actions and uncertainty with how spells relate to actions). Streaker has brought up the flavor of Sectum Sempra two or three times in his argument against Mudpuppy than denies that his argument has anything to do with flavor. Ignores that I brought up how Mudpuppy did not contradict himself.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
got tonkaed wrote:It isn't that hard.
Let's say for instance you are lying or have a safe claim with Harry. It would seemingly work because no one has done any action on you that is alignment indicative.
You are pushing Dazza. If dazza isn't lying and Mudpuppy is not scum, then his investigative ability goes down the drain. Mudpuppy is cleared but who cares right?
If you are scum and there is a wagon on any one of your scum partners right now (mitch? maybe the mod just crushed us with power safe claims) then you divide the vote.
Since you tend to reply in short responses and drag out any kind of communication, the wagons split and we end up rebooting near the deadline, lynch either dazza or a nobody and the scum win another day.
Or you could be town and you could just do the thing that people are asking you to do and hopefully provide clarity.
Strike - if scum were coming in to hammer it would have happened by now.
strike wolf wrote:You know Ive been debating for a while whether to black list you from my games. You throw tantrums, you actively antagonize everyone for little to no reason instead of explain your reads and half the timw you dont read the threadsn. Thank you for giving me the final reason I needed to black list you from any future game I host.
Ive explained why I think Charm and Mud are likely town and you taking their wands has nothing to do with it. Now answer the question about who you disarmed N1 and N4. If you have some legitimate reason for witholding this information explain it.
mtamburini wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Why don't you just do it? Everyone else has. It is like you are literally trying to pull votes to yourself for being obstinate.
Do you think me not claiming is more scum or town indicative based on your bolded statement?
My claim brings no new information to the table nor does it confirm anyones allignemnt
strike wolf wrote:You know Ive been debating for a while whether to black list you from my games. You throw tantrums, you actively antagonize everyone for little to no reason instead of explain your reads and half the timw you dont read the threadsn. Thank you for giving me the final reason I needed to black list you from any future game I host.
Ive explained why I think Charm and Mud are likely town and you taking their wands has nothing to do with it. Now answer the question about who you disarmed N1 and N4. If you have some legitimate reason for witholding this information explain it.
StorrZerg wrote:mtamburini wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Why don't you just do it? Everyone else has. It is like you are literally trying to pull votes to yourself for being obstinate.
Do you think me not claiming is more scum or town indicative based on your bolded statement?
My claim brings no new information to the table nor does it confirm anyones allignemnt
Neither, it's disruptive.
got tonkaed wrote:It is hard to know how much you are reading the thread to spot the liars. I don't hold it against you, you were gone and probably missed 20-30 pages of content.
The problem is if you are disarming that is not necessarily alignment indicative either. It works with the theme that it would be HP, but again if we got crushed by the mod with power safe claims then stuff happens i guess.
we could always lynch dudley
mtamburini wrote:StorrZerg wrote:mtamburini wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Why don't you just do it? Everyone else has. It is like you are literally trying to pull votes to yourself for being obstinate.
Do you think me not claiming is more scum or town indicative based on your bolded statement?
My claim brings no new information to the table nor does it confirm anyones allignemnt
Neither, it's disruptive.
Youre not allowed to talk to me
got tonkaed wrote:lol.
So much for shaking it off.
StorrZerg wrote:mtamburini wrote:StorrZerg wrote:mtamburini wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Why don't you just do it? Everyone else has. It is like you are literally trying to pull votes to yourself for being obstinate.
Do you think me not claiming is more scum or town indicative based on your bolded statement?
My claim brings no new information to the table nor does it confirm anyones allignemnt
Neither, it's disruptive.
Youre not allowed to talk to me
What you gonna do, disarm me again lol
MudPuppy wrote:aage wrote:MudPuppy wrote:aage wrote:Being able to stop a vigi shot but not the mafia night kill is very unlikely tbh.
So, your logic is that only town can use a killing spell? That's like saying only a vig can have a gun in a standard game.![]()
You continue your sketchiness. I can't prove anything but you are scum in my book.
No, that's not what I said. Town using a killing power is fine, that's what vigs are for. Doctors are normally able to stop any kill power from killing their target, regardless of whether it's a vigilante shot or a mafia night kill.
My logic is that a protective role protects the town from mafia. You claimed a role that protects the target against a vig kill, but not against the mafia kill. First of all, what is the point of blocking a vig kill? Second of all, what would be the point of your role if you can't block the mafia kill? That is why it is unlikely and that is why it is suspect.
That is exactly what you said... and just reconfirmed. You are concluding that because town was caught with a gun (sectumsempra) and scum hasn't that no scum could have that particular model of gun.
I have not claimed a role that fails to protect against a mafia kill... you've failed to acknowledge (or more likely chosen to ignore) the likelihood that mafia could be skilled in the use of this particular killing spell.
I've suspected you since you lied about your reasons for voting Storr on D1 and your scummy play continues: Vote aage
mtamburini wrote:9. Endgame422
10. Streaker
16. dazza2008
17. MudPuppy
22. dd515087
24. charm
These are the people I would lynch today, streaker being more at the end of the list.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users