Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
mtamburini wrote:I don't think he's lying.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:mtamburini wrote:I don't think he's lying.
Im giving him some benefit of the doubt with a doc claim but theres still a lot of inconsistency that has to be accounted for. If nothing else I want to develop some read on how Pixar thinks as a player.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Also on second thought, dega probably should claim who he visited. Theres little point in forcing claims if we believe the questionable name/role claims without testing their ability for accuracy.
strike wolf wrote:
unvote Vote Skill as the one of two with more of a case already on him.
degaston wrote:strike wolf wrote:Also on second thought, dega probably should claim who he visited. Theres little point in forcing claims if we believe the questionable name/role claims without testing their ability for accuracy.
My inclination is to not reveal it until after the person has claimed, but if I did, would you want a claim from that person right away, or not?
Do people think I should reveal it before the end of the day, in case I'm killed at night?
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:strike wolf wrote:
unvote Vote Skill as the one of two with more of a case already on him.
The case is that he is the most inactive. I'm not going to defend him, buts thats a shoddy case to just throw yourself onto.
degaston wrote:Do people think I should reveal it before the end of the day, in case I'm killed at night?
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:degaston wrote:strike wolf wrote:Also on second thought, dega probably should claim who he visited. Theres little point in forcing claims if we believe the questionable name/role claims without testing their ability for accuracy.
My inclination is to not reveal it until after the person has claimed, but if I did, would you want a claim from that person right away, or not?
Do people think I should reveal it before the end of the day, in case I'm killed at night?
I'd be surprised if you died tonight. At the moment that would stop you telling us who is wandless. Not a particularly strong piece of information. You need to tell us all your investigations prior to your death. If you ever feel threatened from lynch or nightkill you must reveal all.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:skillfusniper33 wrote:This really pisses me off right here, just like almost every other post you have made it is pretty useless, and contradicts yourself with you next post... Another waste of time and space that my computer has to load..
So you want to be lynched?
dd515087 wrote:*Pixar* wrote:I would also like to state that I will be keeping my vote on mtam for the reason that I don't believe a claim so highly.
Got Tonkaed if I counted right is at 105 posts
fped
Okay... Well in that case unvote, vote Pixar
Sniper is still mafia in my mind though
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
dd515087 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:strike wolf wrote:
unvote Vote Skill as the one of two with more of a case already on him.
The case is that he is the most inactive. I'm not going to defend him, buts thats a shoddy case to just throw yourself onto.
He's been inactive and when he does post they don't add much.
So, unvote, vote skill
Are we going to keep bandwagoning on everyone until they claim and then start a new one? I think it's likely that mafia were given fake claims.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'm in favour of Deg keeping in mind what his opinion is of those giving him advice.dd515087 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:strike wolf wrote:
unvote Vote Skill as the one of two with more of a case already on him.
The case is that he is the most inactive. I'm not going to defend him, buts thats a shoddy case to just throw yourself onto.
He's been inactive and when he does post they don't add much.
So, unvote, vote skill
Are we going to keep bandwagoning on everyone until they claim and then start a new one? I think it's likely that mafia were given fake claims.
Apparently we are going to keep going till everyone has claimed, mafia have fakeclaimed, and they can then go through the list cherry picking the most dangerous town roles to nightkill. Its genius.
I believe Pixar and would rather lynch Sniper as if he is Town he is basically useless. I just dont like the way this game is going with pushes for claims on the most tiny of reasons. I'm also unhappy that my case against Mets is apparently not stronger than "he's inactive". Its seems we have enough Mafia who are happy to push for claims against everyone they know to be mafia as there are enough town roles also happily jumping onto any bandwagon going with no case.
Do you have a better suggestion? We seem to be very good at targeting major roles (though a couple of them have outed themselves needlessly) We've been going at it for over a week on D2 without getting anything solid on anyone. And when someone does do something very suspicious, people who know them go all meta and say that they're always that way, nothing to see here - move along.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Are we going to keep bandwagoning on everyone until they claim and then start a new one? I think it's likely that mafia were given fake claims.
Again, do you have a better suggestion? Did the mafia get all the best roles as fake claims, or have we just been unlucky in targeting major roles?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Apparently we are going to keep going till everyone has claimed, mafia have fakeclaimed, and they can then go through the list cherry picking the most dangerous town roles to nightkill. Its genius.
There's always Storr - at least we know that he's not town.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I believe Pixar and would rather lynch Sniper as if he is Town he is basically useless.
I think the way mets tried to deflect the question of why he changed his opinion on pixar by trying to turn it into a semantics battle was pretty scummy. I haven't forgotten about it, but if pixar is really Hermione, then my only case against mets is that he could be scum trying to distance himself from a town lynch. I still want pixar to answer the questions about why he protected and voted for mtam, and wondered why he hadn't been targeted.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I just dont like the way this game is going with pushes for claims on the most tiny of reasons. I'm also unhappy that my case against Mets is apparently not stronger than "he's inactive".
Did you mean mafia pushing for claims against townies? It seems pretty difficult to build a strong case against anyone at this point. I guess my hope is that if we can get lucky and lynch scum by accident, or ID them through night powers, then we may be able to link them to others before they take over.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Its seems we have enough Mafia who are happy to push for claims against everyone they know to be mafia as there are enough town roles also happily jumping onto any bandwagon going with no case.
degaston wrote:Do you have a better suggestion? We seem to be very good at targeting major roles (though a couple of them have outed themselves needlessly) We've been going at it for over a week on D2 without getting anything solid on anyone. And when someone does do something very suspicious, people who know them go all meta and say that they're always that way, nothing to see here - move along.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Are we going to keep bandwagoning on everyone until they claim and then start a new one? I think it's likely that mafia were given fake claims.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users