Singles players I can see you

by **reverend_kyle** on Wed May 30, 2007 2:25 am

..you are the ones with the scores over 2000 and w/l %s of 40 and below.

by **panicker** on Wed May 30, 2007 2:31 am

reverend_kyle wrote:..you are the ones with the scores over 2000 and w/l %s of 40 and below.

makes me proud of my 38% record now lol least i can say i play mostly singles

by **Genghis Khan CA** on Wed May 30, 2007 2:38 am

My winning percentage is annoying, because i play about 50:50 singles and teams... so my doubles percentage is 76% and my singles percentage is 41%, resulting in a totally meaningless overall percentage of 57%!

Even just a singles percentage is meaningless because I have a 33% winning percentage in 6 player games, but because I played quite a few 3, 4 and 5 player games when I was starting my overall singles win rate is higher.

I suppose it is interesting anyway, not sure it tells you a lot until it is split up into different game types, but interesting nonetheless!

by **reverend_kyle** on Wed May 30, 2007 2:50 am

tanar pmed me to tell me he threw this off being a singles only player with a 52% w/l.

by **Xyl** on Wed May 30, 2007 3:28 am

reverend_kyle wrote:tanar pmed me to tell me he threw this off being a singles only player with a 52% w/l.

One doubles game, 20 singles games, w/l 57% - do I get a cookie?

by **gibbom** on Wed May 30, 2007 4:17 am

Genghis Khan CA wrote:My winning percentage is annoying, because i play about 50:50 singles and teams... so my doubles percentage is 76% and my singles percentage is 41%, resulting in a totally meaningless overall percentage of 57%!

Even just a singles percentage is meaningless because I have a 33% winning percentage in 6 player games, but because I played quite a few 3, 4 and 5 player games when I was starting my overall singles win rate is higher.

I suppose it is interesting anyway, not sure it tells you a lot until it is split up into different game types, but interesting nonetheless!

Looking forward to the rise of specialist 1v1 players - that'll really screw up the percentages!

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Wed May 30, 2007 4:34 am

panicker wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:..you are the ones with the scores over 2000 and w/l %s of 40 and below.

makes me proud of my 38% record now lol least i can say i play mostly singles

im sorry to hear that. you should try some team games. thats what the leet players play.

by **AAFitz** on Wed May 30, 2007 5:03 am

my percentage doesnt mean a hell of a lot either...i play every type but assassin, but I was not happy to see the seargent next to my name, I promise you that...im not sure I have the drive to work to become a captain again...

by **nagerous** on Wed May 30, 2007 5:06 am

72 Completed, 32 (44%) Won only ever won 2 team games

by **abel** on Wed May 30, 2007 10:27 am

You're right. I suck. 38% with a score of 2042 mostly in singles games. I'm not sure how you separate out the % for team games, but it's even lower for me. I've only won one team game. (Thanks reptile).

Any time I need to feel humble I can just look at the scoreboard. Someone tied with me has 55% wins :oops: