virus90 wrote:why would you vote hotshot for that mtam? its a bit of saying the obvious (by hotshot), but its not like thats a bad thing in this case in my opinion. better get people on board who maybe arent.
wouldnt say hotshot is cleared cause of 1 post, but i surely wouldnt go for him as my first serious hunch as for now.
Not committal but not surprising at this point in the game. Would have been more surprising if he did commit to an opinion. Was not the first person to say this. Overall read of post: Neutral.
2.
virus90 wrote:i think charm already did her little soft claim / hint. and i guess she wouldnt claim scum @ IB.
just like yesterday, i still dont get what was scummy about the Hotshot post. But that definatly escelated, which is good for activity and discussion i guess.
So charm how serious is your vote on storr?
unvote (my jokevote)
Asks a couple questions. Not anything super scummy but still hasn't committed to anything beyond "I still don't get what was scummy about the Hotshot post".
3.
virus90 wrote:as to mtam, it takes me an average of 27 min aswell to post, i know you just type some quick stuff (no offense to content just related to style), but dont think you can blame others for having a different posting style.
the whole crasp fight /argument is very distracting in my opinion. who is genuine, is it anywhere close to game related? in my opinion its mostly filler of which i dont have a clue what to do with it.
anyway, for my scummiest reads i go with legionnaire. not based on to much but i dont particularly like how he first votes IB, and then soon unvotes again and then never mentions anything about a next possible target. enough for me to vote him now, cause in my opinion he is waiting for something to happen and go with it or just wait as a goal itself.
vote legionnaire
Third post after being prompted about his activity from Mets.
First, easy comment on the 27 minute argument.
Second, easy answer about Crasp argument drawing no conclusions on the issue.
Third, comments on Legionaire...Meh logic that could also be applied to him at this point in the game as he has yet to do much to advance the game or follow through with earlier questions.
Ends with being the third vote on Legionaire. Possible bandwagon vote.
4.
virus90 wrote:i still prefer to lynch legionaire, but not sure if we can get a majority for that. as it seems currently its not very likely. since charm basicly claimed VT, it wouldnt be worse case if she gets lynched.
anyhow i prefer a lynch to gather information. since im sleeping when the deadline approaches i hope someone will switch votes to make sure a lynch happens. or ill have to do that myself in about 2 hours.
can Strike be PM'ed/poked ? i think im officaly not allowed to do that myself.
Easy post. Doesn't reapply any of previous logic. Doesn't address logic of any other case. Just states that he doesn't think the legionaire wagon will go anywhere and states that charm wagon "wouldn't be worse case."
5.
virus90 wrote:apparently its clear that hotshot is mafia? see little expalning lots of voting. will see if i can rearead later to see if i can come to the same conclusion
Nothing much here. Doesn't push to reopen the case on streaker or even form an opinion.
6.
virus90 wrote:what is this charade and how is it helping in any way?
Not much here either. still I did actually get a bit of a laugh out of the Storr-Mtam dialogue. Just wanted to say that.
Overall read on virus, posts and content seem lacking (that's his complete number of posts since confirming not including his joke vote at the beginning.) and often non-committal. Would like to know why he didn't care that much for the Charm case or opinions on other people beyond Legionaire.
It is early in the game so lack of content isn't completely damning but I do have to say that I am getting a scum vibe from his overall posts here.
So family issues are mostly dealt with, I should be a bit more active now.
