Discuss

Moderator: Community Team
mrswdk wrote:re OP: does it matter?
Phatscotty wrote:12-13-14 year old kids are being asked to choose their gender in public schools.
Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:re OP: does it matter?
Idk DK, does it matter? At least there must be a reason, eh?
Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:re OP: does it matter?
Idk DK, does it matter? At least there must be a reason, eh? Certainly this was never taught in a public school to all students before, so it's something brand new. Some might even call it radical. What do you think the reason is for the change in what is taught? ya know who would be perfect to ask that question? Some of the people who said this would never happen. They could tell us much better why they thought/said these kinds of things would have no place in public schools and that it was the parents place to handle such issues.
I already know most do not want to hear from those who said this is exactly what would happen...because they already said it and it was blown off and ignored as ridiculous. I suppose those who just a year ago said this would never happen will now take the blue pill and shrug 'so what?'
warmonger1981 wrote: Can I go and play women's volleyball or go into the showers with them?
Lootifer wrote:Genderbread person is a learning tool. Its efficacy may be terrible (ie it doesn't help kids learn) but that wasn't what Scott is asking I don't think.
99% of learning tools fit your definition of "stereotyping", we simplify stuff to make it easier to digest/learn all the time, we learn algebra before we take on partial differentials right? Same thing applies.
notyou2 wrote:PS what is your issue with this? I don't understand where you are coming from. Are you for this or against this, and why?
Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:PS what is your issue with this? I don't understand where you are coming from. Are you for this or against this, and why?
Traditional gender roles are necessary for society. The woman's job is to stay home, cook and clean, and tend the kids; the man's job is to go out and be the provider for the family. Many of today's societal ills can be traced back to our defiance of these gender roles.
notyou2 wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:PS what is your issue with this? I don't understand where you are coming from. Are you for this or against this, and why?
Traditional gender roles are necessary for society. The woman's job is to stay home, cook and clean, and tend the kids; the man's job is to go out and be the provider for the family. Many of today's societal ills can be traced back to our defiance of these gender roles.
Umm, specifically which societal ills can be attributed to this issue?
Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:PS what is your issue with this? I don't understand where you are coming from. Are you for this or against this, and why?
Traditional gender roles are necessary for society. The woman's job is to stay home, cook and clean, and tend the kids; the man's job is to go out and be the provider for the family. Many of today's societal ills can be traced back to our defiance of these gender roles.
Umm, specifically which societal ills can be attributed to this issue?
Decline in marriage, increase in divorce, homosexuality, trans-sexuality, school shootings, the national debt, global warming
thegreekdog wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:notyou2 wrote:PS what is your issue with this? I don't understand where you are coming from. Are you for this or against this, and why?
Traditional gender roles are necessary for society. The woman's job is to stay home, cook and clean, and tend the kids; the man's job is to go out and be the provider for the family. Many of today's societal ills can be traced back to our defiance of these gender roles.
Umm, specifically which societal ills can be attributed to this issue?
Decline in marriage, increase in divorce, homosexuality, trans-sexuality, school shootings, the national debt, global warming
Obamer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users