m=0
Moderator: Community Team

 new guy1
				new guy1
			





 
		jdean1 wrote:I am confirming the message.


 safariguy5
				safariguy5
			



















 
		
 NoSurvivors
				NoSurvivors
			





























 
		 HotShot53
				HotShot53
			


























 2
2 
		 . Jokes aside, it is rather odd that jdean has not made any post besides his confirmation one. Because dean has a vote on him, he will be in the runoff vote. I still want to read through again to make sure he is the favored candidate, but first a shower then class. Ill be gone from now till around 6 hours from now, but after class Im re-reading and Ill post my vote.
. Jokes aside, it is rather odd that jdean has not made any post besides his confirmation one. Because dean has a vote on him, he will be in the runoff vote. I still want to read through again to make sure he is the favored candidate, but first a shower then class. Ill be gone from now till around 6 hours from now, but after class Im re-reading and Ill post my vote.
 new guy1
				new guy1
			





 
		 HotShot53
				HotShot53
			


























 2
2 
		
 NoSurvivors
				NoSurvivors
			





























 
		
 new guy1
				new guy1
			





 
		
 Lootifer
				Lootifer
			







 
		

 Iron Butterfly
				Iron Butterfly
			














 
		Iron Butterfly wrote:With 16 players one can not be surprised if one or several players go inactive. I have never heard of this guy nor played with him before. I would go for a replacement.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

 Anarkistsdream
				Anarkistsdream
			













 
		
 crasp
				crasp
			
















 
		crasp wrote:just had a prod from Jonty. Sorry guys didnt realize how much time had passed. Still looking in but nothing to contribute so far.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

 Anarkistsdream
				Anarkistsdream
			













 
		Lootifer wrote:Heh. I've just come from a couple of games over at mafiascum. They're much more liberal with their votes over there (I was going to ask why the hell anark was fosing and ib/edoc not doing anything with their votes lol).
 But i want to lynch a rookie for completely unjustified reasons.
  But i want to lynch a rookie for completely unjustified reasons. Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

 edocsil
				edocsil
			



 
		edocsil wrote:Lootifer wrote:Heh. I've just come from a couple of games over at mafiascum. They're much more liberal with their votes over there (I was going to ask why the hell anark was fosing and ib/edoc not doing anything with their votes lol).
But i want to lynch a rookie for completely unjustified reasons.
In seriousness I didn't throw my vote due to the new lynch mechanism. I want to get a feel for how people will react to it day one, and I really don't intend on placing my vote until run-off so we can learn how people react to it.
Also Unvote


 Iron Butterfly
				Iron Butterfly
			














 
		nagerous wrote:I'd go for a prod or find a replacement.
 
 kgb007 wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:Lootifer wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Unvote vote benga
I am not gonna be on the chopping block if I can help it.
Do you have something to be worried about if you do end up there?
Unvote vote Anark
Oohhh.. yeah, that was a bad slip up on D-1 especially... when no one really knows what's going on yet...
Eh.. now my post looks scummy too
i actually don't find nosurv's double post to be suspicious after reading through the exchange a few times but i could see where people would want to jump on it
i'll shift the focus to game setup, 16 players, no VTs, how many mafia can we fairly expect? 3? 4? and a SK? or 3rd party?
purely speculation but perhaps this little exchange between nosurv/lootifer/IB/anark/edoc is a bit of misdirection by mafia, i mean i just listed 1/3 of the players so odds are one of them aren't town!!
 Nebuchadnezer
				Nebuchadnezer
			








 
		Iron Butterfly wrote:edocsil wrote:But i want to lynch a rookie for completely unjustified reasons.
In seriousness I didn't throw my vote due to the new lynch mechanism. I want to get a feel for how people will react to it day one, and I really don't intend on placing my vote until run-off so we can learn how people react to it.
Also Unvote
Just an add on to what Edocsil said. Keep in mind this is not mafiascum. Its a different culture. Here at CC there is a formed core base of players who overtime have gotten a feel for how each other play. That does not mean everyone is predictable. Its always good when new players arrive and stay.
One does not need to vote every time one puts pressure on. I asked a legitimate question with some follow up.


 Lootifer
				Lootifer
			







 
		

 Iron Butterfly
				Iron Butterfly
			














 
		
 Eldario
				Eldario
			






 
		
 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		
 benga
				benga
			


























 
		jonty125 wrote:Vote Count
Benga (3) - benga; virus90; Anarkistsdream;
jdean1 (2) - kgb007; safariguy5
Anarkistsdream (1) - crasp;
virus90 (1) - Iron Butterfly;
Nebuchadnezer (1) - Nebuchadnezer
NoSurvivors (1) - Lootifer
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Deadline is Monday, 24th February @ 1800 GMT. If the vote count were to remain as so at deadline a 24-hour runoff period would be enforced.
 Nebuchadnezer
				Nebuchadnezer
			








 
		Nebuchadnezer wrote:jonty125 wrote:Vote Count
Benga (3) - benga; virus90; Anarkistsdream;
jdean1 (2) - kgb007; safariguy5
Anarkistsdream (1) - crasp;
virus90 (1) - Iron Butterfly;
Nebuchadnezer (1) - Nebuchadnezer
NoSurvivors (1) - Lootifer
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Deadline is Monday, 24th February @ 1800 GMT. If the vote count were to remain as so at deadline a 24-hour runoff period would be enforced.
Unvote


 NoSurvivors
				NoSurvivors
			





























 
		

 jdean1
				jdean1
			






 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users