Conquer Club

THE BIBLE....ADULTS ONLY!!!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby strike wolf on Thu May 17, 2007 6:57 pm

Danmagnet wrote:
strike wolf wrote:
Danmagnet wrote:Well regardless of whether the book can be considered indecent or not I would support the notion that the Bible should be banned for under 18s, as should any religious book. I do wonder how many people take up religion because of their own free will and what percentage is just because they were brought up with it and not to question it.

I think baptisms or any form of religious indoctrination should also be banned for under 18s. If you're not old enough to cast a meaningless vote for a government that will ignore you anyway you're certainly not old enough to decide what to believe with regards to your existence, worldly conduct and the afterlife.


you really do not know what you are talking about. Banning the bible and other religious texts for those under 18 will not stop their parents and other members of society from influencing them with religion. I know people who are christians, who go to church every sunday and pray basically every night and still have not read the bible all the way through. Banning the book would do nothing.


You don't know what you're talking about. I said all sorts of religious events, thus including baptisms or indeed church attendance for under 18s. Please read what I say before criticising it.


So banning baptisms and going to church are going to stop the parents from influencing their kids? You don't need to go to church or read the bible to be influenced by christianity if your parents are christian and the same goes for every other religion. Half of the people who are christian at my school don't go to church on a regular basis. Also, most baptisms happen when the child is very young, usually too young to even remember it or even know why it happened.

I also doubt that barring people under 18 from churches would be a very popular suggestion anyways.
User avatar
Cadet strike wolf
 
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Postby 2dimes on Fri May 18, 2007 1:59 am

Jay, you've seen very few churches even mention hell yet somehow read the word into my post.

I truely hope there is no hell but it makes no difference to me if there is or not.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13085
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: THE BIBLE....ADULTS ONLY!!!

Postby Iliad on Fri May 18, 2007 2:11 am

Jafnhár wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Oh I see. So ten minutes ago it was order of the day to ban mentioning homosexuality. But now it's the Bible getting banned, that sort of thing isn't so cool?

C'mon Jay. Sort it out mate. This is hypocrisy of the highest order.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 9:48 am

2dimes wrote:Jay, you've seen very few churches even mention hell yet somehow read the word into my post.

I truely hope there is no hell but it makes no difference to me if there is or not.



Not following. "read the word into my post"? I do read the Bible for myself. I have heard a sermon by John Haigi (sp) about hell. I have read a few books on the subject as well. But most churches I've been in over my lifetime seem to exclude this topic from Jesus' teachings. (Maybe I just attended them on the wrong day) :P
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: THE BIBLE....ADULTS ONLY!!!

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 9:50 am

Iliad wrote:
Jafnhár wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Oh I see. So ten minutes ago it was order of the day to ban mentioning homosexuality. But now it's the Bible getting banned, that sort of thing isn't so cool?

C'mon Jay. Sort it out mate. This is hypocrisy of the highest order.




I never called for the banning of anything. Showing it to kids in school yes. But the movie itself no. :roll:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby codyjd on Fri May 18, 2007 9:57 am

heavycola wrote:So it's kind of like scientology - don't tell them about the really far-out stuff until you have them well and truly snared, and have relieved them of as much cash as possible...

I guess it's a lose-lose situation. If they talk about hell people say "scare tactics", if they don't it's "money-snitching"
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant codyjd
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Australia

Postby heavycola on Fri May 18, 2007 10:06 am

jay_a2j wrote:
2dimes wrote:Jay, you've seen very few churches even mention hell yet somehow read the word into my post.

I truely hope there is no hell but it makes no difference to me if there is or not.



Not following. "read the word into my post"? I do read the Bible for myself. I have heard a sermon by John Haigi (sp) about hell. I have read a few books on the subject as well. But most churches I've been in over my lifetime seem to exclude this topic from Jesus' teachings. (Maybe I just attended them on the wrong day) :P


Jay i think you're supposed to attend on Sunday :P

The church may exclude hell from sermons but that doesn't mean they don't believe in it wholeheartedly.

The bible isn't concrete about hell; readers believe what they want (as with sooooo much else in there). Seems to me reading some guy's fire and brimstone interpretation is just going to scare you pointlessly. Course, if you're Anne 'Look at me! Look at me!' Coulter, hell is a source of unending joy as it is where all liberals/lefties/disagreers are going to suffer unimaginable torment for all eternity.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 10:12 am

heavycola wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
2dimes wrote:Jay, you've seen very few churches even mention hell yet somehow read the word into my post.

I truely hope there is no hell but it makes no difference to me if there is or not.



Not following. "read the word into my post"? I do read the Bible for myself. I have heard a sermon by John Haigi (sp) about hell. I have read a few books on the subject as well. But most churches I've been in over my lifetime seem to exclude this topic from Jesus' teachings. (Maybe I just attended them on the wrong day) :P


Jay i think you're supposed to attend on Sunday :P

The church may exclude hell from sermons but that doesn't mean they don't believe in it wholeheartedly.

The bible isn't concrete about hell; readers believe what they want (as with sooooo much else in there). Seems to me reading some guy's fire and brimstone interpretation is just going to scare you pointlessly. Course, if you're Anne 'Look at me! Look at me!' Coulter, hell is a source of unending joy as it is where all liberals/lefties/disagreers are going to suffer unimaginable torment for all eternity.




Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Backglass on Fri May 18, 2007 10:32 am

jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Huh? Cute? Dang jay, she's a hag. She has a nice body it seems, but that face. Ugh.

There are plenty of "cute" conservatives but she isn't one of them.

Image
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 10:48 am

Backglass wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Huh? Cute? Dang jay, she's a hag. She has a nice body it seems, but that face. Ugh.

There are plenty of "cute" conservatives but she isn't one of them.

Image




Look, I'll stick with Coulter, you stick with Madeline Albright. Fair enough?
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby vtmarik on Fri May 18, 2007 10:50 am

Backglass wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Huh? Cute? Dang jay, she's a hag. She has a nice body it seems, but that face. Ugh.

There are plenty of "cute" conservatives but she isn't one of them.

Image


I'd hit it. As I understand it, her whole conservative insanity thing is one big satire.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby heavycola on Fri May 18, 2007 11:02 am

She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:06 am

jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Oh come on Jay, I would have thought even you wouldn't have sunk this low...

She's a racist and a bigot of the highest order.

She uses the words 'raghead', 'jihad monkey' and 'camel jockey' to refer to Muslims.

She called Edwards a 'faggot' and accused Obama of being a supporter of Al-Quaeda...

Instead of airlines, she said Muslims should use 'flying carpets'.

She said North Korea should be 'nuked for fun'.

Cute, eh?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 11:09 am

Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Oh come on Jay, I would have thought even you wouldn't have sunk this low...

She's a racist and a bigot of the highest order.

She uses the words 'raghead', 'jihad monkey' and 'camel jockey' to refer to Muslims.

She called Edwards a 'faggot' and accused Obama of being a supporter of Al-Quaeda...

Instead of airlines, she said Muslims should use 'flying carpets'.

She said North Korea should be 'nuked for fun'.

Cute, eh?



That's sensationalism. She doesn't mean it... but she sure has gotten popular because of it (kinda like Howard Stern).

And even if she does mean it...she's still cute. I was commenting on her looks not her politics. :wink:
Last edited by jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:09 am

heavycola wrote:She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.


Yeh he really did... Here's the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:10 am

jay_a2j wrote:That's sensationalism. She doesn't mean it... but she sure has gotten popular because of it (kinda like Howard Stern).

And even if she does mean it...she's still cute. I was commenting on her looks not her politics. :wink:


Meh... Unfortunately as well has her views her voice bypasses her mouth and comes out of her nose...
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby vtmarik on Fri May 18, 2007 11:11 am

Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Always liked Anne "cute conservative" Coulter. :P


Oh come on Jay, I would have thought even you wouldn't have sunk this low...

She's a racist and a bigot of the highest order.

She uses the words 'raghead', 'jihad monkey' and 'camel jockey' to refer to Muslims.

She called Edwards a 'faggot' and accused Obama of being a supporter of Al-Quaeda...

Instead of airlines, she said Muslims should use 'flying carpets'.

She said North Korea should be 'nuked for fun'.

Cute, eh?


I still think that it's all an act along the lines of the Andy Kaufman and Jerry Lawler feud.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:17 am

vtmarik wrote:I still think that it's all an act along the lines of the Andy Kaufman and Jerry Lawler feud.


Its a bloody insensitive act is she's calling 9/11 widows 'witches' and suchlike :D

It would be OK if no-one took her seriously, but she has bestsellers and cons all over the world (in the UK too) hanging on her every word!
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 11:18 am

Guiscard wrote:
heavycola wrote:She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.


Yeh he really did... Here's the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k




I thought she did well. Paxman obviously leans to the left. No surprise there!
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:21 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
heavycola wrote:She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.


Yeh he really did... Here's the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k




I thought she did well. Paxman obviously leans to the left. No surprise there!


Mainly because when asked to justify her beliefs in creationism she just went 'meeehhhhrhrhhh...'

I've heard much better arguments out of you or Luns. She seemed to have no knowledge of, well, of anything really! I could mount a better defence for ID!
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby vtmarik on Fri May 18, 2007 11:26 am

Guiscard wrote:
vtmarik wrote:I still think that it's all an act along the lines of the Andy Kaufman and Jerry Lawler feud.


Its a bloody insensitive act is she's calling 9/11 widows 'witches' and suchlike :D

It would be OK if no-one took her seriously, but she has bestsellers and cons all over the world (in the UK too) hanging on her every word!


Everyone took Kaufman's Intergender Wrestling thing seriously, it basically ruined his career.

If it does turn out to be a satire, the cons are going to be the butt of every joke for decades to come. Humor is very personal, and I think she's hilarious. If she is serious, it'll be less funny.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 18, 2007 11:28 am

Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
heavycola wrote:She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.


Yeh he really did... Here's the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k




I thought she did well. Paxman obviously leans to the left. No surprise there!


Mainly because when asked to justify her beliefs in creationism she just went 'meeehhhhrhrhhh...'

I've heard much better arguments out of you or Luns. She seemed to have no knowledge of, well, of anything really! I could mount a better defence for ID!




I think she was saying that there is no evidence for Darwinism and did not endorse an "alternative". Just that Darwinism is taught as science and she is saying its faith not science.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby heavycola on Fri May 18, 2007 11:32 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
heavycola wrote:She is an attention whore. And much as I would like to f*ck her over by projecting feelings of loving kindness and compassion towards her, I end up laughing at her instead. Paxman tore her a new arsehole, bless him. I mean I know we have our barneys on here about evolution vs creationism, but listening to her try and stick up for ID was like listening to a plumber discuss string theory.
No offence to plumbers, they are much more use than Ann 'can i get on tv again now please?' coulter ever will be, except as an object of laughter and derision. I cannot believe anyoen serious about progressive politics gives her any time at all, no matter what side of the spectrum they come from.


Yeh he really did... Here's the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k




I thought she did well. Paxman obviously leans to the left. No surprise there!


Well... no, actually.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Guiscard on Fri May 18, 2007 11:36 am

heavycola wrote:Well... no, actually.


Yeh. Paxo is known for giving pretty much everyone a hard time. He's a hardline interviewer and journalist, and he doesn't stand for any shit, but it would be hard to pin a political agenda on him.

He's an equal opportunity hater! :D
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby Backglass on Fri May 18, 2007 12:00 pm

Image

:lol:
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun