Chariot of Fire wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:If 1 v 1 is an issue and there is enough games w/o 1 v 1 then why even include any of them in the data?
There is no guarantee that all of the fixtures meet the 'minimum of 12 games' criteria for inclusion in the F400. This is because there are only 9 games initially that do, to which are added 6 more games which are chosen from 1v1, doubs, trips & quads. So whilst some of the match-ups may meet the minimum of 12 team games, there is no certainty they all will. So for inclusion in the F400 someone would have to check which of the head-to-heads (15 games) had a minimum of 12 doubs/trips/quads.
That's how I see it anyway.
This may be a moot point. I don't see anyway that the LX tourney gets counted at this point. There's too many irregularities for it to be counted IMO. We weren't informed that we would not have privileges to direct invite when when we agreed to the 96 hour time frame. Furthermore, Lindax refused to even send invites on our behalf. This is especially peculiar when one considers that he is strictly enforcing his forfeiture policy.
And last round, when Lindax was informed of this issue, he made no effort to request privileges (even though the omission is on his end). Nor, did he bother to give notice to the clans, who were competing in the next round, that they would need to be prepared to use his less efficient (non-standard) system.
Also, IMO. It should be concluded in advance of such a competition if the results (and what amount of results) should be included in the F400. I don't believe that Lindax took full care to compensate for that reality. Though, he may have had a justifiable blind spot as it is not his responsibility to directly regard the rankings. Though, it would have certainly been advisable.